Iranian Oops: US may have broken own sanctions by buying Tehran’s oil
There
is a high probability that US sanctions against Iran have been
violated by its own army. Part of the $1.55 billion in fuel the US
bought from Turkmenistan for the Afghan army in the last five years
may have originated in Iran.
RT,
1
February, 2013
A
report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan
Reconstruction (SIGAR) suggested that “despite
actions taken by DOD to prevent the purchase of Iranian fuel with US
funds, risks remain that US economic sanctions could [have been]
violated” from
2007 to 2012.
Most
of the fuel for domestic Afghan consumption comes from neighboring
Iran. Because of the US sanctions on Tehran restricting the trade of
Iranian oil and petroleum products, the ISAF has been required to
abide by the regulations and buy petrol from eight Afghan-owned
companies that deliver petroleum from Turkmenistan, which borders
both Iran and Afghanistan.
The
SIGAR report also acknowledged there are no plausible oversight
mechanisms to make sure Iranian petroleum products are not included
in future fuel purchases.
Turkmenistan
is a major regional oil producer, which also trades for petroleum
products made in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Russia and Iran. Petrol
vendors in Turkmenistan use flexible supply schemes, meaning that
fuel of various origins could potentially be blended together.
In
response to a draft of SIGAR report, the US Embassy in Kabul stated
that “it
is possible that if blending is taking place in Turkmenistan it could
contain some Iranian fuel,” but
refused to admit that fuel imported from Russia could also be blended
with Iranian fuel prior to its import into Afghanistan.
“All
fuel imports carry a ‘verified Fuel Passport’ from the refinery,
which provides information on the origin, quantity, quality, and
specifications of the fuel,” the
embassy explained.
“Suppliers
are unlikely to blend Iranian fuel, or any other product, with other
sourced fuel because of the potential that blending could cause
product deviation from specification standards and potentially cause
a rejection of the entire shipment,” the
embassy said.
In
2012, the Pentagon reportedly spent over $800 million on imports from
Turkmenistan, most likely for fuel purchases.
Vladimir Kremlev for RT
Iran escaping sanctions
Western
sanctions have taken their toll on Iran: Tehran was formerly OPEC's
second-largest oil producer, exporting 2.2 million barrels of oil
daily. The sanctions more than halved that figure, to 890,000 barrels
of oil exported a day by September 2012.
The
Iranian economy has lost billions of dollars in revenue, plunging to
decades-low figures. The value of the national currency, the rial,
has taken a kamikaze dive; the Iranian leadership, including
incendiary President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was forced to publicly
admit the sanctions were having an effect.
But
Tehran has quickly recovered from the US-EU sanctions imposed on its
oil trade. By the end of last year, Iranian crude oil exports rose
again to 1.4 million barrels per day. Most of the Iranian oil is sold
to Asian countries such as China, India and Japan, where demand for
energy is growing. The expansion of Iran’s tanker fleet also helped
the Islamic Republic circumvent the sanctions.
The
US believes that the most common trick Iran uses to dodge sanctions
is ship-to-ship transfers (STS), in which large tankers leaving
Iran’s ports offload Iranian oil to smaller vessels. Then, the
Iranian oil is blended with that of another country to disguise it.
After that, new shipping documents are issued, giving the blended oil
shipment a new identity, Reuters reported.
The
US has scrambled to enact countermeasures on the news that its
sanctions are being skirted. Reuters reported on Thursday that the US
State Department is planning to target companies that deliberately
disguise Iranian oil shipments to evade Western sanctions.
Also,
an unnamed US official said that the US authorities are “increasingly
aware of this STS issue,” and
that companies involved in covert deals for Iranian oil will be
punished. Sanctions violators could be prohibited from trading with
the US companies, for example.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.