Propaganda
for the nuclear energy produced on cue
When
is something just a “co-incidence” and when are we just being
paranoid”?
Well,
I am not much of a believer in “coiincidence”
On
February 20, 2019 Margo produced the following video in which she
discusses the following article from Zero Hedge.
The
article makes the point that never has there been less concern about
nuclear weapons and a new generation of mini -nukes shows that on one
side only the fear of mutually-assured destruction (MAD) is over.
One
side is disinterested in mutual anything and fully intend to USE
nuclear weapons
The World’s Most Dangerous Nuclear Weapon Just Rolled Off the Assembly Line
Within one day this article, penned by one Michael Schellingberger appeared in Forbes the very next day, February 21, 2019StopLetting Your Cartoon Fears Of Nuclear Bombs Kill The Planet
It's hard to believe that humankind would kill off our best hope for preventing catastrophic climate change out of an exaggerated fear of nuclear weapons, but that is precisely what we are in the process of doing.
***
Last year, on June 18 Margo did a very comprehensive and excellent report on Novaya Zemlya as a smoking gun for rapid Arctic warming.
On cue, the very next day, the same author produced this article with an almost identical title as the one from the other day.
This came together with a cartoon of a poor, frightened woman.
What could be more ridiculous than fearing nuclear waste?
Forget Chernobyl, forget Fukushima. It's all a complete nothingburger and needed the "save the planet" (for the elite).
Everybody
wants to do something about nuclear waste. Nuclear plant operators
and most House members want to bury it in Nevada. A bipartisan group
of senators wants states to compete for it. And Bill Gates and other
entrepreneurs want to reuse it as fuel in next generation reactors.
Almost everybody is
wrong to do so. Nuclear waste has never been a real problem. In fact,
it’s the best solution to the environmental
impacts from energy production.
Consider:
-
Every year, the lives of seven million people are cut short by waste products in the form of air pollution from burning biomass and fossil fuels;
-
No nation in the world has a serious plan to prevent toxic solar panel and wind turbine waste from entering the global electronic waste stream;
-
No way of making electricity other than nuclear power safely manages and pays for any its waste.
In
other words, nuclear power’s waste by-products aren‘t a mark
against the technology, they are its key selling point.
He
writes about himself:
"I
am a Time Magazine “Hero of the Environment,” Green Book Award
Winner, and President of Environmental Progress, a research and
policy organization. My writings have appeared in The New York Times,
Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, Scientific American, Nature
Energy, and PLOS Biology. My TED talks have been viewed over 1.5
million times"
You
won't see it in print but he is also a sociopathic liar in league
with the nuclear energy.
How much did he sell his soul for?
P.S. Here is Margo's report where she discusses this -
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.