Heart
Defects in Gulf Tuna Seen Tied to 2010 BP Oil Spill
25
March, 2014
Crude
oil from BP
Plc (BP/)’s
2010 Gulf of Mexico spill may have led to heart defects and premature
death for tuna, researchers backed by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration report.
Exposure
to the oil may slow or cause an uncoordinated rhythm in the heartbeat
of developing Atlantic bluefin and yellowfin tuna and an amberjack
species, according to a study published yesterday in the Proceedings
of the National
Academy of Sciences.
Damaged hearts may reduce swimming performance, jeopardizing a fish’s
survival.
“The
timing and location of the spill raised immediate concerns for
bluefin tuna,” Barbara Block, a professor of biology at Stanford
University who helped write the study, said in a statement. “This
spill occurred in prime bluefin spawning habitats, and the new
evidence indicates a compromising effect of oil on the physiology and
morphology of bluefin embryos and larvae.”
The
April blowout of BP’s Macondo well gushed oil for 87 days, fouling
beaches from Florida toLouisiana and
forcing the U.S. to shut about 37 percent of the Gulf to fishing.
Most areas reopened in late 2010. It was the worst U.S. offshore
spill and spewed about 4.9 million barrels of oil and forced
London-based BP to sell about $38 billion in assets to pay for clean
up and compensating victims.
The
defect cited in the study may doom affected tuna later in life,
Jacqueline Savitz, vice president for U.S. Oceans for the environment
group Oceana, said in response to the report.
‘Extremely Unsafe’
“It’s
a real reminder that offshore drilling continues to be extremely
unsafe and leads to impacts on marine life,” Savitz said in an
interview. “Whether those fish were healthy enough to survive and
help rebuild struggling populations of bluefin tuna still remains to
be determined.”
Fish
exposed to crude oil may have permanent changes in heart shape that
reduce swimming performance later in life, said John Incardona, NOAA
research toxicologist and the study’s lead author.
“This
creates a potential for delayed mortality,” Incardona said in a
statement. “Swimming is everything for these species.”
Researchers
exposed tuna larvae raised in land-based hatcheries to oil collected
at the time of the spill. Developmental abnormalities were seen at
concentrations below those measured during the spill, according to
the study.
BP Response
“The
paper provides no evidence to suggest a population-level impact on
tuna, amberjack” or other fish from the ocean living in the Gulf,
BP spokesman Jason Ryan said in an e-mailed statement. “The authors
themselves note that it is nearly impossible to determine the early
life impact to these species.”
The
research is part of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment for the
Gulf ecosystem after the Deepwater Horizon spill. The findings
include contributions from researchers at NOAA, Stanford
University,
the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and
Atmospheric Sciences and the University of the Sunshine Coast in
Queensland, Australia.
In
September 2012, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service said Gulf
fisheries were rebounding, with fishermen landing larger catches
during the 2012 fishing season than they did in 2009, the year before
the spill.
“We
know from the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound that
recently spawned fish are especially vulnerable to crude oil
toxicity,” Nat Scholz, leader of the ecotoxicology program at
NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Seattle,
said in a statement. “That spill taught us to pay close attention
to the formation and function of the heart.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.