Insight:
Electric cars head toward another dead end
4
February, 2013
Are
electric cars running out of juice again?
Recent
moves by Japan's two largest automakers suggest that the electric
car, after more than 100 years of development and several brief
revivals, still is not ready for prime time - and may never be.
In
the meantime, the attention of automotive executives in Asia, Europe
and North America is beginning to swing toward an unusual but
promising new alternate power source: hydrogen.
The
reality is that consumers continue to show little interest in
electric vehicles, or EVs, which dominated U.S. streets in the first
decade of the 20th century before being displaced by gasoline-powered
cars.
Despite
the promise of "green" transportation - and despite
billions of dollars in investment, most recently by Nissan Motor Co -
EVs continue to be plagued by many of the problems that eventually
scuttled electrics in the 1910s and more recently in the 1990s. Those
include high cost, short driving range and lack of charging stations.
The
public's lack of appetite for battery-powered cars persuaded the
Obama administration last week to back away from its aggressive goal
to put 1 million electric cars on U.S. roads by 2015.
The
tepid response to EVs also pushed Nissan's high-profile chief
executive, Carlos Ghosn, perhaps the industry's most outspoken
proponent of battery cars, to announce in December a major strategic
shift toward more mainstream gasoline-electric hybrids, which
overcome many of the shortcomings of pure EVs.
The
move was widely seen as a tacit acknowledgement by Ghosn that his
all-or-nothing, multibillion-dollar bet on EVs is falling far short
of his ambition to sell hundreds of thousands of battery-powered
Nissan Leafs.
Instead,
Nissan plans to follow rival Toyota Motor Co, the world's largest
purveyor of hybrids, which now is poised to leapfrog pure EVs
altogether to pursue what might be the next big green-tech
breakthrough: pollution- and petroleum-free fuel-cell cars that
convert hydrogen to electricity.
Vice
Chairman Takeshi Uchiyamada, the "father of the Prius" who
helped put hybrids on the map, said he believes fuel-cell vehicles
hold far more promise than battery electric cars.
"Because
of its shortcomings — driving range, cost and recharging time —
the electric vehicle is not a viable replacement for most
conventional cars," said Uchiyamada. "We need something
entirely new."
TOYOTA'S
LONG LEAD
In
the race to identify the Next Big Thing in automotive technology, the
stakes are enormous.
For
example, Nissan, with French partner Renault, has committed $5
billion for development and manufacture of EVs and batteries — a
risky bet that could take years to pay off — while Toyota has spent
an estimated $10 billion or more over the past 16 years to develop,
build and market an ever-expanding range of hybrids, led by the
popular and now profitable Prius.
While
neither Nissan nor Toyota is likely to pull the plug on electric
cars, it is clear from their recent moves that both companies are
looking beyond EVs to meet future transportation needs.
Both
automakers began advanced green-car engineering programs in the
mid-1990s, with Toyota introducing the first-generation Prius hybrid
and Nissan unveiling the battery-powered Altra in late 1997.
Toyota
brought the Prius to the United States in 2000, but it took Nissan
another 10 years to follow the low-volume Altra and other modest
electric-car projects such as the Hypermini with the handsomely
funded 2010 launch of the Leaf.
With
Uchiyamada overseeing continuous refinement of the Prius, Toyota took
a 10-year lead in the green-car derby. Along the way, though, Toyota
effectively subsidized billions of dollars in development,
manufacturing and marketing costs through the first two generations
of the Prius, according to former Toyota executives.
While
it took the Toyota hybrid six years to catch fire with U.S.
consumers, the latest sales data points to the widening chasm between
the two companies' radically different approaches to electrification.
In
the past year, Toyota has broadened its hybrid portfolio to 12
models, including four versions of the Prius, now in its third
generation. Toyota in 2012 sold 327,413 hybrids in the United States
and 1.2 million globally. Worldwide sales of its hybrids now approach
5 million.
The
Prius accounts for more than half of those sales, making it the most
successful green car in history and one of the few exceptions to the
public's yawning indifference to green vehicles and technology.
The
Leaf, on the other hand, has been the rule rather than the exception.
Nissan
unveiled the Leaf two years ago and to date has sold just under
50,000 worldwide. It sold 9,819 last year in the United States, well
under its target of 20,000.
As
part of a year-end sales push, Nissan slapped incentives of almost
$6,000 on the Leaf, and in January slashed the starting price by more
than $6,000, to $29,650. Some Nissan dealers in Los Angeles are
advertising Leaf lease rates as low as $199 a month with $1,999 down,
according to industry research firm TrueCar.
"When
new technologies are launched, sales do not grow as quickly as
everyone expects," said Mitsuhiko Yamashita, Nissan executive
vice president and head of research and development. But "with
EV technologies continuously improving and with prices falling, there
is a possibility that sales could explode."
That
isn't likely to happen anytime soon.
Nissan
may be mildly encouraged that the Leaf is the best-selling pure EV in
the United States. But total EV sales last year were only 14,687,
representing 0.1 percent of total U.S. sales of 14.5 million. In
comparison, hybrid sales in 2012 climbed to 473,083, or roughly 3.3
percent of the market. And of every three hybrids sold last year in
the United States, two were a Toyota or a Lexus.
Fueled
by government subsidies and tax incentives, hybrid sales in Japan
have rocketed to 40 percent of the industry total, with the Prius a
top seller. Hybrids, however, have been far less popular with
consumers in such major markets as Europe and China.
"WE
ARE PRAGMATIC PEOPLE"
The
outlook for pure electric vehicles is even more cloudy.
At
the moment, Ghosn's heady 2009 prediction that electric vehicles
would capture 10 percent of the global market by 2020 — 6 million
battery-powered cars a year or more — doesn't seem remotely within
reach.
Yet
the gradual tightening of global fuel-efficiency standards from 2020
on is forcing automakers to assess their options, including the
application of advanced technology.
Says
Nissan's Yamashita: "It is not possible to meet (future)
regulations unless vehicles are electrified."
The
harsh reality of the market and the public's underwhelming demand for
EVs, however, illuminate Nissan's recent decision to shift more of
its green-tech investment into hybrids.
In
December the company announced it plans to introduce 15 new hybrids
globally by early 2017.
At
the time, Ghosn said, "We are going to continue to heavily
promote electric cars, but at the same time, we are business people,
we are pragmatic people. We will also develop and deliver hybrids
because there are markets and consumers that require hybrids."
Last
September, Toyota publicly walked away from plans to build several
thousand electric cars, scaling back projected volume to a mere 100
battery-powered minicars.
Both
Japanese automakers, meanwhile, have forged new alliances to develop
hydrogen-powered fuel cell cars, Toyota with BMW and, in a deal
announced last week, Nissan with Daimler AG and Ford Motor Co.
In
the meantime, despite massive investments in battery technology and
vehicles, even the most ardent EV adherents seem a bit ambivalent
about the future of battery cars.
"We
don't regret it yet," says Nissan's Yamashita of the company's
multibillion-dollar gamble on EVs. "We might in a few years. No,
we probably won't."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.