Crises
threaten to rot American Empire from inside
With
signs of a world economic slump mounting, external pressures from the
Euro crisis and the inherent internal contradictions of the U.S.
economic model threaten to rot the American Empire from the inside
out.
21
August, 2012
Although
the latest U.S. jobs report found 163,000 new jobs created in the
month of July, the nation’s unemployment rate still ticked up from
8.2 to 8.3 percent. And when factoring in both long-term and
short-term discouraged workers (those who have given up on searching
for work), the U.S. unemployment rate rises to over 20 percent.
Meanwhile, little optimism can be found for a recovered labor market
in the near term.
According
to the International Monetary Fund, the U.S. economy is to remain
growing at a meager rate of 2 percent into 2013, and is faced with a
host of “negative risks” in the short term--all of which threaten
to stymie growth even further. And according to a recent report from
the U.S. Federal Reserve, economic activity has indeed decelerated
over the first half of this year.
The
effects of the ever-deteriorating economic situation are of course
not limited to economic indicators alone, but are becoming more
visibly tangible as well. The recent spree of purportedly “senseless”
and “random” mass shootings across the U.S. are but one
manifestation of this growing societal breakdown. Such abhorrent
symptoms of a deeply imperiled society, though, ought to be expected.
As
British researchers Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett tirelessly
document in their 2009 book, The Spirit Level, “Inequality seems to
make countries dysfunctional across a wide range of outcomes”-from
physical and mental health, to levels of violence and societal trust.
And the U.S., as Wilkinson and Pickett note, is the most inequitable
society amongst the developed world.
Still,
as one might expect, with both U.S. political parties pandering to
the interests of the nation’s power elite, the political class has
been utterly incapable of articulating, much less actually
delivering, a way out of the current crisis. Instead, both parties
continue to adhere to the dogmatic neoliberal proscribed remedy of
disciplined austerity (or “shared sacrifice,” to use the
Washington lexicon). In other words, they continue to advocate a
further belt tightening by the already squeezed working class.
But
as the multifaceted U.S. internal decay continues to accelerate, a
further degree of exploitation of the already heavily exploited
working class offers little in the way of hope for a regeneration of
U.S. capitalism. Understanding such limits, the U.S. political elite
have thus set upon playing the old imperial game of intensifying
external aggression as a means of resolving internal contractions.
And nowhere is this more apparent than in the targeting of Iran.
U.S.
External Aggression and Iran
Set
against this backdrop of continued economic malaise, rampant
speculation has begun to proliferate once more through the U.S. media
as to if, and all the more likely, precisely when, Israel shall come
to strike Iran. This recent bout of bomb Iran fever has been stoked
by renewed Israeli threats of aggression.
Last
week, Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Danny Ayalon, came forth to
declare that “diplomacy has failed” and that the U.S. ought to
give Iran an ultimatum of a matter of “weeks, and not more than
that,” to halt its nuclear enrichment.
Ayalon’s
comments came amidst a rash of Israeli media reports indicating that
Israel was closing in on an attack--perhaps as soon as late
September, according to the Ma’ariv newspaper.
The
latest Israeli outburst was quickly scolded by the U.S. paper of
record for being irresponsible in tone. As the New York Times
editorialized, “There is still time for diplomacy. It would be best
served if the major powers stay united and Israeli leaders temper
loose talk of war.” But although the tone of the Obama
administration and U.S. media has been somewhat more tempered, the
U.S. stance is no less hawkish in substance.
In
fact, the focus on Israeli posturing obscures the fact that Israeli
bluster merely mirrors the official U.S. position. As President Obama
declared in March, in a pandering speech to the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee: “I have said that when it comes to
preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no
options off the table, and I mean what I say…Iran’s leaders
should understand that I do not have a policy of containment; I have
a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
The
fact that Israel’s nuclear arsenal-estimated to contain over 200
nuclear warheads-garners no mention in U.S. discussions of the
supposed “Iranian threat” is telling enough.
Instead,
the dangerous external aggression directed towards the people of Iran
by the U.S. and its lightly tethered attack dog, Israel, ought to be
viewed within the context of the economic crisis afflicting the U.S.
and the global capitalist system more broadly. For it is indeed the
menace of such intractable internal contradictions which have placed
the U.S., whether in conjunction with Israel or not, on an
accelerated warpath with Iran.
Given
this present state of affairs, the only hope in averting war lies is
a mass anti-war mobilization led by the workers of the world,
including those toiling within the belly of the imperial beast.
Absent such a movement, the future only portends untold misery for
working people in the U.S. and the world over.
Ben
Schreiner is a freelance writer covering US and international
politics. His work has appeared in al-Akhbar English, Asia Times
Online, CounterPunch, Dissident Voice, Global Research, Z Magazine,
and others.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.