I am posting this as a kind-of "for what it is worth" basis. One objection that has been stated is that if the room is sealed how could anyone have heard the conversation.
However, the whole thing is so preposterous that this version of events does make some sense to me.
THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY LOCKED AND FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY. IT HAS BEEN UNLOCKED AT THE PERSONAL REQUEST OF STEVE QUAYLE -- From a source deep inside the US Supreme Court as they discussed the pending Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania et. al. . . .
"Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.
The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn't trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
"Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"
"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then"
"You are forgetting what your role here is Neil,and I don't want to hear from the two junior justices anymore.I will tell you how you will vote."
Justice Clarence Thomas says "This is the end of Democracy, John."
When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn't seem fazed at all."
Clearly Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by the ATNIFA/Left-wing rioting. Well, one has to wonder if maybe he can intimidated more by some actions of the right wing?
I'm not going to bother doing that or anything else, and neither should any of you, but I'm just wondering, is all.
Weekends are a time that I like to give to just thinking and assessing. That is something that I have to do frequently as the world becomes a more and more insane place and all my assumptions of yesterday have to be assessed and,min some cases thrown out.
I just want to give a few examples.
Just a few weeks ago the Guardian printed an article about the results of an expedition to the Russian Arctic which revealed the extent of methane emissions in the Laptev Sea.
This elicited the Facebook fact checkers who decided the article was inaccurate and needed some context. The context was that, basically there is nothing to worry about.
Then yesterday I came across an article from the wonderful Siberian Times.
We have researchers from several countries confirming what I have known to be the case for some years. This is something I have been watching for several years.
The very people dissing this research are the very people who have been pouring cold water on serious field research because it flies in the face of their computer models that told us that what we are actually seeing now would happen in the year 2100. When that position became untenable they told us 2050.
We are literally being told by these experts - and I am thinking of the dreadful Dr. Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt who took over the reins at NASA Goddard Center from James Hansen- that we should ignore our lying eyes.
What is 30 years of field research in the Arctic by Peter Wadhams and the Russian researchers like Igor Semiletov when you can have pooped like Mann and Schmidt tweaking their computer models?
We have people across the board telling us that everything is not as bad as we would like to think, that these are just “seasonal variations”, showing us the graphs to demonstrate that this year was the SECOND lowest ice extent on record, pretending that thin ice and slush can be equated with sea ice extent in 2012, when the ice was still relatively intact.
Once again, we are being asked to ignore what we can see with our own eyes, to ignore the evidence of the Polar Stern who celebrated being able to sail unimpeaded through thin ice right through to the North Pole.
Never happened , you know. The graphs and the computer modelling tell us something different.
I often think why is this happening. Is it psychological, denial of something happening before our eyes? Is it professional jealousy? Is it just corruption - saying what is needed to keep the money flowing in.
Is it because the official narrative is one of supposed solutions to something that is occurring much more frequently than most would have suspected?
You can’t have a globalist agenda like 2030 if the ice is melting before our very eyes.
Much better to ignore the rapidly melting ice or the methane releases in the Laptev and concentrate on things like that have a longer time frame attached to them like the melting of the Greenland ice cap.
Sea level rise is happening, yes, but at a slower rate at is happening in the Arctic. That is all quite commensurate with “solutions” like the Great Reset which is being done in the name of sustainability and saving the planet - when it is really more about control of the many of the few and reinventing the economy in the interests of the tiny minority of technocrats who would rule over us.
I am positive that we have unleashed God knows how many positive feedbacks and crossed several trigger points such that it does not matter so much any more what we do.
We close the world economy down and emissions keep going up because they are coming from sources other than madmade industrial emissions such as huge wildfires across the globe.
So, it does not mean much to argue whether the melting icecaps are from CO2 emissions, geoengineering or terraforming by aliens.
It is happening.
The egregious lies from scientists, governments and media lead me to think that if I was starting from scratch and didn’t know what I know about the real situation I would be more sympathetic to some of the arguments of the denialists.
And I mean the real denialists because people like myself or Guy McPherson have always been tainted with the slur “climate change denier” by the very people who were only out in their projections BY ABOUT 80 YEARS.
We have been shown to more right than they but WE are the climate change deniers.
Go back to about 2008 when positive feedbacks were a theoretical affair and there was a lot more honesty.
Now we are swimming in a sea of lies.
I remember going to a lecture by a local glaciologist who showed a film made 19 years earlier that was quite accurate but went on to deny his own film and say everything was OK if only we would plant more trees. He became quite visibly angry when it was suggested that things were worse he was trying to display.
That was the public face. In private, shortly afterwards he expressed his fear of a world without glaciers.
GEOENGINEERING
That brings me to the question of geoengineering.
Some time back my partner, Pam and I started noticing skies like this;
I started investigating and asking people for explanations to this. In all my 60 years on this planet, living in both the North Island and the South island of NZ (and some other places as well), I have never seen anything like this.
Then I started to see things like this.
But even to ask the questions leads to instant ridicule. You dicover quickly what you can and cannot talk about. It can cost relationships.
Well, I have never been one to give in to the mob. Rather this nonsense spurs me on to question further even if that takes me to some lines of inquiry that I would never have followed otherwise.
It all comes down to following the evidence and seeing where it takes you.
For me it usually raises more questions rather than giving definitive answers which is what the overwhelming people crave.
People want to identify a source that they can follow to the end.
TOWARDS CIVIL WAR IN THE UNITED STATES?
And now we come to the situation in the United States. That is a truly partisan affair. I do not wish to smash my way into someone’s civil war. I may ended up being cancelled.
But I wish to provide a little of my own perspective from the outside.
I wish to show what the evidence, of at least what the evidence I see shows me.
In this I pay scant attention to what the mainstream is telling us to believe.
For example right through the US summer I have been following unruly mobs burn down their own city. The evidence is overwhelming.
Yet we have been told throughout that the riots are “mainly peaceful”.
And this, taken from a CNN broadcast shows the preposterousness of this.
And yet,once again we are being asked to believe what we are being TOLD by CNN, BBC, MSNBC etc., now joined by Fox News to ignore what our eyes tell us.
We are constantly told that the main threat comes from the far-Right and from the Proud Boys. It does make sense that there would be trouble from right-wing militias and I would expect this.
However, this is not what I am seeing. I followTwitter every day and have yet to see photographic evidence of the same violence,pillaging and looting that we see night after night from Antifa and BLM.
For me seeing is believing.
I am sure that if the Proud Boys we’re responsible for this type of violence we would see the evidence emblazoned across the pages of the press and yet we don’t see any more than individual cases. Instead we are being TOLD what to believe.
I always thought that the novel 1984 was supposed to be a warning and not a manual.
My interest in Trump was piqued when I saw he wanted to bring home at least some of the troops back from wars that have been ongoing for up to 20 years and by his attention to “drain the swamp” in Washington DC.
Instead 4 years later we see a president who has been neutralised and emasculated by the same Deep State to the extent that he has been reduced to tweeting and having his tweets censored by social media giants who are subject to no one.
I’m sorry. I just don’t see the dictator. I see the authoritarian instincts in Trump, yes, but not a dictator. Rather someone who has been rendered powerless.
Up to now, perhaps - but I will come to that in a few minutes.
When I look at how things might turn out I see nothing nothing but trouble.
If Biden, someone all the evidence indicates is as corrupt as hell and compromised by the Chinese Communist Party, then I can see and end to the Republic.
No one will ever believe the results of an election, ever again.
If the present situation is turned around and Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell are successful in the Supreme Court (I have heard that the Trump team are allowing the state courts to make their decisions but will present all the evidence they have been accumulating to the Supreme Court - certainly not to Tucker Carlson or any other media wonk - I expect the Democrats will burn the place down in their rage.
Then the real violence will begin.
I have been watching the decline of America and it’s empire for some time and it has little to do with Trump , Biden or any of the other players in all this.
When I was thinking of this a nursery rhyme came to mind
"Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. All the king's horses and all the king's men Couldn't put Humpty together again."
I would like to share two pieces of news (not conjecture) that I have picked up that give some idea of where things COULD be headed.
I picked both items up from watching TruNews. I grasped the significance immediately but no one else seems to have.
The first thing is that, subsequent to the sacking of Secretary of Defense,Mark Esper all the special forces (navy deals) have been consolidated under civilian leadership.
This is not a diktat of Donald Trump but something voted for by Congress 3 years ago but never acted on by the Pentagon.
I don’t think that the Trump administration has done this just to hand more power to Joe Biden. Instead, it allows them to deploy special forces to maintain order and bring down the insurrection as Trump wanted to do’previously in summer when mobs tried to burn St Johns church and to possibly storm the White House.
If it is as I think it is it would render Obama’s threat to put in the navy seals to drag Trump out of the WH, look pretty empty.
The second bit of news, from Friday is that their has been a reallocation of Supreme Court judges to circuits that encompass those states where the results of the election are open to question, to put it mildly.
I am telling you this because I think it is important and lays the media narrative that it is all done and dusted, and Joe Biden is on his way to the WH open to question.
God knows where this is all headed but from where I am sitting it does not look good at all.
Returning to climate change for a moment it may seem strange that I would not join the chorus of denunciation of Donald Trump. After all he has been absolutely distastrous for anything environmental.
Everyone I watch is pinning their hopes on Biden. He’s going to “save the world”.
But once again we have rhetoric and reality just as we had with Barack Obama who spoke beautiful words about climate change and the environment but turned around and DID THE OPPOSITE.
So now Biden has appointed his climate change spokesperson who, it turns out is straight out of the oil industry.
But Joe’s going to save the world. Yeah, right!
I dislike hypocrisy and double standards above all and in Trump we know what we have.
But between you, me and the lamp post I don’t think either of them is going to do diddly squat for the planet or the environment and it is nothing but the most extreme form of delusion to think one of them will.
I could see the significance immediately and sent it out to some of my social media contacts but not one of them showed the slightest interest; in fact one person sent back a wisecrack comment so quickly he could not possibly have listened to more than a few minutes.
So what is it all about?
Back in June when Portland and Seattle were burning and there was an attempt to burn down St.John's church in Washington DC (remember when Trump visited and was escoriated for it?) and a threat to surround or storm the White House Trump said he wanted special forces to respond to the situation.
General Milley and then secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, refused on the grounds that would "politicise" the military.
I remember the day when this happened and Rick Wyles said, "the Republic has fallen". You can refresh your memory here:
Well, in recent days the Trump administration have taken a provision passed 3 years ago by Congress to provide more civilian oversight over special ops (one which the Pentagon failed to act on) and have, in a particularly legal way separated special forces from the navy, army etc. and consolidated them under the command of the acting Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller.
See here....
More than three years after Congress mandated that the Defense Department elevate its civilian head of special operations to the same level as a military service secretary, that order has finally been carried out.
Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller on Wednesday signed a memo realigning the assistant defense secretary for special operations/low-intensity conflict to report directly to him, as the Army, Navy and Air Force secretaries currently do.
“I also want to highlight that this particular change has been analyzed, debated and refined over the course of the past 30 years,” Miller said during a ceremony at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
WASHINGTON — Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller on Wednesday ordered the Pentagon’s top civilian overseeing the military’s special operations community to report directly to him, effectively elevating U.S. Special Operations Command to the same level of the Pentagon’s military departments.
The change makes the assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low intensity conflict a service secretary-like position responsible for the oversight and advocacy of the military’s special operations forces, said Miller, who is expected to serve in the Defense Department’s top job only about two months.
At the 6:29 time mark, Miller says: (emphasis added)
At the same time, should any maligned actors underestimate our resolve or attempt to undermine our efforts, we will not hesitate to restore deterrents and defeat any and all threats.
As we implement the President’s orders, we also recognize that transitions and campaigns are fraught with risk and unexpected challenges and opportunities. That is why I am here today to announce that I have directed the special operations civilian leadership to report directly to me instead of through the current bureaucrat channels. This historic step finalizes what Congress has authorized and directed and will put Special Operations Command on par with the military services for the first time.
He specifically invoked “transitions and campaigns,” and although the word “campaign” typically refers to a military campaign, paired with the term “transitions,” this now seemingly refers to Presidential transitions and political campaigns.
This appears to be a dog whistle to other patriots throughout the DoD, broadcasting the fact that patriots are now in charge at the DoD, and they now directly command U.S. special forces assets. In other words, those assets have just been removed from the control of the deep state swamp bureaucrats that haunt the halls of the Pentagon, rubbing elbows with John Bolton and other swamp slugs in the hope of starting more wars.
Miller announced the move during a visit to the Army’s special operations home at Fort Bragg, N.C., his first official visit as defense secretary since he took the job Nov. 9 as former Defense Secretary Mark Esper was fired by President Donald Trump via Twitter.
“This reform will immediately improve agility to the department and the command and will enable us to streamline the information flow, enhance decision-making and more adaptively and adeptly support our commanders and their superb soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines,” Miller said in brief, prepared comments.
CONCLUSION
This is a story that has been totally ignored by the mainstream media but also by most alternative media sites.
It seems to me that this makes a disciplined (and loyal) military force available to the Trump administration. On the face of it this COULD be seen as a move towards dictatorship but for the fact that this was a measure already passed by Congress 3 years ago and the times are anything but 'normal' - there is an ongoing globalist coup underway to try and make the world safe for the Great Reset and the New World Order by removing the biggest hurdle to that aim - President Donald J. Trump.
In the context of the above what are we to make of the following?
Update (2130ET): As the evening has progressed, so has the violence - almost entirely committed by leftist thugs against conservatives
What was that about unity?
* * *
Massive crowds of people converged at Freedom Plaza in Washington on Saturday, joining other rallies around the country to show support for President Donald Trump and ask for fairness in the election process.
As The Epoch Times' Allen Zhong reports, the participants marched to the U.S. Supreme Court holding signs that read “Stop the Steal,” “Make America Fair Again,” and “Trump 2020.” Before the start of the march, the crowd heard speeches from prominent Trump supporters including Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and My Pillow founder Mike Lindell. Several other prominent figures including Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) and former Trump advisor Sebastian Gorka were also on the speaking list.
Participants chanted slogans calling to “stop the steal,” which is also the name of the grassroots movement organizing the event in part. Organizer Ali Alexander told The Epoch Times in a previous interview that the events are a grassroots effort by a coalition of about a hundred activists and influencers to show “support for President Trump and fair elections and transparent counting.”
Similar events, although smaller in scale, were organized in around 50 other states on the same day.
Everything was very peaceful (not just mostly peaceful) until the crowds started to disperse and groups of BLM and Antifa activists began to appear, agitating attendees, and eventually turning to violence... even against children.
As The Post Millennial reports, some footage is very disturbing and depicts a little girl being assaulted.
All out violence did not occur until people began dispersing. Some footage depicts a man physically assaulted, resulted in a head wound.
.
DC: A man was physically assaulted in front of Union Station
His face is bloodied from the physical assault pic.twitter.com/Dxz2BS1ytB
— Drew Hernandez (@livesmattershow) November 14, 2020
Other footage shows a young Trump supporter fleeing for safety as he is stalked by Antifa. He eventually sees police and yells for help.
The most disturbing piece of footage depicts a family being attacked by Antifa. A mother is seen attempting to flee the area with her small daughter. He daughter is eventually thrown to the ground in the middle of a fight.
More footage depicts Antifa stomping on a mans head.
Some footage shows people crying in fear as they are pursued by the militants.
It remains unknown how many individuals have been arrested but some footage depicts the police arresting people.
So - when will the media admit that the boarding up of stores/businesses/homes ahead of the election was not out of fear of a Biden victory, but a Trump win and the inevitable mostly-non-peaceful attacks and looting that would inevitably follow.
Perhaps this is why Floridian Norma Scott says she will support Trump until the end...
Norma had been vocal about her support for President Donald Trump before the election, and sees no reason to stop now. “I’m supporting Trump right up until the very end,” Scott said in her Trump shirt and buttons, carrying a flag.
Posts
