“By
all means shread the constitution and spy on whom you like – but
don't spy on OUR elite!”
Congress
Is Going To War With The CIA
11
March, 2014
It
started with a remarkable statement Senate Intelligence Committee
Chair Dianne
Feinstein's made from the Senate floor Tuesday morning,
and it continued amid a barrage of angry statements from senators
later in the afternoon.
Congress
is going to war with the Central Intelligence Agency, spurred by
Feinstein's allegation the agency may have broken the law and
violated the U.S. Constitution by searching a stand-alone
congressional computer network.
Feinstein's
scathing comments, which Vermont Democratic Sen. Pat Leahy said were
among the most important in Senate floor history, opened up a public
chapter in a long simmering dispute.
"The
CIA did not ask the committee or its staff if the committee had
access to the internal review or how we obtained it," Feinstein
said in her blistering remarks. "Instead, the CIA just went and
searched the committee's computer."
The
CIA provided Congress with the computer network to allow the Senate
Intelligence Committee to review classified documents at CIA
headquarters as part of an investigation into the CIA's Bush-era
detention and interrogation programs. The incident in question
occurred in December, when Intelligence Committee investigators got
ahold of an internal agency review casting a particularly bad light
on the interrogation and detention programs, which were ended by
President Barack Obama.
According
to Feinstein, CIA officials then searched the computers to try to
determine how the congressional investigators gained access to the
information, Feinstein. Feinstein emphasized that the committee did
nothing improper to gain access to the internal reports.
During
an event at the Council on Foreign Relations, CIA Director John
Brennan denied the
allegations, saying "nothing could be further from the truth."
However, numerous Senate power players, including Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid, backed up Feinstein's charges and called for
increased scrutiny on the CIA.
"I
believe in the separation of powers. I support Sen. Feinstein
unequivocally," Reid told reporters in Capitol Hill on Tuesday.
"And I'm disappointed that the CIA is apparently unrepentant on
what I understand they did."
Other
senators from both parties also supported Feinstein's accusations.
"I
applaud Chairman Feinstein for setting the record straight today on
the Senate floor about the CIA's actions to subvert congressional
oversight," said Colorado Sen. Mark Udall, a member of the
Senate Intelligence Committee.
Udall
went on to say the CIA was "trying to hide the truth from the
American people about this program and undermine the Senate
Intelligence Committee's oversight role." Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden,
another member of the Intelligence Committee, called the CIA's
actions an "unprecedented invasion." Sen. Lindsey Graham, a
Republican from South Carolina, said Congress should declare "war"
if the allegations are true.
Feinstein's
criticism is particularly important because she has been one of the
staunchest defenders of intelligence agencies. This includes
full-throated defenses of the National Security Agency amid detailed
revelations of surveillance programs from former NSA contractor
Edward Snowden last summer. She called Snowden a traitor for
leaking the documents.
"When
you've lost Dianne Feinstein," one congressional source told
Business Insider, "you're in trouble as an intelligence agency."
Committee
staffers have for four years been sifting through the 6,000-plus
page CIA report on the Bush-era programs. Part of the report cites
information from the document detailing the "Panetta Review,"
which was named after former CIA Director Leon Panetta. CIA
officials said through press reports they did not make the document
available to Congress, something Feinstein denied. She pointed
to the press reports as the reason for giving her speech.
"Our
staff involved in this matter have the appropriate clearances,
handled this sensitive material according to established procedures
and practice to protect classified information, and were provided
access to the Panetta Review by the CIA itself," Feinstein said.
Thus
far, the White House has tried to walk a fine line between the two
warring factions by offering signals of support for both Feinstein
and Brennan. White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters
President Barack Obama has "full confidence" in Brennan,
though he also noted the White House supports the declassification of
the report.
Some
senators, too, were careful not to rush to judgment. Florida Sen.
Marco Rubio told
Bloomberg there
should be an "impartial investigation." Barbara Mikulski, a
Democrat from Maryland, simply called for "more facts."
Musical chairs. This won't amount to anything.
ReplyDelete