CISPA’s back: Hacking, online espionage resurrect cybersecurity bill
RT,
9
February, 2013
The
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection act (CISPA) will be
reintroduced before the US House next week following a spate of cyber
espionage and hacking attacks. Civil liberties advocates have
criticized the bill for violating privacy laws.
The
House Intelligence Committee’s Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and
ranking member Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) will attempt to
breathe new life into CISPA on Wednesday.
The
bill will be identical to the version of CISPA that passed the House
last spring, but was defeated on the Senate floor in August mainly
because the upper house was hammering out its own cyber security
bill.
CISPA
would allow for the voluntary sharing of Internet traffic between
private companies and the government. The bill is purportedly
intended to help the US government, especially the intelligence
community, to investigate cyber threats and ensure the security of
networks against cyber attack, especially those emanating from
countries like China and Iran.
The
bill would also allow the federal government to provide classified
cyber threat information to private firms, and protect them from
legal action in the course of sharing private information.
Opponents
of the bill say it would allow companies to hand over a user’s
private browsing information to the government, allowing authorities
to spy on American citizens rather than simply track down cyber
threats.
Fight
for the Future, a non-profit group “working to extend the
Internet’s power for good,” has already kicked off anonline
petition asking
voters to call their representatives on the House Intelligence
Committee and express their opposition to the bill.
Rogers
claimed a recent series of cyber attacks against US banks and
newspapers galvanized Congress to once again pass the information
sharing bill.
“American
businesses are under siege," the
Beltway tech blog The Hill cites Rogers as saying.
"We
need to provide American companies the information they need to
better protect their networks from these dangerous cyber threats.
It is time to stop admiring this problem and deal with it
immediately,” he
continued.
Several
leading US papers, including the New York Times, the Wall Street
Journal and the Washington post have all recently fallen victim to
cyber spying.
Following attacks on the Federal Reserve’s website as
well as on several US banks, The head of Homeland Security Janet
Napolitano warned
in January that
a "cyber
9/11",
which could cripple critical infrastructure like water, electricity
and gas, may happen "imminently".
"We
shouldn't wait until there is a 9/11 in the cyber world. There are
things we can and should be doing right now that, if not prevent,
would mitigate the extent of damage," she
warned before urging Congress to pass cyber security legislation.
During
his first major policy speech on cyber security in October, Defense
Secretary Leon Panetta took a similar rhetorical route, warning the
United States faced the prospect of “a
cyber-Pearl Harbor.”
“An aggressor
nation or extremist group could gain control of critical switches and
derail passenger trains, or trains loaded with lethal
chemicals," Panetta
said.
"They
could contaminate the water supply in major cities, or shut down the
power grid across large parts of the country."
Panetta
claimed that CISPA fell "victim to legislative and political
gridlock, "
urged that the bill should be passed “to safeguard our national
security.”
The
White House threatened to veto CISPA last year, saying the bill would
not protect the nation’s critical infrastructure or guarantee the
privacy of consumer information that could be shared by companies.
Despite
reticence about CISPA, President Obama is expected to issue an
executive order aimed at strengthening US cyber security next week.
The
order, which is expected to be released after Obama delivers his
State of the Union address on Tuesday, will purportedly set up a
voluntary program of cyber security standards for firms operating
critical US infrastructure, two former officials briefed on the plan
told Bloomberg.
In
October, Obama signed a separate directive authorizing the National
Security Agency and other military units to take more aggressive
action to defeat attacks on the country’s web of government and
private computer networks
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.