Monday, 19 January 2015

Ukraine civil war news - 01/18/2015

Poroshenko rejected Putin’s artillery withdrawal plan, began assault - Kremlin



RT,
18 January, 2015

Kiev resumed its military assault in eastern Ukraine on Sunday despite receiving a proposal Thursday night from the Russian president that both sides of the conflict withdraw their heavy artillery, Putin’s press secretary said.

"In recent days, Russia has consistently made efforts to mediate the conflict. In particular, on Thursday night, Russian President Vladimir Putin sent a written message to Ukrainian President Poroshenko, in which both sides of the conflict were offered a concrete plan for removal of heavy artillery. The letter was received by President of Ukraine on Friday morning," president’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, said as cited by RIA Novosti news agency.

The latest developments in Ukraine connected with the renewed shelling of populated areas in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions cause grave alarm and put in jeopardy the peace process based on the Minsk memorandum,” Putin’s letter reads.

Putin suggested the immediate withdrawal of artillery with a caliber more than 10mm to the distance defined by the Minsk agreements.Russia is ready to monitor the fulfillment of these moves jointly with the OSCE, the letter concludes.

However, Peskov stressed, the Ukrainian leader rejected the plan without offering alternatives andmoreover started military actions all over again,” resulting in an absolute degradation of the situation in the southeast of Ukraine.”

A residential building in Donetsk damaged in the result of shelling by the Ukrainian army on January 18, 2015 (RIA Novosti/Mikhail Parhomenko)
A residential building in Donetsk damaged in the result of shelling by the Ukrainian army on January 18, 2015 (RIA Novosti/Mikhail Parhomenko)

READ MORE: Donetsk shelled as Kiev 'orders massive fire' on militia-held E. Ukraine

Russia's Foreign Ministry accused Kiev of using the ceasefire to regroup its forces, trying to take a course for further escalation of the conflict with a purpose to 'settle' it in a military way.”

We are deeply concerned by the fact that the Ukrainian side continues to increase its military presence in the southeast of the country in violation of the Minsk agreements,” the ministry said in a statement.

Ukrainian troops launched a massive assault on militia-held areas on Sunday morning.
The order from Kiev came after several days of violent clashes at the ruins of Donetsk International Airport – a scene of constant fighting over the months amid a shaky ceasefire between the Ukrainian army and local militia forces.



It was also the scene of a deadly bus shelling earlier this week; 12 people were killed on Tuesday when the bus was targeted at a Kiev-controlled checkpoint near the town of Volnovakha.


DNR forces denied accusations that local militia were responsible, saying the bus was targeted by Ukrainian troops.
A sharp escalation of clashes has also been reported across the frontline in Donetsk and nearby regions.
Russia has urged all members of the international community, specifically the OSCE, to demand that Kiev unconditionally give up its policy of forced suppression of the conflict.
There is an urgent need to cease hostilities and resume the 'silence' mode in Ukraine; the OSCE mission should play a special role in this,” the statement reads.

Moscow has stressed the necessity to continue talks within the contact group to fulfill the Minsk agreements, saying it will do all it can so that the group can meet at the beginning of next week.
We are calling on all members and those who have influence on the situation, to not let another breakdown [in talks happen],” the Foreign Ministry said.




Russia has expressed readiness “to use its influence on militia” in southeast Ukraine so they voluntarily agree to withdraw heavy armament from the frontline, so that its geographic coordinates correspond to Kiev's demands "to avoid more victims among the civilian population."

The Foreign Ministry has linked the deadly attacks in Donetsk and Kiev's “massive fire” order with the upcoming EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting on January 19.

It has noted that “such attempts coupled with the apparent provocation (similar to the situation with the Malaysian Boeing and the incident with a bus in Volnovakha) come, as a rule, on the eve of the European Union and other Western states meetings, which deal with the situation in Ukraine.”

The UN secretary-general, according to a spokesman, is “alarmed” by the severe escalation of fighting in eastern Ukraine, which has already caused numerous casualties, and has called for an “an immediate and full cessation of hostilities.”

Donetsk shelled as Kiev ‘orders massive fire’ on militia-held E. Ukraine


RT,
19 January, 2015


Ukrainian troops have launched a massive assault on militia-held areas Sunday morning after an order from Kiev, a presidential aide said. The self-proclaimed Donetsk republic’s leader accused Kiev of trying to restart the war.

The order to launch the offensive was issued early approximately at 6:00 am, according to Yury Biryukov, an aide to President Petro Poroshenko.
Today we will show HOW good we are at jabbing in the teeth,” he wrote on his Facebook page, a mode of conveying information favored by many Ukrainian officials.

In a later post he said: They are now striking a dot. Uuu…” in a reference to Tochka-U (‘tochka’ means ‘dot’ in Russian), a tactical ballistic missile, one of the most powerful weapons Ukraine so far deployed against rebel forces.

That wasn’t a dot but ellipsis. Strong booms,” he dded.

Reports from the ground confirmed a sharp escalation of clashes across the front line, with particularly heavy artillery fire reported at Gorlovka.
Locals in Donetsk said they haven’t heard such intensive shelling since summer,” Valentin Motuzenko, a military official in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, told Interfax news agency.

The Ukrainian military are using all kinds of weapons, Grad multiple rocket launchers, mortars…”Motuzenko said.

A source at the site told RT that a group of OSCE monitors have demanded that the Ukrainian military stop the shelling. The source added that there is a danger that the group may itself come under artillery fire.
A picture shows a building destroyed by shelling in eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk on January 18, 2015 (AFP Photo / Aleksander Gayuk)
A picture shows a building destroyed by shelling in eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk on January 18, 2015 (AFP Photo / Aleksander Gayuk)

READ MORE: OSCE identifies direction of deadly Donbass bus rocket


Aleksandr Zakharchenko, who was elected in November the prime minister of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, has accused Kiev of using the ceasefire to regroup their troops and boost their armaments, and now of trying to restart the all-out war.
It’s clear that Kiev is making an attempt to take revenge for the serious military defeat it took from the militia last year,” he added. Kiev always ignored our numerous suggestions to pull back heavy weapons from the disengagement line.”

At the moment, we are aware of five civilians killed,” the Donetsk administration said, adding that the shelling of the city by Ukrainian forces is still under way.
Several residential buildings, a shop and a bus station have been seriously damaged by artillery fire in the city, RIA Novosti reported.
The Putilovsky Bridge, which is located near the Donetsk airport, has also been destroyed in the shelling, RT’s Roman Kosarev reported from the scene.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
Путиловский мост

There were also reports of attacks on the town of Makeevka and several nearby villages.
The militia added that at least one shell hit a residential area in central Donetsk rather than the outskirts of the city.
Two people have died and 16 other received injureies after a Ukrainian shell exploded at bus station in city of Gorlovka, the press service of the People’s Republic of Donetsk said.
Several buildings in the city also suffered direct hits during the bombardment, including four schools and a kindergarten, the press service added.
Witnesses said that Kiev used aviation in the assault, with Sukhoi Su-24 warplanes jets seen in the air above Gorlovka.
The ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of Donetsk (DPR) has called upon the international community to address the worsening of the situation in southeast Ukraine and make every effort to stop unpunished mass murder in the heart of Europe."

The People’s Republic of Donetsk again suffered a treacherous and large-scale attack from Ukraine,”which is aimed at the destruction of the republic’s population and infrastructure, Aleksandr Kofman, DPR foreign minister, said in a statement.
The actions of the Kiev forces in Donetsk Region bear all characteristics of serious war crimes,”Kofman said.

Moscow is seriously concerned by the by the renewal of shelling of residential areas of the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk by Kiev forces, the Russian president’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, said.
Ukrainian city of Donetsk on January 18, 2015 (AFP Photo / Aleksander Gayuk)
Ukrainian city of Donetsk on January 18, 2015 (AFP Photo / Aleksander Gayuk)

The actions of the Ukrainian military in no way promote the settlement of the conflict between Kiev and the eastern regions, he said.


"Of course, the stance of the Russian side will be expressed. Of course, it involves serious concerns over the resumption of full scale warfare in Donetsk, including shelling of populated residential areas. And, of course, such a state of affairs doesn’t promote the fulfillment of the Minsk agreements [from September 5] and the further search for a peaceful solution,” Peskov told Govorit Moskva radio station.

The escalation comes after several days of violent clashes at the ruins of the Donetsk International Airport, a scene of constant fighting over the months of shaky ceasefire between Kiev’s troops and local militia forces.

The militia, who have accused the Ukrainian military of launching constant attacks on Donetsk from their positions at the airport, reported taking over the location this week. Kiev denied this report.
The Ukrainian Security and Defense Council confirmed the resumption of hostilities and that Kiev's objective was to recapture the airport.
Kiev launched it's retaliation days after President Poroshenko ordered a new wave of mobilization into the country’s armed forces. The government plans to hold at least three conscription campaigns over 2015 to sustain its military operations in the east.
The escalation of violence comes after a controversial incident at Kiev’s checkpoint near the town of Volnovakha, where 12 passengers were killed on Tuesday. Kiev blamed the deaths on the militia, saying it was hit by a Grad rocket. The DNR forces denied the accusations and said the bus was targeted by the Ukrainian troops themselves – either in a tragic incident or as a staged provocation – and said the damage visible in the picture of the bus is consistent with a less powerful weapon, possibly a landmine.
An OSCE observer team studied blast craters near the checkpoint and confirmed the direction they came from. Russia’s permanent representative to the OSCE, Andrey Kelin, said the direction runs along the disengagement line separating militia- and Kiev-controlled areas, which makes it difficult to determine who fired the rockets. The observers did not identify the type of rockets used.


Novorussia SITREP: Intensive combat operation all over the line of contact in Novorussia




18 January, 2015


Things look very bad today and very intensive combat operations, in particular artillery strikes, are reported everywhere in Novorussia.  At the very least, in the following locations:

1) Donetsk Airport: the Ukrainians attacked with a fairly large concentration of armor and under heavy artillery fire.  As for tonight (local time) all of these attacks have been successfully repelled but intelligences sources are reporting a sharp rise in the number of tanks and armored vehicles all around the Donestk airport.  The Novorussians are expecting attacks from Peski and Avdeevka.

2) The Ukrainian artillery has opened for almost everywhere along the front.  The Ukrainian airforce has also dropped several 500kg bombs from high altitude on the city of Gorlovka.

3) Novorussian units are returning fire and the outskirts of Mariupol have come under Novorussian artillery attacks.

4) The Chairman of the Novorussian Parliament, Oleg Tsarev, has declared that his sources indicate that the Ukrainian plan submitted to Poroshenko looked at a spectrum of options: the best one was to totally free Novorussian from all Novorussians, the minimal one was to cut-off Donetsk from Luganks and both of these cities from the Russian border.

5) Plenty of US made weapons have been recovered in the New Terminal of the Donestk airport.

6) There are reports that the Ukrainian forces are attempting to encircle Debaltsevo.

7) Putin's spokesman Dmitrii Peskov has declared that the Ukrainian side had rejected all Russian offers and presented no counter-proposals.  He concluded that the Ukrainians have chose the option of going to war.

8) Please click 
here for an high res updated map of combats.

9) The Ukrainians are now accusing the Novorussians of using "super-weapons" in Peski.  No, no nuclear devices (as the Ukie defense minister claimed were used south of Lugansk), but heavy-flame throwers of the 
Buratino TOS-1 type.  The Ukies speak of a "bloodbath in Peski" which, as J.Hawk, the translator for ForRuss noticed, is a sure sign of panic.

10) 
Initial reports seem to indicate the the Novorussian military has entered the town of Peski.

11) The head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the NAF, General Petrov, has declared that the Ukrainians have resumed ballistic missile strikes and that several Tochka missiles were fired today.

12) Zakharchenko has declared that "we are now engaged in a heavy counter-attack operation from Mariupol to Gorlovka".
Evaluation:

It appears certain is that Nazi junta as decided to resume combat operations.  Whether this is "an" attack or "the" attack remains to be seen, but the fact that ballistic missiles and bombers have been used seem to indicate that this one is qualitatively different.  My therefore leaning more towards the "the" attack option.

The situation around the airport has resulted in many poorly informed comments.  The following needs to be clarified.

a) The Donetsk airport has zero military value other then being a heavily fortified location near the city of Donetsk.  The main importance of the airport is symbolic as it was the place where by far the toughest and best Ukrainian units were sent into combat.

b) I am pretty sure that when the new terminal was taken over by the Novorussians (this indisputable as there is *a lot* of footage of this even) the junta generals grabbed their phone and began screaming into it demanding an immediate and massive counter attack.  This is what happened today.  According to Novorussian sources a total of 6 attack waves were repelled and 15 Ukrainian MBTs used in the attempt to retake the new terminal.

c) It is not surprising that this attack failed.  Heavily fortified objectives like the new terminal cannot be taken by tank and artillery fire, though they can be damaged by them.  Such objective can only be taken by very well trained and heavily armed infantry assault groups capable and willing to fight in very dangerous and difficult conditions.  Such groups, often called "assault/storming groups" are composed of experienced fighters which include machine-gunners, demolition-sapper combat engineers, snipers, anti-tank weapons, mortars, grenade-launchers, etc.  These are not the kind of units which the Ukrainians have a lot of, nor are these the kind of units which can be trained in a few weeks or even a few months.  This is why the Ukrainian assault have failed and most likely will continue to fail.

If this is indeed "the" much expected Ukrainian attack, then it fully confirms what everybody has been predicting: the Ukrainians are betting on large numbers of tanks, armored vehicles, artillery pieces and infantrymen to overwhelm the Novorussian defenders.  This is a losing strategy because not only will the by now highly experienced and combat hardened Novorussians perform infinitely better than the terrified and/or brainwashed Ukrainians with just a month or so of bootcamp under their belts, but because the inevitable bloodbath resulting from this kind of attack will rapidly break the willpower and morale of the Ukrainian side.  

The single most important factor here is not whether the Ukrainians will lose, but whether the Novorussians will be capable of winning without an over Russian intervention to support them.  My personal feeling is that yes, the Novorussians will succeed in beating back the Ukrainian assault and that Russia will not have to intervene openly (from what I hear the 
Voentorg is already working at full capacity, hence the TOS-1 in Peski).

I have to confess that I am nervous when I see Zakharchenko, Givi and Motorola at the very front lines quite literally within reach of the Ukrainian assault rifles.  I do fully understand why they feel that they have to do that, but I also get a knot in my stomach when I see them, especially all together a standing a few feet from each other.  If you are religious, please pray for these courageous men.

The Saker


A Grim and Fatalist Post-Holiday Sitrep for the Dream that Was "NovoRossiya" and the People of the Donbass

by Mark Sleboda



18 January, 2015



Russia will obviously not allow the West-backed and installed Kiev regime to conquer the rump "NovoRossiya" by military means. This latest "offensive" of theirs will either peter out quickly or will end very badly for them if it expands in the Spring.

But the NAF is even less a coherent and organized force than the UAF/batallions (and that's saying a lot because Kiev has very limited control of its warlords and their death squads ie the "battalions) - with no real offensive capability or logistics network. They are only really a defensive force thus far, though it must be said competent at that. The Kremlin, further, purposefully and when necessary, brutally, weeds their leadership and retards their supplies and growth to make sure they cannot become truly independent of either Russia or Ukraine.

The Kremlin has gone out of their way to prevent the NAF from seizing even the rest of Donetsk or Lugansk Republics, letting them keep only this tiny rump principality which is only a third of the territory of the respective two Republics. They wouldn't even let the NAF take Donetsk airport for over 7 months. This was obviously a signal to the West of their limited intentions and an attempt to prevent the conflict from spiraling into anything bigger. The West either appears to have not gotten that message or completely ignored and taken advantage of it. The people who truly suffered from this policy of the Kremlin's are the people of Donetsk and the rank and file NAF. They have hid and died under regular Putsch regime shelling directed through the airport into the residential districts of the city since the summer.

The NAF being "let off the leash" and, after far more of a struggle than it should have been, finally taking their own city's airport tells us two things. First the Kremlin is growing frustrated with both Kiev and the West as negotiations are going nowhere. This is a signal of their discontent, but a very limited one in scope. Second it is painfully obvious that the NAF without greater Russian support than the Russian government has ever given them, or intends to give them (whatever the hysteric and regular pronouncements from Kiev or the Western MSM and governments to the contrary), has NO offensive capability to speak of.

The Kremlin has no intent to either annex Donetsk and Lugansk and take economic responsibility for them and their people - nor to let them expand and become independent. Novorossiya literally has NO economy at all - nor do they have the ability to develop one without massive outside investment which neither the Kremlin nor the West has any intent of giving them. This is very important as NovoRossiya can NEVER be independent nor is it even sustainable in the medium term without one. There is literally NO money, no paying jobs, no economy. Even the standard of life under Putsch neoliberal "austerity" in Ukraine is far better at this point. The people of Donbass are suffering and the vulnerable literally starving to DEATH, and they cannot continue much longer like this.

The NovoRossiya "project" was NOT dreamed up in the Kremlin. It was an organic idea with historical roots that grew out of the desires of the people of the Donbass to get out of the post-Maidan Ukrainian madhouse and encouraged by various Eurasianist and nostalgic-Imperial/Orthodox elements of Russian civil society. Perhaps a few in the Kremlin inner circle of the more conservative patriotic bent tried to pick it up and run with it for a while - but it is obvious that for Putin it was never anything more than toy for leverage with the West to force a negotiated settlement in Ukraine. A "bad cop" approach. But it was never more than a bluff - and it appears that the West has (correctly) called him on it - whatever their public rhetoric on the matter to the contrary.

The Kremlin is very set on forcing rump Donetsk and Lugansk back into Ukraine at some point in the future under federalized conditions that suit the Kremlin's interest and influence. That is no longer enough in the minds of many of the NAF ranks or the people of Donetsk and Lugansk, who, rightly, have no desire to being forced under the Putsch rule or back in the same country with those who have been indiscrimately massacring them in their homes and on their streets for most of the last year (equivalent to asking the Kosovar Albanians to go back to Serbia after being bombed into independence by NATO) - but they may not have a real choice in the matter. The desires of the people of Donbass and the NAF and the interests of the Kremlin widely diverge on this. IMHO the Kremlin is playing a very cynical and coldly pragmatic game with the people of the Donbass. It further says a lot that they still prefer even that to rule or cleansing by Kiev. Pity the people of Donbass that they are not Crimea. The sad truth is that the people of Donbass want Russia much much more than the Kremlin wants them...

The Kremlin still keeps the NAF and NovoRossiya firmly under its leash. They truly are not getting much support from the Kremlin beyond that limited military aid assistance preventing them from being further military conquered from Kiev - but they are completely dependent on even that. The people of the Donbass are actually getting very little in the way of economic/humanitarian aid either from the Russian federal govt. The convoys are really a token effort only for PR purposes, and represent only a tiny tiny fraction of what the people of Donbass need or even are actually getting from Russia. The majority of what they are getting comes mostly from either Russian civil society (donations, organizations, the Church, and the Russian Republic's local governments like Kadyrov) or from the native oligarchs of the Donbass like Akhmetov who are still playing a cautious double game to try to come out ahead when this is all over and the dust settles.

The ONLY hope for NovoRossiya to ever become a real "independent" rump-state protectorate of Russia (like Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria) is from stupidly escalated and protracted military attempts from Kiev to subjugate Donbass, directed and armed by the West. But even then, after what has been going on for last half a year, it is almost impossible to imagine the level of bloodshed and carnage that would be necessary to push the Kremlin past the threshold on that score. So, no, not much hope for the people of "NovoRossiya" at all. Stillborn and still dying...
-------
Note by The Saker:

Just in order to avoid a deluge of misunderstandings, and even though I often post articles I disagree with, I will spell it out again: I do not share Mark's analysis of the situation, but he might be right and I might be wrong. I therefore find it very important to give his analysis as much visibility as possible. I am also personally grateful to Mark for accepting that he and I have different views and not turning that into a reason for personal hostility. I consider Mark a friend. The Saker


A Day of Battle and Sorrow: January 18 Summary of Events





1/19/2015 - Novorossia News Summary for January 18, 2015

By Cassad

http://news-mail.by/2015/01/19/novosti-novorossii-18-01-2015-itogi-dnya/

Translated from Russian by J.Hawk

1. The junta had lost the new terminal and, in spite of all the attempts to reclaim it, has suffered a tactical defeat here. Today’s attempt to strike at the junction between the village of Spartak and the concentration of airport buildings turned into a battle at the Putilovskiy bridge, where the breakthrough attempt was destroyed. Novorossia Armed Forces (NAF) infantry, which has held the new terminal for already a couple of days, with artillery support it quite comfortably defeated junta attacks. Junta’s failure does not mean that new such attempts will not occur over night or tomorrow.

2. At the same time NAF launched an attack on Peski, penetrating into the village and engaging in street battles, slowly but surely advancing. The enemy is putting up desperate resistance, which means that one cannot yet speak of full control over Peski. Both sides are actively using tube and rocket artillery and are bringing up reserves, which prevents a rapid resolution of the battle, which is now one of attrition. Junta artillery near Peski, Avdeyevka, and Krasnogorovka is coming under very heavy artillery strikes, as are junta positions near Maryinka. The intermediate objective of this effort is to reduce the intensity of bombardment of civilian areas. Our forces reached the outskirts of Avdeyevka, which suggests the village may be attacked overnight.

3. DPR and LPR are heavily suffering from terror bombardments of the fascist junta. Today Gorlovka suffered most of all, as enemy shells hit not only the outskirts but the center. Casualty numbers are still unknown, but it is likely to reach dozens. Enemy aviation struck Gorlovka for the first time since summer, which indicates the seriousness of junta’s intentions. Apart from shelling, the enemy conducted reconnaissance by force in front of Gorlovka, which failed. In spite of the high intensity of operations, the enemy has not introduced new forces into battle.

4. Neither side was successful in launching attacks in the vicinity of the Bakhmutka road and Slavyanoserbsk, due to the high level of artillery activity. Counterattack attempts toward Stanitsa Luganskaya following failed junta attacks along that sector likewise had no result, and the town is still held by the junta.
5. In spite of superiority of forces around Mariupol, NAF has not yet gone on offensive, preferring to shell enemy positions. Enemy reserves are still held in depth due to fear of attack by NAF mechanized forces.

6. The very visible Voyentorg activity is based on foundations laid down in November, when efforts were being made to increase the pace of its activity, including the training of its “workers” and fine-tuning of “instruments.” The pace of intensification was being delayed due to political considerations, but as soon as diplomacy reached its dead end which was evident after Milano [???], it received a green light and Voentorg began to work at a pace exceeding its August 2014 efforts. The preparations were not in vain, as already in November it was clear that the events were leading to war which, in spite of all the mantras to the contrary, will begin in winter and not in the spring, since the US is not about to wait for Putin to order Novorossia to surrender. Of course, those who observed these preparations already in November could poke fun at all those suggesting Putin was about to surrender Novorossia so it could join a “unified pro-Russian Ukraine.” I think that many will now understand my careful optimism in December-January. From the point of view of military planning, junta’s current behavior was being predicted since November. Warnings from DPR intelligence and defense ministry, Strelkov, Petrovskiy, and others (aside from collection of information through own channels) reached the “Voentorg leadership” one way or another, and the leadership undertook practical measures (some of which can be seen on Novorossia roads) to meet the possible threat. Naturally, knowledge by itself does not provide a 100% guarantee that countermeasures will be 100% effective (I heard certain doubts concerning this point from quite competent individuals), combat operations will show to what extent the threat was anticipated by those whose job it was to anticipate.

7. Naturally, the unfolding scenario is making it extremely difficult to return to the Minsk or Normandy format, particularly since the junta needed those formats only in the event it suffered a military defeat, and the US likewise does not need to conduct negotiations unless it has to. Therefore all attempts to steer the situation toward a political resolution will be torpedoed by Kiev and Washington. Russia did not want this scenario and strenuously tried to avoid it (and, moreover, will try to put the toothpaste back into the tube), but due to the circumstances and the insistent demands by the “fortress of Good” it could not avoid it and therefore now it has no choice but to win (by inflicting one or more defeats on junta forces) because a military defeat in Novorossia is unacceptable to Russia. One can only expect that as junta suffers defeats Russia will experience sharply increased diplomatic and economic pressure.

We can only wish NAF fighters and Voentorg workers bravery and successes in their battle against the fascist junta. They have a lot of work ahead of them. I want to warn against any “cakewalk” talk, as the struggle will be hard, prolonged, and bloody. One must not underestimate the enemy. But Novorossia will not return under junta rule.


Translator’s Note: I suspect the reason for the sudden Ukrainian return to military operations has less to do with US preferences than with the fact time is really not on Kiev’s side. The economy is tanking, default approaching, “partners” disinterested in rendering financial assistance. The longer Kiev waits, the greater the domestic unrest will become. Let’s not forget the warnings by Semenchenko and other battalion commanders that the troops are getting restless. Poroshenko desperately needs the war in order to distract domestic opposition (from his own stormtroopers, no less) and to help persuade foreign financial institutions this government is still capable of exerting control over Ukrainian territory. But that’s precisely why the war is so dangerous to the junta—one major setback, and the house of cards could well fall. It is not even clear how many forces Kiev still has at its disposal, other than those that have already been committed to battle. It's highly unlikely that the August 2014 losses had been made good. Also, it’s remarkable that no Western pressure has been exerted on Russia yet. While a few hard-liners here and there (e.g., Sweden’s former foreign minister Bildt) tried to raise alarm but so far at least they have been studiously ignored. Ukraine fatigue has set in and nobody knows what to do with the zombie state to the east of Poland whose interaction with the West consists of incessant begging for money, weapons, and sanctions against Russia, while failing to offer any financial benefit for its Western “benefactors.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.