What
Happened To The Debt?
Raul
Illargi Meijer
22
August, 2012
Alright,
OK, so we have new sorts of relative highs in European and US stock
markets, even as we keep a w(e)ary eye on Shanghai's new lows. The
western highs seem to have a lot to do with all kinds of expectations
of ECB sovereign bond purchases and/or cooling German resistance
against them.
All
this is accompanied by a rising Euro, and that little detail is far
more puzzling than is generally acknowledged. Because there is only
one reason for the ECB, with perhaps Angela Merkel and the Bundesbank
chiming in, to even consider such measures as more - PIIGS - bond
buying, that are tremendously unpopular among a broad swath of
Europeans. That reason is that the PIIGS countries, and Greece, Spain
and Italy in particular, are doing much worse than anyone wishes to
admit in public.
Thus,
we have a substantial part of the Eurozone sinking deeper fast than
anyone will tell you, while at the same time the currency they use is
rising. A rise based on expectations of other Eurozone nations,
notably Germany, basically putting up the health of their own
economies as collateral to inspire confidence in ECB sovereign bond
purchases. Now, you can play this game for a while, no reason to
doubt that. But I would personally think we've finished playing out
that particular "while" a long time ago and running.
Whatever remains now is but a wager. As in: the entire Eurozone has
turned into a casino.
If
we, and they, the ECB, Germany, Holland, Finland on the one hand, and
Monti, Rajoy and Samaras on the other, want to play these moves AND
have a shred of credibility left once they're done (and I know what
you're saying: will they ever be done?), we and they will need in the
end to be able to answer this one simple question. Which they will
never ask, we will have to do that for them. That question is:
Where's The Debt? Or maybe more accurately: What Happened To The
Debt?.
If
a party, be they an individual, a company or a sovereign nation,
carries so much debt that it is vulnerable to attacks by the likes of
bond markets (or bailiffs in the case of individuals), a handout or
bailout will never suffice to abolish the threat for very long,
unless it is provided on the condition that the debt that led to the
threat in the first place is restructured. That is to say, creditors
take a haircut on what is owed to them.
Handing
over money to these creditors without that haircut doesn't even begin
to solve the issue. It just - hopefully - keeps them quiet for a
little while, but then they'll be back, because they're still owed
money. Yeah, think Tony Soprano.
In
the case of Europe, the EU's national governments, Germany's first of
all, refuse to tackle the debt issue, when it comes to Italy and
Spain, because it would threaten their own respective banks. And
probably their pension funds too. The highly needed haircuts that
would come with the highly needed debt restructuring, would threaten
to expose the very real very dire situation that these banks are in.
And that in turn would risk setting off a domino avalanche that would
risk bringing down international - including American - banks as
well.
And
so the one question that makes any true sense to ask, is never asked.
In
the case of Spain, it has become abundantly clear lately that there
is no clear distinction to be made between bank debt and sovereign
debt. Hence, an ECB bond buying program would be beneficial to
Spanish banks too. If only because they own so much of the stuff,
something they were coaxed into doing by the ECB schemes that
allowed, nay pressed, them to borrow on the cheap to buy their own
sovereign debt. Rajoy even suggested using the remainder of the €100
billion bank bailout for sovereign debt. Which is quite plainly
illegal, but who's counting?
If
you would add Spanish sovereign debt to Spanish bank debt, you would
come up with a number that nobody in the whole wide world wishes to
address (and so they don't).
Which
is why we see Mario Draghi et al "invent" clever schemes to
buy Spanish bonds even though that's not the ECB's mandate at all.
The
latest line is that they do it to "stabilize the currency".
Which is fine in itself, or so I guess, only we would like to know
how long they would plan to stabilize it for (two weeks doesn't seem
to cut it). And that issue is not addressed. Ever.
Hence,
we are left to conclude that there is no effort to deal with the
debt, there's not even an attempt to do it. Mario Draghi is merely
trying to lift a corner of the magic flying finance carpet, so Spain
can be allowed to sweep its true debt burden under it, out of our
sight.
And
a carpet can hide quite a bit of dead dust for quite some time, as
you know if you've ever tried the approach. The thing about debt,
though, is that it's not dead dust.
Debt
lives. It's alive. It's almost organic. Debt festers and ferments
under that carpet, it requires interest and principal payments, and
it grows if these payments are not made.
Well,
if you look at the real numbers, Spain can't even meet the interest
payments anymore. And whether that's 6% or 7%+ is immaterial really.
That's why it's in such a mess that Draghi feels he needs to come up
with these rule and law bending and stretching schemes to begin with.
If Spain had any chance at all of getting out from under its debt
load on its own anytime soon, we wouldn't be talking about these ECB
measures today at all.
But
we are talking about them. And they lift financial markets. And as
the Eurozone deteriorates, the euro - ironically - goes up.
Why?
¿Por quĂ©? Because the markets think Germany et al will agree to
join Mario Draghi's mind games and pay up to lower Spain's debt. As
simple as that.
But
Draghi has no solution for the Spanish debt, be it sovereign or bank
debt. He just has that carpet to sweep the debt under.
Well,
he perhaps has other options, like debt restructurings, defaults
etc., but he's not addressing those. Mario is a servant of the
banking industry. Just like any other central banker and government
official in the western world.
There's
no-one in sight who tries to balance the reality of the sovereign and
financial sector debt with the ability of the people, the taxpayers,
to pay for it. Which is why the Euro can be a hot item even as the
countries that presently use it as their currency go down in flames.
And their people go down with it.
Yes,
there's money to be made in the markets. That's obvious when you look
the numbers. But what would have to be at least as obvious is that
none of it is based on anything fundamental.
This
rally will implode upon itself.
Some
of the big boys will have left in time, and made a killing. From the
point of view of the people on the ground and in the street, however,
it's not going to look all that great. They're mere pawns in a game
that seeks to maximize profits off their backs.
And
that will continue whatever Mario Draghi or Angela Merkel present in
the way of grand plans. They may all look great, and the markets may
react with yet another high of one kind or the other, but down the
line there's still that one and only question that needs to be
answered:
What
Happened To The Debt?
Any
plan that doesn't address that question directly is worth less than
the digital paper it's written on. Any such plan won't solve a thing.
And
that magic carpet that the likes of Mario Draghi are trying to sweep
reality under? You know what? It's gruesomely expensive, but that's
not all, the cost is not even the most important part. Here's what
is: that carpet was bought on credit. And the collateral for that
credit is the future of Europe's younger, even its unborn,
generations. That's right, the generations that presently face 50% or
so unemployment numbers.
Enjoy
your rally. But do realize that you're trying to outsmart reality.
It's hiding under a carpet, but it's no less real.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.