Always
nice to get confirmation of what our rulers think of us.
GERMAN PRESIDENT: “THE ELITES ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, THE POPULATIONS ARE THE PROBLEM.”
That's right.
Just cancel the referendum and have another go and see if they get it right this time.
Blair
does not rule out second Brexit vote
Former
UK Prime Minister Tony Blair says that a second Brexit referendum
should not be ruled out in the process of redefining the country’s
relationship with the European Union (EU).
26
June, 2016
Blair
made the comments in an interview with the BBC on Sunday, days after
Thursday’s EU referendum, which saw Britain breaking away from the
bloc by a 52-48 margin.
Asked
whether he would support a new referendum, the former premier said:
“As I’m looking at it here, I can’t see how we could do that.
But the point is: why rule anything out?”
Blair
said that both sides of the debate had to focus their attention on
reestablishing London’s post-Brexit relations with the 28-member
bloc.
“If
there is a desire in the Leave camp to try and bring the country back
together,” he said, “I think we also have to show a maturity in
the politics of Remain and work out how we do this best for the
country.”
Calls
for a second referendum began days ahead of the June 23 vote, when
polls showed little to no margin between both sides.
For
example, a petition demanding the UK government to repeat the vote if
the “Remain” or “Leave” vote was less than 60 percent with a
turnout of less than 75 percent, has been gaining momentum since the
poll, reaching more than three million signatures.
The
online petition generated so much traffic that Parliament's website
temporarily crashed on Saturday.
By
voting to leave the EU, Blair said Britons had “Taken the decision
to swap homes, if you like, without seeing what the other [home]
looks like,” he said.
The
former PM also warned that Europe faces high Euroskepticism levels
across the continent and if many other European countries were to
hold a similar referendum, they might produce similar results.
European
leaders, who had urged the UK to remain in the EU, are now pressing
it to set out a quick timetable for its exit from the bloc, to avoid
a long period of “uncertainty.”
Blair
said Europe had to avoid hasty decisions with regard to the UK as the
two sides were renegotiating mutual ties.
This,I
am sure, is a fairly accurate reflection of the Eurocrats’
position.
I’m
equally sure they are in for a rude awakening.
As
Winston Peters says, this is the end of neoliberalism and close to
the end of the European project.
The
Future of Europe: So What if the British Are Leaving?
A
Commentary by Christoph Schult
26
June, 2016
The
British aren't the only ones who have let their emotions get the
better of reason when considering their frequently fraught
relationship with Europe. Germany has also been overly sentimental
about the meaning of Brexit, with SPIEGEL
pleading "Please
Don't Go" and the sensationalist newspaper Bild even
offering to recognize the contentious 1966 World Cup goal at Wembley
if Britain remained in the EU.
In
an editorial I wrote two weeks ago, I suggested countering all the
hysteria over Brexit by calmly saying to the British: "Then just
go." Many asked whether I was serious. Yes, I was. And no, I am
not opening bottles of champagne because the majority of Britons
decided to turn their backs on the EU.
This
isn't a matter of emotions, but a levelheaded assessment of the
actual implications of Brexit. On balance, the consequences will be
dramatic for Britain. But from the standpoint of the remaining 27 EU
members, Britain's withdrawal offers more opportunities than
drawbacks.
This
applies to the supposed domino effect, of which European politicians
started warning immediately after the UK referendum. Even if
right-wing populists like Dutch politician Geert Wilders and Marine
Le Pen, the head of France's Front National, successfully demanded
their own votes on EU membership, it is unlikely that a majority of
their countrymen would also decide to leave the bloc. The steady
stream of bad news coming from Britain in the coming weeks and months
will see to that.
Warning
Signs
The
fall of the British pound is the first warning sign, and we will soon
hear about major corporations pulling their headquarters out of
London and moving to places like Frankfurt. If the British opt for
the Norwegian model, they will continue to pay billions in
contributions to the EU without having a say in shaping the rules of
the single market. It is doubtful whether this will heighten the
appeal of an exit for other countries. Of course, this presupposes
that EU negotiators take as tough a stance against London as they
have promised.
A
second benefit is that the British can now no longer block
legislation when Europeans decide to join forces in areas where they
are stronger together. The economic union must finally become reality
so that national decisions can no longer jeopardize the common
currency. The euro zone needs a unified economic government and a
European finance minister commanding an independent budget.
DPA British
Prime Minister David Cameron and his wife Samantha following his
resignation announcement on Friday.
The
same applies to foreign and security policy. A permanent, shared
headquarters is needed for increasingly important EU military
missions in places like Mali and the Mediterranean -- something that
all EU countries want, except for the British, who have blocked it.
And when it comes to foreign policy, it is high time that majority
decisions, which have long been customary on issues such as
environmental policy, are allowed. In addition, the refugee crisis
has shown that a real European border control force is needed, as
well as uniform asylum law and a fair distribution of refugees.
Perhaps
Advantageous
Critics
will now object that it isn't just the British who have blocked the
refugee quota. This is true, but if a select group of nations decides
in favor of stronger cooperation, this is both legally possible and
perhaps even advantageous. The euro and the Schengen Area also began
smaller, but both grew as more member states eventually wanted to
join.
"More
Europe," of course, isn't always the best approach. It would
make sense to return some of the powers Brussels now has to the
member states. The common agricultural policy, for example, has for
decades been nothing but a gigantic money redistribution machine
without a discernible added benefit for Europe.
It
is an irony of history that even if the British do not get the deal
Prime Minister David Cameron negotiated with the other EU leaders,
the remaining 27 countries could still implement some of its
provisions. For example, a Romanian worker in Germany, whose children
still live in Romania, should probably not be entitled to generous
German child benefits.
Such
tinkering would certainly help make Europe more attractive again for
many of its citizens. And who knows, perhaps some Britons will soon
regret voting for to leave the union on June 23, 2016.
Translated
from the German by Christopher Sultan
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.