Tuesday, 5 February 2013

The Lies of the National Government


I'm not in favour of the infinite growth approach of either major party. I am, however, in favour of accuracy and the National Party have continued to lie about the legacy of the Helen Clark government.

Frank McSkasy has done a great job in bringing this material together. Political amnesia is a terrible thing.

Bill English – do you remember Colin Morrison?
.
A message to the Hon. Bill English;


From the NZ Herald on 27 January, uttered by Bill English,
“…On top of that, Labour still hasn’t apologised for their wasteful policies the last time they got their hands on the economy.
See: IBID
.
Firstly, let’s review recent history in decidely more accurate terms,

.
.
The IMF (International Monetary Fund) chart above shows that from 2000 to 2008, the Labour government paid down debt, from 33.4% in 2000 to 17.4% in 2008  (a near-halving of our sovereign debt) to  when National took the reigns of government.
Some will even recall that Labour Finance Minister, Michael Cullen, posted several surpluses during his tenure as Finance Minister,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Just as well that Cullen resisted strident calls for massive tax cuts. Instead, perhaps being the wisest man in the decade, realised that common sense demanded that we pay down our sovereign debt, rather than splurge out on an almighty cash-lolly scramble.
Had Cullen yielded to calls for tax cuts instead of addressing our debt, our current sovereign debt would probably be approaching  Greece’s.
But Bill English and other National/ACT sycophants don’t want us to know this. It makes Labour look good. And that’s the last thing they want.
After 2008, as National gave away tax revenue on the form of two unaffordable tax cuts in 2009 and 2010, debt skyrocketed from 17.4% to 37% of GDP.
Now, if  one was to use the same mis-information as Bill English, John Key, et al, I could shout from the roof-tops that the rise in debt was due wholly to National’s mis-management of the government books.
The reality, of course, is that the 2007/08 Global Finance Crisis – as well as National’s incompetance in giving away tax cuts we could ill afford – both had a part to play in our increased borrowing.
Secondy, let’s deal with English’s claim,
“…On top of that, Labour still hasn’t apologised for their wasteful policies the last time they got their hands on the economy.
Budget expenditures from the early 1990s to 2012 reveal an interesting story,

.
.
The early 1990s (characterised by Finance Minister, Ruth Richardson) was one of massive cuts to health, welfare, sale of State houses,  and other social services. The same can be said of the late 1990s, where de-regulation; so-called “reforms“; cuts to state services;  and increasing User Pays led to growing poverty and the widening income gap.
Eventually, those cuts to state services had dire consequences. For example, the health sector was particularly badly hit,
.
.
More health changes tipped – (8 March 1997)
.
Must pay for ‘wants’ – (19 July 1997)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Health spending rates poorly  – (24 Aug 1999)
.
The Health “reforms”, along with chronic under-funding, had their inevitable consequences,
.
.
Died waiting for by-pass  (6 April 1998)
.
Rau Williams and Colin Morrison – both with entirely different lives;  living at opposite ends of the country; one Maori, the other Pakeha – both suffered the same fate. They died because government cutbacks on spending (see red square in  above chart) had reduced the Health budget, and as media reports above show – were impacting harshly on our society.
These two men – and  perhaps others who died quietly, shunning the glare of publicity – died on Bill English’s watch.  As Minister responsible for Crown Health Enterprises and later Minister of Health, English could not shift responsibility to anyone else.
At one point, English was forced to concede that the Health system and funding mechanism was “flawed”,
.
.
.
Tragically, Mr English’s “Road to Damascus” experience was too late for Mr Williams and Mr Morrison and their families.
Is it me, or does  it seem that everything National touches turns into one, big, steaming cow-patty?
Finally, by 1999 the country had had enough. On 27 November, the country went to the polls and National and their coalition ally, NZ First, were roundly defeated.
The incoming Labour-Alliance government was faced with a crippled health sector (amongst other state services that had been cut back) that had been impoverished and  was struggling to perform it’s most basic core services,
.
.
.
.
.
A crisis that could only be remedied by a hands-on government prepared to make appropriate funding decisions,
.
.
.
.
$1.5b injection for health – (9 Dec 2001)
.
Upshot of this, Mr English?
Any increase in funding of state services was necessary. After savage cuts, National created a situation where our healthcare system was unequivocally unsafe.
In fact, it had  become lethal. People were dying for lack of appropriate medical intervention.
That was the legacy of the National Government, 1989 – 1999.
So before Mr English or any of his cronies complain that Labour  spent more than National did – damn right they did. And the increased health funding under Labour probably saved an unknown number of lives.
Tell us, Mr English, do you remember Colin Morrison and Rau Williams?
.
*
.
Addendum 1
By the way, Mr English, with reference to your criticism of the Green Party regarding job creation,
And to make it worse, at the same time their coalition partners the Greens are up in Auckland busy working out how to stop everything they don’t like – which includes everything to do with growth and jobs.


There’s no need to point the finger at the Greens and blame them for lack of growth and jobs. The  inept National Party are quite efficient at stifling the economy and creating rising unemployment,
.
.
.
No need to invoke the Green Party (who aren’t even part of the National-led coalition) – it seems National is quite adept at grinding  the economy into the ground.
Credit where it’s due, Mr English, credit where it’s due.
Addendum 2
The Bolger-led National cut taxation-revenue by implementing two tax cuts, in 1996 and 1997. (see: Reserve Bank – New Zealand’s remarkable reforms)
Why does this sound more and more familiar?!
.
*
References
Treasury: Briefing to Incoming Government 1996 (12 Oct 1996)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.