Two
Chilling Developments Suggest Asia May Be One Step Away From War
North Korea's third-generation dictator, Kim Jong-un, may choose his father's birthday, February 16, to test a larger or more advanced bomb than the plutonium bombs tested in 2006 and 2009.
Sources close to the family of the new leader, Xi Jinping, say he is moving to firmly grasp control of military and foreign affairs, and changes in direction are not inconceivable.
8
February, 2013
China
and Japan, along with North and South Korean troops at
the DMZ,
appear one step away from armed combat and tensions don't look likely
to ease any time soon.
New
developments within both regions illustrate how close to open combat
the four countries are, and how quickly one incident could expand to
war among very powerful nations.
Tokyo
reported two January events where Chinese
naval vessels targeted its
East China Sea forces with fire-control radar. This specific type of
radar is used almost exclusively to assist guided weapons systems in
their flight toward a target. It's an unmistakable action that can
be the first step to
open combat, and was taken seriously enough by the Japanese captain
to prompt
a combat alert aboard his vessel.
The
Chinese Foreign Ministry responded to
the allegations by saying it hadn't heard about the engagements until
news of the events appeared on international news. It has since said
that the event didn't happen and is a total Japanese fabrication.
Whether it's true or not China
is using Japan's claim to prove Tokyo is preparing for war.
Chinese
special forces aboard warship
If
Chinese ships did engage their fire-control radar, it may be in
Beijing's interest to deny it because either it approved the
maneuver, or the ship's captains acted independently. Both
scenarios offer a long list of concerns that would be easiest for
China to address if avoided entirely.
Japan
continues pressing the issue and yesterday announced that the use of
fire-control radar against its ships is an "act
of force" and a direct UN charter violation."
U.S.
Secretary of Defense Panetta
is pleading for caution and
says, "the situation could ultimately get out of hand." Not
everyone believes fighting is inevitable,
but it's perhaps just as likely as not.
Meanwhile
along the most heavily-fortified and well-armed border in the world,
South Korean troops on the border with the North have received
orders to return fire immediately against DPRK forces.
Pyongyang
three years ago shelled the South and Seoul's response time was
harshly condemned. The new rules of engagement are intended to
prevent the same thing from happening again
Reuters
quotes a South Korean commander stationed
on the border who says: "We will respond immediately to any
enemy provocation." That Captain, along with every South
AP
A
Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) submarine sails past through
Hong Kong's Victoria harbor)
Korean
soldier stationed along the border, operates under this standing
defense ministry order: "punish
automatically ... until the enemy surrenders."
North
Korea failed to surrender in the last war it fought with China
against South Korean and U.S. forces, leaving little reason to
believe it would do so today.
And
as Pyongyang moves forward with its most
recent nuclear test,
there's no reason to think it wouldn't use that technology against
enemy forces long before accepting the notion of defeat.
South Korea in 'first strike' alert over tests
South Korea will pre-emptively strike against North Korea if it shows intent to use a nuclear weapon, a top South Korean general says.
Allies
… a picture of Mao Zedong and North Korea's late leader Kim Il-sung
on the Hekou Bridge linking China and North Korea. Photo:
AP
SMH,
9
February, 2013
The
pledge by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Jung
Seung-jo, to act ''even at the risk of war'' reflects acute concern
in Seoul and Washington that Pyongyang is about to cross the
threshold to possessing a credible nuclear weapons capability.
North
Korea has prepared a bomb for a test that will take place within
weeks or even days, Chinese and Western analysts and diplomats say.
North Korea's third-generation dictator, Kim Jong-un, may choose his father's birthday, February 16, to test a larger or more advanced bomb than the plutonium bombs tested in 2006 and 2009.
South
Korea is the North's usual rhetorical target, but the US has also
been singled out for special treatment.
''We
are not disguising the fact that the various satellites and
long-range rockets that we will fire and the high-level nuclear test
we will carry out are targeted at the United States,'' North Korea's
National Defence Commission said last month, the state news agency
KCNA reported.
The
possibility of a North Korean nuclear warhead reaching as far as Los
Angeles or Darwin is no longer considered fanciful after the North
successfully tested a ballistic missile in December.
The
North may also be close to developing a ''miniaturised'' warhead that
can be fixed to it, analysts and diplomatic sources say.
A
third North Korean nuclear test may place its only ally, China, in a
tighter bind, as the country would then be surrounded on all sides by
nuclear weapons states.
Sources close to the family of the new leader, Xi Jinping, say he is moving to firmly grasp control of military and foreign affairs, and changes in direction are not inconceivable.
But
Chinese regional security analysts seem convinced that Beijing could
not force Pyongyang to give up its nuclear weapons program even if it
tried.
''There
are hardly any circumstances that could divert North Korea from its
path to becoming a nuclear power,'' said Cai Jian, professor of
Korean studies at Shanghai's prestigious Fudan University.
Professor
Cai said the timing of North Korea's nuclear test was uncertain, and
would be designed to extract maximum geopolitical leverage, but it
would happen because it was necessary for refining the weapons
technology.
And
he said China's strategic impetus to shelter North Korea has
sharpened since the Obama administration's ''pivot'' towards Asia.
''As
China grows, the United States adjusts its strategy towards east Asia
to deter and encircle China,'' he said.
''What
China needs is the survival and existence of the North Korean regime
to help China maintain the balance of power in the region,'' he said.
An
article in Wednesday's Global
Times,
a nationalistic Communist Party tabloid, said China should not be
held hostage to North Korean bad behaviour.
''Even
if the whole Korean peninsula becomes more pro-American, it will not
block the rise of China,'' said the editorial. in the paper's Chinese
edition
Professor
Cai said the editorial might signal China would raise the volume of
its protests after a North Korean nuclear test but it would not
affect the basic strategic equation.
Washington
is aware that it lacks bargaining leverage with North Korea or China
so long as military options are off the table, some analysts and
diplomats said.
Talk
of a pre-emptive South Korean, US-backed strike is intended to put
pressure on China to use any leverage it has to restrain the North,
they said.
''If
there is a clear intent that North Korea is about to use a nuclear
weapon, we will eliminate it first even at the risk of a war,'' said
South Korea's General Jung on Wednesday, the Korea
Times reported.
''A
pre-emptive attack against the North trying to use nuclear weapons
does not require consultation with the United States and it is the
right of self-defence,'' he said.
Nevertheless,
a close discussion including a pre-emptive strike option between
South Korea and the US meant sharing comprehensive strategies aimed
at containing North Korea, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.