Ukraine
is About Oil. So Was World War I
by
Robert Freeman
8
March, 2014
Ukraine
is a lot more portentous than it appears. It is fundamentally about
the play for Persian Gulf oil. So was World War I. The danger lies in
the chance of runaway escalation, just like World War I.
Let’s
put Ukraine into a global strategic context.
The
oil is running out. God isn’t making any more dinosaurs and melting
them into the earth’s crust. Instead, as developing world countries
aspire to first-world living standards, the draw-down on the world’s
finite supply of oil is accelerating. The rate at which known
reserves are being depleted is four times that at which new oil is
being discovered. That’s why oil cost $26 a barrel in 2001, but
$105 today. It’s supply and demand.
Oil
recalls that old expression: “In the land of the blind, the
one-eyed man is king.” In industrial civilization, the nation that
controls the oil is king. And 60% of the known oil reserves are in
the Persian Gulf. That’s why the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003: to
seize control of the oil. Alan Greenspan told at least one truth in
his life: “I hate to have to admit what everybody knows. Iraq is
about oil.”
But
the U.S. lost the war in Iraq. Remember? The U.S. was going to
install a democracy and 14 permanent bases there. They’re not
there. The U.S. was run out after proving unable to pacify the
Islamic jihad it had unleashed under the pretext of searching for
non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Instead, Iraq allied itself
with Iran, its Shi’ite comrade-in-arms in the Muslim Wars of
Religion.
So
today, the battle for the Persian Gulf is being carried out through
its two regional powers, Saudi Arabia, the champion of Sunni Islam,
and Iran, the torch carrier for Shi’ite Islam. Think of the Wars
between the Protestants and Catholics in the 1500s. The U.S. backs
Saudi Arabia, as it has done since 1945, when Roosevelt cut a deal
with Ibn Saud to protect his illegitimate throne in exchange for the
House of Saud only selling oil in dollars.
Iran,
of course, is implacably hostile to the U.S. after the U.S. overthrew
Iran’s democratically elected president, Mosaddegh, in 1953 and
installed its own fascist puppet, the Shah of Iran. The Iranians
overthrew the Shah in 1979 and installed a fundamentalist theocracy
that continues to this day.
Iran’s
main ally in the region is Syria, which the U.S. has been trying to
overthrow for three years by helping the al-Qaeda-linked rebels that
are attacking Syria. Syria’s chief military patron is Russia, which
conveniently bailed Obama out of his childish “red line”
declaration last year, a declaration he had neither the military nor
political nor diplomatic capacity to carry out.
So,
the upheaval in Ukraine is really about the U.S. trying to weaken
Syria’s patron, Russia. If Russia is weakened, Syria is weakened.
If Syria is weakened, Iran is weakened. If Iran is weakened, the U.S.
has a better chance of seizing control of the world’s largest
reserves of oil. That is the Great Game that is going on here.
The
problem is the risk of escalation. It’s not at all fanciful to
imagine some ambitious Ukrainian colonel firing at Russian forces.
Russia fires back, decisively. This puts Ukraine at risk for its
European suitor, the EU. So NATO intervenes to try to intimidate
Russia. Russia retaliates to blacken NATO's nose. And before anyone
knows it, the U.S. is dragged into a shooting war where no one can
understand how it ends. This is almost exactly how World War I
started.
The
Germans were gunning for Persian Gulf oil via their relationship with
the Ottoman Empire. But this would have given Germany a choke hold on
England, which had only just converted its navy to oil. So, England
reversed its historical rivalry with France, in 1904, and with
Russia, in 1907, to try to contain Germany. But a minor,
unanticipated dust-up in the Balkans in the summer of 1914 escalated
into The Greatest War The World Had Ever Known.
In
a freak event, a Serbian teenager killed the heir-apparent to the
Austrian-Hungarian throne. So Austria-Hungary attacked Serbia. Russia
couldn’t stand idle as its sole Balkan ally, Serbia, was
humiliated. So it mobilized on Austria-Hungary, an effective
declaration of war.
Germany
moved to defend its ally, Austria-Hungary, by attacking Russia’s
ally, France. England, France’s ally, responded by declaring war on
Germany. Within less than one month of a minor incident in a minor
region of the continent, all the major powers of Europe were at war.
World
War I would inflict 27 million casualties through the
industrialization of human slaughter. It destroyed four great
empires, more than had expired in any single event, ever. Eleven new
nations were created in its aftermath, including Iraq, Jordan, Syria,
Lebanon, and Palestine. It was the event that shifted the locus of
global power from Europe to the U.S., where it has resided ever
since. It rearranged the architecture of global power more than any
event of the last thousand years.
So
the portent of Ukraine is a global strategic order hanging in the
balance. The U.S. must subdue Russia to gain control of the world’s
oil. It is the same strategic objective that is driving the U.S.’s
subversion of the democratically elected government in Venezuela: it
sits on one of the world’s largest reserves of oil. Indeed, all of
the U.S.’ aggressions on Iran, Syria, and Venezuela, and its
subversion of the democratically elected government of Ukraine, can
be understood in this context.
The
wild card in the whole fracas is China. China is the biggest customer
of Iranian oil, and the largest international investor in Venezuela.
These represent some of China’s moves to counter the U.S. attempt
to control the world’s oil. The potential escalation from Ukraine
as the U.S. pressures Syria, Iran, and Venezuela, inescapably
involves China. If China becomes involved, trying to defend its
allies and its supply of oil, it is anybody’s guess where it ends.
But it won’t be pretty.
Robert
Freeman is the author of The Best One-Hour History series which
includes World War I and The Vietnam War. He is the founder of the
national non-profit One Dollar For Life which helps American students
build schools in the developing world from their contributions of one
dollar.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.