This
is not news to most of us, but it does come from James Hansen.
It
has seemed to me that all the talk has been about sea rise,period,
and there has been little acknowledgement of the link between global
warming and climate chaos.
Study:
Current heatwave likely to show global warming is ‘scientific fact’
A
new study by the man called the “godfather of global warming”
says there’s no getting around it: the heat wave pounding most of
the country – and the world – is the result of man-made global
warming.
5
August, 2012
“This
is not some scientific theory,” NASA scientist James Hansen told
the Associated Press. “We are now experiencing scientific fact.”
Hansen’s
latest study, which he collaborated on with Retoo Ruedy and Makiko
Sato released this past January, focused on record temperature rises
in Texas, Oklahoma, Europe and the Middle East between 2003 and 2011,
the latter two caused thousands of deaths. The study was published
Saturday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
In
each case, Hansen and his team concluded that the drastic increase in
record highs in recent years – temperatures now likely to occur at
least once every 10 days, as opposed to once every 300 days in the
time from the 1950s to the 1980s – can be traced to global warming.
In a column for The Washington Post Friday, Hansen intimated it might
not stop there.
“Once
the data are gathered in a few weeks’ time, it’s likely that the
same will be true for the extremely hot summer the United States is
suffering through right now,” Hansen wrote. “These weather events
are not simply an example of what climate change could bring. They
are caused by climate change. The odds that natural variability
created these extremes are minuscule, vanishingly small. To count on
those odds would be like quitting your job and playing the lottery
every morning to pay the bills.”
And
why not add the extreme melting of the ice in Greenland this summer
and extreme weather throughout the globe?
Climate
change is here — and worse than we thought
James
Hansen - NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
4
August, 2012
When
I testified before the Senate in the hot
summer of 1988 , I warned of the kind of future that climate
change would bring to us and our planet. I painted a grim picture of
the consequences of steadily increasing temperatures, driven by
mankind’s use of fossil fuels.
But
I have a confession to make: I was too optimistic.
My
projections about increasing global temperature have been proved
true. But I failed to fully explore how quickly that average rise
would drive an increase in extreme weather.
In
a new analysis of the past six decades of global temperatures, which
will be published Monday, my colleagues and I have revealed a
stunning increase in the frequency of extremely hot summers, with
deeply troubling ramifications for not only our future but also for
our present.
This
is not a climate model or a prediction but actual observations of
weather events and temperatures that have happened. Our analysis
shows that it is no longer enough to say that global warming will
increase the likelihood of extreme weather and to repeat the caveat
that no individual weather event can be directly linked to climate
change. To the contrary, our analysis shows that, for the extreme hot
weather of the recent past, there is virtually no explanation other
than climate change.
The
deadly
European heat wave of 2003, the fiery Russian
heat wave of 2010 and catastrophic droughts
in Texas and Oklahoma last year can each be attributed to climate
change. And once the data are gathered in a few weeks’ time, it’s
likely that the same will be true for the extremely
hot summer the United States is suffering through right now.
These
weather events are not simply an example of what climate change could
bring. They are caused by climate change. The odds that natural
variability created these extremes are minuscule, vanishingly small.
To count on those odds would be like quitting your job and playing
the lottery every morning to pay the bills.
Twenty-four
years ago, I introduced the concept of “climate dice” to help
distinguish the long-term trend of climate change from the natural
variability of day-to-day weather. Some summers are hot, some cool.
Some winters brutal, some mild. That’s natural variability.
But
as the climate warms, natural variability is altered, too. In a
normal climate without global warming, two sides of the die would
represent cooler-than-normal weather, two sides would be normal
weather, and two sides would be warmer-than-normal weather. Rolling
the die again and again, or season after season, you would get an
equal variation of weather over time.
But
loading the die with a warming climate changes the odds. You end up
with only one side cooler than normal, one side average, and four
sides warmer than normal. Even with climate change, you will
occasionally see cooler-than-normal summers or a typically cold
winter. Don’t let that fool you.
Our
new peer-reviewed study, published by the National Academy of
Sciences, makes clear that while average global temperature has been
steadily rising due to a warming climate (up about 1.5 degrees
Fahrenheit in the past century), the extremes are actually becoming
much more frequent and more intense worldwide.
When
we plotted the world’s changing temperatures on a bell curve, the
extremes of unusually cool and, even more, the extremes of unusually
hot are being altered so they are becoming both more common and more
severe.
The
change is so dramatic that one face of the die must now represent
extreme weather to illustrate the greater frequency of extremely hot
weather events.
Such
events used to be exceedingly rare. Extremely hot temperatures
covered about 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent of the globe in the base
period of our study, from 1951 to 1980. In the last three decades,
while the average temperature has slowly risen, the extremes have
soared and now cover about 10 percent of the globe.
This
is the world we have changed, and now we have to live in it — the
world that caused the 2003 heat wave in Europe that killed more than
50,000 people and the 2011 drought in Texas that caused
more than $5 billion in damage. Such events, our data show, will
become even more frequent and more severe.
There
is still time to act and avoid a worsening climate, but we are
wasting precious time. We can solve the challenge of climate change
with a gradually rising fee on carbon collected from fossil-fuel
companies, with 100 percent of the money rebated to all legal
residents on a per capita basis. This would stimulate innovations and
create a robust clean-energy economy with millions of new jobs. It is
a simple, honest and effective solution.
The
future is now. And it is hot.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.