We all know who the real pirates are.
Sea Shepherd anti-whalers now labeled 'pirates' by US fed court
RT,
February
27, 2013 18:13
A
US federal court has branded the conservationist group Sea Shepherd
as pirates, and ordered them to cease their operations at sea,
opening the door for Japanese whalers to pursue legal action in the
United States against the activists.
Chief
judge Alex Kozinski wrote in an 18-page opinion that “you don’t
need a peg leg or an eye patch” to be classified as pirates.
"When
you ram ships, hurl glass containers of acid, drag metal-reinforced
ropes in the water to damage propellers and rudders, launch smoke
bombs and flares with hooks, and point high-powered lasers at other
ships, you are, without a doubt, a pirate," he said, adding that
the group’s actions were the “very embodiment of piracy.”
But
Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson says Kozinski's belief that he is
a "pirate" is one-sided and irrelevant.
"That's
an opinion, it's certainly not a judgment," he told
AAP. "He didn't mention anything in there about the fact
that the Japanese have destroyed one of our ships (the Ady Gil in
2010), they've thrown concussion grenades at us, hit us with water
cannons and laser beams."
Watson
added that contrary to Kozinski's claims, Sea Shepherd has not rammed
a single Japanese whaling vessel.
"The
judge obviously has not seen the evidence or the facts; he's just
making an opinion based on his own personal prejudices," he
said.
Earlier,
Japanese whalers from the Institute of Cetacean Research filed legal
action in the US to stop the Sea Shepherd’s anti-whaling activism.
But District Judge Richard Jones sided with the activists, leading to
a ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of
Appeals, which reversed the original decision and criticized Jones.
The
Sea Shepherd ship Bob Barker (C) sandwiched between Japanese whaling
ship Nisshin Maru (L) and whaling fleetТs fuel tanker. (AFP Photo)
The
US ruling also criticized Jones, stating that he was “off base”
when arguing that the protesters' tactics were nonviolent because
they did not target people, just ships and equipment: “The
district judge's numerous, serious and obvious errors identified in
our opinion raise doubts as to whether he will be perceived as
impartial in presiding over this high-profile case.”
The
case will now be transferred to another judge.
The
Sea Shepherd ship Steve Irwin smoke stacks billowing steam after
Japanese whalers and militant conservationists clashed dangerously
in icy waters off Antarctica. (AFP Photo)
Both
sides have accused each other of damaging vessels during the
standoff. The activists also claimed that the Japanese whalers have
been using water cannons and stun grenades against them, and that
Japan has deployed a military icebreaker to threaten them.
Japan
has denied the reports; Australia is currently taking legal action
against the country for its whaling activities.
Sea
Shepherd vessels are known for chasing down Japanese whalers to
disrupt their annual hunt and prevent the mammals from being killed.
They set sail from Australia, and try to block or attack Japanese
whaling vessels.
Whaling
for commercial purposes has been banned for the past 25 years, but
Japan still sends ships on annual hunts. Tokyo has argued that such
hunts are for scientific research only, which is permitted by an
international treaty, but several media reports have indicated that
the Japanese hunts have no scientific value.
The
Nisshin Maru (R) firing water cannons at the Sea Shepherd ship Steve
IrwinТs smoke stack as Japanese whalers and militant
conservationists clashed dangerously. (AFP Photo)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.