Radioactive
waste leaking from tanks at Washington state nuclear site
Governor
says news is 'disturbing for Washingtonians' but officials deny any
immediate danger of contaminating Colorado river
23
February, 2013
Six
underground storage tanks at a nuclear facility in Washington state
are leaking radioactive waste, but there is no immediate risk to
human health, officials say.
The
newly discovered leaks, at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, come one
week after the US energy department revealed that radioactive waste
was found to be escaping from one tank at Hanford.
The
seeping waste adds to decades of soil contamination caused by past
storage tank leaks at Hanford and threatens to further taint
groundwater below the site. However, officials said there was no
immediate danger of any pollution of the Columbia river.
Washington's
state governor, Jay Inslee, said he was told on Friday by outgoing
energy secretary Steven Chu that six of the aging, single-walled
tanks were leaking radioactive waste.
"There
is no immediate or near-term health risk associated with these newly
discovered leaks, which are more than 5 miles (8km) from the Columbia
River," Inslee said. "But nonetheless this is disturbing
news for all Washingtonians."
The
governor said Chu told him that his department initially missed the
other five leaking tanks because staff there did not adequately
analyse data.
"This
certainly raises serious questions about the integrity of all 149
single-shell tanks with radioactive liquid and sludge at Hanford,"
he said.
The
energy department issued a brief statement acknowledging that six
waste tanks were found to be leaking and adding that there was "no
immediate public health risk".
Four
of the tanks in question, including the two biggest of the group, are
known to have leaked waste in the past as well, Suzanne Dahl, the
tank waste treatment manager for the state Department of Ecology,
told Reuters.
"It
points to the age of the tanks and how there's going to be an
increased probability of this happening in the future," she
said. "When waste is in the tanks, it's manageable. Once it's
out of the tanks and in the soil, it's much harder to manage it,
remove it, and down the road you're adding to contamination in the
groundwater that already exists."
The
energy department said last week that declining liquid levels in one
tank at Hanford showed it was leaking at a rate of 150 to 300 gallons
(568 to 1,136 litres) per year. It subsequently informed state
officials that a second, larger tank was leaking at about the same
rate, while the four smaller tanks were leaking at a rate of about 15
gallons per year, Dahl said.
The
department said that monitoring wells have identified no significant
changes in concentrations of chemicals or radionuclides in the soil.
The
two biggest tanks at issue have capacities of about 750,000 gallons
and 500,000 gallons, while the four others are designed to hold up to
55,000 gallons, Dahl said. All were constructed many decades ago.
The
586 sq m (1,518 sq km) Hanford reservation was established near the
town of Hanford in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, the US
government program that developed the first atomic bombs.
Production
of plutonium materials at the site continued through the Cold War and
ended there in 1989 as work shifted to cleanup of nuclear and
chemical waste at Hanford, considered one of the largest and most
complex such projects in the country.
Weapons
production at the site resulted in more than 43m cubic yards of
radioactive waste and 130m cubic yards of contaminated soil and
debris, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency, which
says that approximately 475bn gallons of contaminated water have been
discharged into the soil.
As
part of the cleanup, as much remaining liquid waste as possible was
pumped out of the older single-shell tanks into sturdier
double-walled tanks in a process completed in 2005, Dahl said.
But
sludge, mud-like waste and pockets of liquid remained behind in the
older tanks, and it is that material that was found to be seeping in
the soil again from six tanks, she said. According to the DOE, one of
those tanks currently holds about 447,000 gallons of radioactive
sludge
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.