I
don't believe Israelis want war any more than Iranians do – it's
their sociopath leaders!
In 2003 people demonstrated against the invasion of Iraq; this time round it's not even part of the conversation, at least in this country.
Israel
Plans Iran Strike; Citizens Say Government Serious
Dozens
of Israelis crowded in front of a storefront at a Jerusalem shopping
mall yesterday to pick up new gas masks, part of civil defense
preparations in case the military strikes Iran and the Islamic
Republic or its allies retaliate.
16
August, 2012
“Our
leaders seem to have gotten very hawkish in their speeches and this
time it seems they mean what they say,” said Yoram Lands, 68, a
professor of business administration, who was picking up new masks
for himself and his wife at a distribution center in the mall.
Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told visiting U.S. Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta on Aug. 1 that time “is running out” for a peaceful
solution to Iran’s atomic program. The Tel Aviv-based Haaretz
newspaper reported Aug. 10 that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud
Barak are considering bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities before U.S.
elections on Nov. 6. Mark Regev, Netanyahu’s spokesman, said
government policy is not to comment on media speculation.
“It
seems that Netanyahu and Barak are making a special effort now to
prepare the Israeli public for an attack on Iran,” said Shlomo
Brom, a former commander of the army’s Strategic Planning Division,
who said any strike could come within the next six months. In the
past, rhetoric was directed at pushing the international community to
take stronger action against Iran, said Brom, a senior research
fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv
University.
New
System
While
Israeli leaders repeatedly have said they could strike Iran’s
facilities, the words are now being accompanied by civil-defense
measures, including a new system that uses text messages to alert the
public to missile attacks, wider distribution of gas masks and the
appointment of a new Home Front Defense minister. Schools in the
north will hold bomb- shelter drills to prepare for possible rocket
attacks when they open later this month, the Yedioth Ahronoth
newspaper reported today, without saying where it got the
information.
The
threats also come as nuclear talks between Iran and world powers have
stalled and increased sanctions have failed to stop Iran’s atomic
progress.
In
weighing a potential strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Israel is
aware that it may only delay, not stop, the Persian nation’s
nuclear program, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren said
today.
“One,
two, three, four years are a long time in the Middle East -- look
what’s happened in the last year” in terms of political change,
Oren said today at a Bloomberg Government breakfast in Washington.
Israel’s
Economy
Concern
that the Israeli moves may herald a possible strike helped weaken the
shekel to its lowest value in almost 15 months this week and pushed
the Tel Aviv Stock Market (TA-25) to a three-week low on Aug. 13. The
Bloomberg Israel-US Equity Index of the most-traded Israeli companies
in New York sank the most in three months, making the benchmark gauge
the cheapest in two years relative to the Standard & Poor’s
500.
The
cost of insuring Israel’s debt rose today, with five- year
credit-default swaps increasing to 155, the highest level in more
than two weeks, according to data provider CMA, which is owned by
McGraw-Hill Cos. and compiles prices quoted by dealers in the
privately negotiated market.
“With
the headlines and saber-rattling we’ve had the last week, there is
a higher risk premium, so it’s logical you see the currency
weaken,” said Jonathan Katz, a Jerusalem-based economist for HSBC
Holdings Plc.
U.S.
Cooperation
U.S.
officials, concerned that a conflict could destabilize the region and
send oil prices soaring, have been urging caution. Panetta told
reporters yesterday the “window is still open” to resolve the
dispute through diplomacy and that he thinks Israel hasn’t made a
decision “at this time” to attack Iranian nuclear sites.
David
Rothkopf, a visiting scholar at the Washington-based Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace, said it is “extremely unlikely
Israel could do anything without a regional ally or the cooperation
of the U.S.”
Iranian
officials have dismissed the threats of an attack.
“We
don’t think any of the officials in this illegitimate regime wants
to do something as illogical as this,” Ramin Mehmanparast, Iran’s
Foreign Ministry spokesman, told reporters at a Tehran press
conference yesterday. Iran says its nuclear program aims to produce
electricity for a growing population.
Amid
earlier Israeli threats, the U.S. and its European allies passed
tougher sanctions against the Islamic Republic that have been taking
a toll on the country’s economy.
Oil
Production
Iranian
oil production has declined 20 percent this year to 2.86 million
barrels a day, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Crude oil
futures in New York have advanced 19 percent in the seven days ending
Aug. 7 as Iranian exports have fallen, according to an Aug. 10 report
of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Commitments of
Traders.
Prices
of meat, rice and bread have spiraled in Iran as inflation
accelerated to 22.4 percent in the 12 months through June 20.
There
are concerns that repeated Israeli threats to strike Iran may force
Israel’s hand if the West doesn’t take more serious action.
The
Israelis are “almost in the comic situation of threatening to
strike repeatedly -- this is the third threat in three months -- but
nothing ever happens, which in my view is damaging to their
credibility,” said Aaron David Miller, a former State Department
official who is a distinguished fellow at the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars, a Washington policy group.
‘Radio
Silence’
Barak
in February said that Israel would need to act militarily within
months, before Iran reaches a “zone of immunity” where its
underground enrichment facilities would be invulnerable to Israeli
air strikes.
Isaac
Herzog, a parliament member from the opposition Labor party,
criticized the government for creating the impression of an imminent
attack.
“If
Netanyahu and Barak are serious about the subject, they should
maintain ‘radio silence’ about it, and Netanyahu should meet with
Obama in the White House to discuss it,” Herzog told Israel Radio.
Polls
show the Israeli public’s opposition to a strike has been easing.
Some 46 percent of Israelis are against an attack on Iran without
U.S. support, according to a poll by the Dialog Institute reported on
Channel 10 on Aug. 12. That compares with 58 percent opposed to such
a move in a survey by Dialog published on March 8 in Haaretz. Both
surveys questioned 500 Israeli adults.
‘Closing
Window’
Matan
Vilnai, the outgoing home front defense minister, said the ministry
has prepared for a scenario in which hundreds of rockets fired by
Iran and its allies fall on Israel, the Maariv newspaper reported.
“The
evaluations are that the war would last 30 days on several fronts,”
Vilnai said, according to Maariv. The number of Israeli fatalities
are estimated at about 500, “maybe more, maybe less,” he said,
according to Maariv.
U.S.
presidential elections may influence an Israeli decision.
Israelis
“believe there’s a closing window of opportunity, and they also
believe politically it’s far more complex if they wait until after
November to strike,” said David Makovsky, director of research at
the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “I think they’re
concerned that if they attack during a lame-duck period they have a
lot more uncertainty about American reaction.”
Syria
Conflict
An
attack would also come as one of Iran’s closest allies, Syria, is
busy battling domestic insurgents who control parts of the country’s
cities and countryside. That also has weakened Lebanon’s Hezbollah
movement, an Iranian ally that depends on Syria for arms and support.
“This
is the best window Israel is going to get,” said Gerald Steinberg,
professor of political science at Bar Ilan University outside Tel
Aviv. “If a strike doesn’t happen in the next six months and Iran
doesn’t back down, then the Israeli threat will lose its
credibility.”
Israel
to strike Iran as window of opportunity narrows?
Tensions
between Iran and Israel continue to escalate amid reports over the
past week that Tel Aviv has drawn up plans for a strike against
Iran’s nuclear facilities before the US presidential election in
November.
15
August, 2012
Israeli
Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the country’s new ambassador to
China, Matan Vilnai, recently discussed precise estimates of Israeli
casualties, and the timeframe of a possible war with Iran. A
hypothetical war with Iran would probably last a month, and include
about 500 estimated Israeli casualties from Iranian missile strikes,
Vilnai told Israeli newspaper Maariv on Wednesday.
Though
Israel has repeatedly threatened preemptive strikes against Iran over
the country’s controversial nuclear program, this latest round of
saber-rattling is taking place under slightly different
circumstances.
A
new, last-minute National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) update provided
to the Obama administration mirrored Israeli intelligence that Iran
had made bigger nuclear advances than previously thought, Israeli
newspaper Haaretz reported on Sunday. Iran’s alleged progress
towards nuclear weaponry was “far beyond the scope known” to UN
inspectors, the report said.
Haaretz
did not name any sources or confirm any information in its report,
quoting a senior Israeli official who declined to be identified.
Tel
Aviv seems to be taking action in support of its hawkish stance,
testing emergency text-messaging services in some cities, and
increasing the sale and distribution of gas-masks. Recent polls also
suggest that, while domestic Israeli opinion is still opposed to war
against Iran without international support, that stance is gradually
softening as the government seems to be preparing its citizens for
war.
Their
last chance to strike
Another
consideration is the November US presidential election: Israeli
officials would rather strike sooner, with Barack Obama in office,
than risk the unknowns of a Mitt Romney administration.
"If
Mitt Romney is elected, history shows that presidents do not
undertake dramatic operations in their first year in office unless
forced to," the unidentified Israeli official told Haaretz.
The
current instability in Syria, Iran’s biggest regional ally, lends
credence to the theory that Israel’s best opportunity to strike may
be imminent.
Leon
Panetta and the Obama administration have signaled no change in their
preference that the situation to be resolved through diplomacy,
leading to the conclusion that if Israel finally decides to strike,
it will do so alone.
“I've
said this before, I'll say it now: I don't believe they made a
decision as to whether or not they will – they will go in and
attack Iran at this time," Panetta told reporters at a press
conference on Tuesday. "Obviously, they're an independent,
they're a sovereign country. They'll ultimately make decisions based
on what they think is in their national security interest…The
reality is that we still think there is room to continue to
negotiate."
But
without US backing, Israel’s repeated threats to attack Iran’s
nuclear sites are being met with increasing skepticism.
Aaron
David Miller, a former State Department official, echoed that
sentiment, telling Bloomberg Businessweek that the Israelis are
“almost in the comic situation of threatening to strike repeatedly
– this is the third threat in three months – but nothing ever
happens, which in my view is damaging to their credibility.”
Tehran
dismissed the latest round of Israeli threats as “stupid.”
“Even
if some officials in the illegitimate regime [Israel] want to carry
out such a stupid action, there are those inside [the Israeli
government] who won't allow it because they know they would suffer
very severe consequences from such an act," Iranian ministry
spokesperson Ramin Mehmanparast told reporters on Tuesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.