‘US sanctions killing Iranian civilians’
As no progress has been achieved between Tehran and the IAEA over Iran’s nuclear program, ordinary Iranians continue to suffer from “genocidal” sanctions imposed by the US, says political commentator Hamid Reza Emadi.
RT,
24
August, 2012
Iran
and the UN nuclear watchdog are set to resume talks later on Friday –
more than two months after the previous round failed.
Tehran
insists it only wants peaceful energy, but the West remains
suspicious of its nuclear ambitions.
The
harsh Western sanctions imposed on Iran have no affect on the
government, claims Tehran-based Emadi. Instead they are only hurting
the ordinary Iranians.
Emadi
explained to RT how his own family is affected. His father, who
suffers from diabetes, cannot receive medication due to Western
sanctions.
“Thousands
and thousands of Iranians across the country have these problems.
Cancer patients are not getting the medication they need,” he said.
The
sanctions that the United States has imposed on Iran are “genocidal,”
Emadi claims. “They are killing people, killing ordinary civilians,
people who have nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program.”
“The
United Nation has shamelessly remained silent, the UN is practically
doing nothing – it lost its credibility,” he concludes.
James
Corbett, editor of the Corbett Report, believes that the UN nuclear
watchdog has been exposed during this dispute “as little more than
a gang of thugs rather than a bureaucratic agency that’s trying to
neutrally arbitrate this dispute.”
Corbett
insists that IAEA’s actions demonstrate that currently existing
nuclear powers are really trying to enforce a monopoly on nuclear
power and dictate what countries can or cannot have access to it.
“They
are attempting to hold the Iranian government which is a signatory to
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to higher standards than other
members of the IAEA who are currently using nuclear power.”
Corbett
says Tehran is cooperative with the UN nuclear watchdog but there are
many underhanded tactics being used to undermine its credibility.
“I
don’t think it’s unreasonable fro the Iranian government simply
to ask for details what it is that the IAEA is going to be looking
for when they give them access to these sites,” he says.
“So
it’s being spun as some kind of rejection on Iran’s part, but
it’s actually not.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.