USS Porter to Get Same Treatment as USS Donald Cook as It Enters Black Sea?
Russia:
"Of course, this does not meet with our approval and will
undoubtedly lead to response measures.”
The USS Porter, like the USS Donald Cook, is an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer
Originally
appeared at Zero
Hedge
Having
sent not one but two aircraft carriers into the Mediterranean in
what, as we reported yesterday, was meant to be a "clear
message to Russia",
the US decided to further antagonize Russia when on Monday it sent
the US destroyer
Porter in the Black Sea "for
a series of drills with allies and forces of partner nations in what
the United States called a routine deployment", the US Navy
announced. To be sure, the US Navy was quite clear about its
intentions with these deployments: “It provides some needed
presence in the Med to check…the Russians,” the official said.
“The unpredictability of what we did with Truman kind of makes them
think twice.”
Well,
as we
said yesterday,
"we expect Russia to respond promptly", and sure enough it
did just that when earlier today the Russian Foreign ministry, cited
by Reuters,
said Moscow
would respond to a U.S. naval ship's entry into the Black Sea with
unspecified measures, saying
it and other deployments were designed to ratchet up tensions ahead
of a NATO summit, the RIA news agency reported. And this time, the US
is not covering up behind some fake diplomatic pretext, and freely
admits its intention is to fully antagonize Russia by sending a
heavily armed vessel in what is the Russian equivalent to the Gulf of
Mexico.
Russian
state media reported that the USS Porter, a U.S. naval destroyer,
entered the Black Sea a few days ago on a routine deployment, a move
it said raised hackles in Moscow because it had recently been fitted
with a new missile system. Of course, this is in addition to the two
aircraft carriers already on location in the Mediterranean as the US
is seemingly eager to dramatically escalate tensions with Russia,
this time over sea
"Of
course, this does not meet with our approval and will undoubtedly
lead to response measures," RIA
cited Andrei Kelin, a senior Foreign Ministry official, as saying
about the USS Porter's movements. He also said the deployment of U.S.
aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean was a show of force which in
his view deepened a chill in ties between Moscow and Washington
caused by Russia's actions in Ukraine and Syria."
As
regards the overall situation of course there is a definite increase
and stoking of tensions in our relations," he was quoted as
saying.
“There
is nothing special about the movement of US vessels in this case. We
know that aircraft carriers are moving in the Mediterranean Sea and
elsewhere, they have a right to do so, this is freedom of
navigation,” he said. “But in general, this is a definite
increase in [Russia-US] relations and all this is done ahead of the
NATO summit in Warsaw – this is a demonstration of force,” he
added.
While
we don't know what the "unspecified measure" that Russia
will respond with is just yet, it is certain to provoke further
escalation between the two military superpowers, which as covered
extensively in the recent past, have also escalated in the nuclear
arena to the point where security experts are warning that the "Risk
Of Nuclear Dirty Bomb Is Rising On Poor US-Russia Relations."
Sadly,
it increasingly looks like that just the first great depression ended
in global conflict, war in some capacity is inevitable this time as
well.
Russia
Vows Countermeasures After US Vessel Enters Black Sea
Months
after Russian jets responded to the USS Donald Cook in the Baltic, a
US destroyer is now testing the waters of the Black Sea.
10
June, 2016
On
Monday, the guided-missile destroyer USS Porter entered the Black Sea
to participate in bilateral military exercises as part of Operation
Atlantic Resolve.
"The
United States continues to demonstrate its commitment to the
collective security of our NATO allies and support for our partners
in Europe," reads a statement from the US Navy, adding that the
ship’s operations are meant to "enhance maritime security and
stability, readiness, and naval capability with our allies and
partners."
The
Russian government has criticized the presence of a US warship near
its borders as a provocation and has vowed to take necessary
countermeasures.
"American
warships do enter the Black Sea now and then. Certainly, this does
not meet with [Russia’s] approval and will undoubtedly lead to
planning response measures," said Andrey Kelin, head of the
Russian Foreign Ministry’s European Cooperation Department.
Kelin
also expressed disapproval of the USS Harry S. Truman’s deployment
to the Mediterranean, ahead of NATO’s Warsaw summit in July, a move
he described as an obvious "show of power."
Real
Deal? Nations in Pentagon Wargames Might Have Real World Counterparts
"There
is nothing special about the movement of US vessels in this case. We
know that aircraft carriers are moving the Mediterranean Sea and
elsewhere, they have a right to do so, this is freedom of
navigation," he said.
"But
in general, this is a definite increase in [Russia-US] relations and
all this is done ahead of the NATO summit in Warsaw – this is a
demonstration of force."
The
USS Porter is expected to make port calls while operating in the
Black Sea.
"We
will see how things move forward," Kelin said. "But
overall, we can absolutely not give up on the most important channel
of cooperation and dialogue."
Speaking
with radio Zvezda, military expert Viktor Murakhovsky also condemned
the presence of American warships near Russia’s borders.
US
Air Force Europe Commander Gen. Frank Gorenc said that the US
government’s increase of European Reassurance Initiative funds in
fiscal year 2017 to develop airfields in Eastern Europe will enable
NATO to strengthen its presence there.
"Permanent
deployment of US destroyers in the European theater of war is already
a provocation," he said, noting that there are four other
similar US vessels permanently stationed at a Spanish naval base.
In
April, the USS Donald Cook sailed near Russian waters in the Baltic
Sea, resulting in its interception by a pair of Su-24 bomber jets. US
officials described the jets’ maneuvers as "aggressive,"
as well as "unsafe and unprofessional."
Writing
about the incident for The American Conservative, political
commentator Pat Buchanan observed that "the Russian planes
carried no missiles or bombs." This, he argued, was an
indication that their "message [was]: What are the Americans
doing here?"
"US
warships based in Bahrain confront Iranian subs and missile boats in
the Gulf. Yet in each of these regions it is not US vital interests
that are threatened, but the interests of allies who will not man-up
to their own defense duties, preferring to lay them off on Uncle
Sam," Buchanan said.
"And
America is beginning to buckle under the weight of its global
obligations."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.