Wikileaks releases over 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair
RT,
7
October, 2016
The
internet whistleblowing group Wikileaks released over 2,000 emails
involving Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The release
comes the same day the State Department published 350 emails
previously deleted from Clinton's private server.
Trends
At
first inspection the emails date as far back as 2008 to 2016 and
cover the gamut from the mundane like "Hillary Clinton’s
Chipotle Order” to “Call with HRC” to “My position on the
Iran deal” sent from Nancy Rotering to John Podesta.
Wikileaks
said Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and served as
Bill Clinton’s chief of staff from 1998 to 2001.
RELEASE: The Podesta Emails #HillaryClinton #Podesta #imWithHer https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/
Podesta
served during Bill Clinton administration. Wikileaks warned on its
10th anniversary it would be releasing more emails.
Podesta statement in response to U.S. government formally naming Russia as responsible for election-related hacks
In
August, the AP revealed that while Donald Trump’s campaign chair
Paul Manafort worked for Ukraine’s former government, he funneled
some $2.2 million in cash to two Washington lobbying firms, including
the Clinton-connected Podesta Group.
Ukraine’s
current government, which goes back to the US-backed February 2014
coup that overthrew President Viktor Yanukovich, has claimed that
Manafort had pocketed more than $12 million as a lobbyist and
consultant for the “pro-Russian regime.”
Between
2012 and 2014, Manafort and his business associate Rick Gates steered
at least $1.13 million in lobbying fees to the Podesta Group Inc. and
another $1.07 million to Mercury LLC, AP reported on Thursday.
When media is programmed to demonize it will not allow facts like this that contradict the narrative http://bit.ly/2biCsnf
@PaulManafort
The
money came from the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, a nonprofit
“governed by a board that initially included parliament members”
from the ruling Party of Regions, according to AP.
The
founder and chairman of the Podesta Group is Tony Podesta – brother
of John Podesta, Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff and current
campaign chairman for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary
Clinton. Mercury is headed by Vin Weber, a former congressman and
adviser to 2012 Republican candidate Mitt Romney.
The
State Department released 250 pages of Clinton’s emails, following
a court order to release 360 pages last month.
Newly
disclosed emails show top Obama administration officials in close
contact with Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2015 about
potential fallout from the former secretary of state’s use of a
private email server.
FBI recovers 30 #Clinton emails possibly linked to Benghazi attack — State Dept. http://on.rt.com/7o04
According
to those email disclosures, the White House was instructing Secretary
of State John Kerry to avoid questions about Clinton’s email
arrangements, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The
emails were obtained by the Republican National Committee as part of
a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking records of Clinton’s
time in office.
Many
of the newly released emails include the sending of news articles
such as “World events test 'No Drama Obama'” on President Obama’s
scheduled trip to Latin America in 2011 critical of his leadership
over questions like the no-fly zone in Libya.
Others
are just notes “Mendez called”, “Cheryl tried you back thru
ops. Think you were trying to reach her a few hours ago,” and “I
am on my way back.”
Among
them is a 2001 discussion paper from Huma Abedin on thoughts on
“post-Gaddafi Assistance & Governance” which talked about how
to form a new Libya government, a new constitution, shore up oil
contracts to revenue, understand past conflicts with the Gaddafi
administration and its alleged failure to share hydrocarbon dollars,
and the theft of private property from members of the monarchy.
RT,
RELEASE: The Podesta Emails #HillaryClinton #Podesta #imWithHer https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/
Podesta statement in response to U.S. government formally naming Russia as responsible for election-related hacks
When media is programmed to demonize it will not allow facts like this that contradict the narrative http://bit.ly/2biCsnf
@PaulManafort
FBI recovers 30 #Clinton emails possibly linked to Benghazi attack — State Dept. http://on.rt.com/7o04
Wikileaks Releases Hillary's Paid Wall Street Speech Transcripts: Hundreds Of "Sensitive" Excerpts
7 October, 2016
While the media is
transfixed with the just released Washington Post leak of a private
Donald Trump conversation from 2005 in
which he was speaking "lewdly" about women, and for which
he has apologized, roughly at the same time, Wikileaks released part
one of what it dubbed the "Podesta
emails",
which it describes as "a series on deals involving Hillary
Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term
associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton's Chief of
Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also owns the Podesta Group
with his brother Tony, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the
Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think
tank."
While the underlying
story in this specific case involves the alleged kickbacks received
by the Clinton Foundation from the Russian government-controlled
"Uranium One", a story which has been profiled previously
by the NYT, and about which Wikileaks adds that "as Russian
interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions
of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and
2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the
Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although
Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly
identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from
the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the
Clintons", what
caught our attention is an email from Tony Carr, a
Research Director at Hillary for America,
in which he lay outs hundreds of excerpts from the heretofore missing
transcripts of Hillary Clinton's infamous Wall Street speeches, with
an emphasis on those which should be flagged as they may be damaging
to Hillary.
But first, here are the
greatest hits as conveniently flagged by the Clinton Campaign itself
on page one of the 80 page addendum dubbed "awkward"
Hillary Clinton: “I'm Kind Of Far Removed” From The Struggles Of The Middle Class “Because The Life I've Lived And The Economic, You Know, Fortunes That My Husband And I Now Enjoy.” “And I am not taking a position on any policy, but I do think there is a growing sense of anxiety and even anger in the country over the feeling that the game is rigged. And I never had that feeling when I was growing up. Never. I mean, were there really rich people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about big business and big government, but we had a solid middle class upbringing. We had good public schools. We had accessible health care. We had our little, you know, one-family house that, you know, he saved up his money, didn't believe in mortgages. So I lived that. And now, obviously, I'm kind of far removed because the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven't forgotten it.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks at Goldman-Black Rock, 2/4/14]
When A Questioner At Goldman Sachs Said She Raised Money For Hillary Clinton In 2008, Hillary Clinton Joked “You Are The Smartest People.” “PARTICIPANT: Secretary, Ann Chow from Houston, Texas. I have had the honor to raise money for you when you were running for president in Texas. MS. CLINTON: You are the smartest people. PARTICIPANT: I think you actually called me on my cell phone, too. I talked to you afterwards.” [ Speech to Goldman Sachs, 2013 IBD Ceo Annual Conference, 6/4/13]
Hillary Clinton Joked That If Lloyd Blankfein Wanted To Run For Office, He Should “Would Leave Goldman Sachs And Start Running A Soup Kitchen Somewhere. “ “MR. BLANKFEIN: I’m saying for myself. MS. CLINTON: If you were going to run here is what I would tell you to do -- MR. BLANKFEIN: Very hypothetical. MS. CLINTON: I think you would leave Goldman Sachs and start running a soup kitchen somewhere. MR. BLANKFEIN: For one thing the stock would go up. MS. CLINTON: Then you could be a legend in your own time both when you were there and when you left.” [ Speech to Goldman Sachs, 2013 IBD Ceo Annual Conference, 6/4/13]
Hillary Clinton Noted President Clinton Had Spoken At The Same Goldman Summit Last Year, And Blankfein Joked “He Increased Our Budget.” “SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first, thanks for having me here and giving me a chance to know a little bit more about the builders and the innovators who you’ve gathered. Some of you might have been here last year, and my husband was, I guess, in this very same position. And he came back and was just thrilled by— MR. BLANKFEIN: He increased our budget. SECRETARY CLINTON: Did he? MR. BLANKFEIN: Yes. That’s why we -- SECRETARY CLINTON: Good. I think he—I think he encouraged you to grow it a little, too. But it really was a tremendous experience for him, so I’ve been looking forward to it and hope we have a chance to talk about a lot of things.” [Goldman Sachs Builders And Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
Clinton Said When She Got To State, Employees “Were Not Mostly Permitted To Have Handheld Devices.” “You know, when Colin Powell showed up as Secretary of State in 2001, most State Department employees still didn't even have computers on their desks. When I got there they were not mostly permitted to have handheld devices. I mean, so you're thinking how do we operate in this new environment dominated by technology, globalizing forces? We have to change, and I can't expect people to change if I don't try to model it and lead it.” [Clinton Speech For General Electric’s Global Leadership Meeting – Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
Clinton Joked It’s “Risky” For Her To Speak To A Group Committed To Futures Markets Given Her Past Whitewater Scandal. “Now, it's always a little bit risky for me to come speak to a group that is committed to the futures markets because -- there's a few knowing laughs -- many years ago, I actually traded in the futures markets. I mean, this was so long ago, it was before computers were invented, I think. And I worked with a group of like-minded friends and associates who traded in pork bellies and cotton and other such things, and I did pretty well. I invested about a thousand dollars and traded up to about a hundred thousand. And then my daughter was born, and I just didn't think I had enough time or mental space to figure out anything having to do with trading other than trading time with my daughter for time with the rest of my life. So I got out, and I thought that would be the end of it.” [Remarks to CME Group, 11/18/13]
Hillary Clinton Said Jordan Was Threatened Because “They Can’t Possibly Vet All Those Refugees So They Don’t Know If, You Know, Jihadists Are Coming In Along With Legitimate Refugees.” “So I think you’re right to have gone to the places that you visited because there’s a discussion going on now across the region to try to see where there might be common ground to deal with the threat posed by extremism and particularly with Syria which has everyone quite worried, Jordan because it’s on their border and they have hundreds of thousands of refugees and they can’t possibly vet all those refugees so they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees. Turkey for the same reason.” [Jewish United Fund Of Metropolitan Chicago Vanguard Luncheon, 10/28/13]
Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open Trade And Open Markets. “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28]
* * *
Here is the full email by
Carrk as of January 25, 2016 laying out all the potentially delicate
issues that the Clinton campaign would wish to avoid from emerging.
One thing to note: as Michael Tracey points out, the Hillary
campaign had all the transcripts at her disposal all along, despite
repeated deflection. Perhaps
as a result of this leak she will now release the full transcripts
for the "proper context."
* * *
From:tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com
To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, slatham@hillaryclinton.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com,creynolds@hillaryclinton.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-01-25 00:28 Subject:
To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, slatham@hillaryclinton.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com,creynolds@hillaryclinton.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-01-25 00:28 Subject:
HRC Paid
Speeches
Team,
Attached are the flags
from HRC’s paid speeches we have from HWA. I put some highlights
below. There is a lot of policy positions that we should give an
extra scrub with Policy.
In terms of what was
opened to the press and what was not, the Washington Examiner got a
hold of one of the private speech contracts (her speeches to
universities were typically open press), so this is worth a
read http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-speeches-are-cozy-for-wall-streeters-but-closed-to-journalists/article/2553294/section/author/dan-friedman
CLINTON
ADMITS SHE IS OUT OF TOUCH
Hillary
Clinton: “I'm Kind Of Far Removed” From The Struggles Of The
Middle Class “Because The Life I've Lived And The Economic, You
Know, Fortunes That My Husband And I Now Enjoy.” “And
I am not taking a position on any policy, but I do think there is a
growing sense of anxiety and even anger in the country over the
feeling that the game is rigged. And I never had that feeling
when I was growing up. Never. I mean, were there really rich
people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about
big business and big government, but we had a solid middle class
upbringing. We had good public schools. We had accessible
health care. We had our little, you know, one-family house
that, you know, he saved up his money, didn't believe in mortgages.
So I lived that. And now, obviously, I'm kind of far removed
because the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that
my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven't forgotten it.”
[Hillary Clinton Remarks at Goldman-Black Rock, 2/4/14]
CLINTON
SAYS YOU NEED TO HAVE A PRIVATE AND PUBLIC POSITION ON POLICY
Clinton: “But
If Everybody's Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions
And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The
Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”
CLINTON:
You just have to sort of figure out how to -- getting back to that
word, "balance" -- how to balance the public and the
private efforts that are necessary to be successful, politically, and
that's not just a comment about today. That, I think, has probably
been true for all of our history, and if you saw the Spielberg movie,
Lincoln, and how he was maneuvering and working to get the 13th
Amendment passed, and he called one of my favorite predecessors,
Secretary Seward, who had been the governor and senator from New
York, ran against Lincoln for president, and he told Seward, I need
your help to get this done. And Seward called some of his lobbyist
friends who knew how to make a deal, and they just kept going at it.
I mean, politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it
always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be.
But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room
discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little
nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private
position. And finally, I think -- I believe in evidence-based
decision making. I want to know what the facts are. I mean, it's like
when you guys go into some kind of a deal, you know, are you going to
do that development or not, are you going to do that renovation or
not, you know, you look at the numbers. You try to figure out what's
going to work and what's not going to work. [Clinton Speech For
National Multi-Housing Council, 4/24/13]
CLINTON
TALKS ABOUT HOLDING WALL STREET ACCOUNTABLE ONLY FOR POLITICAL
REASONS
Clinton Said
That The Blame Placed On The United States Banking System For The
Crisis “Could Have Been Avoided In Terms Of Both Misunderstanding
And Really Politicizing What Happened.” “That
was one of the reasons that I started traveling in February of '09,
so people could, you know, literally yell at me for the United States
and our banking system causing this everywhere. Now, that's an
oversimplification we know, but it was the conventional wisdom. And I
think that there's a lot that could have been avoided in terms of
both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened with
greater transparency, with greater openness on all sides, you know,
what happened, how did it happen, how do we prevent it from
happening? You guys help us figure it out and let's make sure
that we do it right this time. And I think that everybody was
desperately trying to fend off the worst effects institutionally,
governmentally, and there just wasn't that opportunity to try to sort
this out, and that came later.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative
Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
* * *
Clinton: “Even
If It May Not Be 100 Percent True, If The Perception Is That Somehow
The Game Is Rigged, That Should Be A Problem For All Of Us.” “Now,
it's important to recognize the vital role that the financial markets
play in our economy and that so many of you are contributing to.
To function effectively those markets and the men and women who shape
them have to command trust and confidence, because we all rely on the
market's transparency and integrity. So even if it may not be 100
percent true, if the perception is that somehow the game is rigged,
that should be a problem for all of us, and we have to be willing to
make that absolutely clear. And if there are issues, if there's
wrongdoing, people have to be held accountable and we have to try to
deter future bad behavior, because the public trust is at the core of
both a free market economy and a democracy.” [Clinton Remarks to
Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14]
CLINTON
SUGGESTS WALL STREET INSIDERS ARE WHAT IS NEEDED TO FIX WALL STREET
Clinton Said
Financial Reform “Really Has To Come From The Industry
Itself.” “Remember
what Teddy Roosevelt did. Yes, he took on what he saw as the
excesses in the economy, but he also stood against the excesses in
politics. He didn't want to unleash a lot of nationalist,
populistic reaction. He wanted to try to figure out how to get
back into that balance that has served America so well over our
entire nationhood. Today, there's more that can and should be done
that really has to come from the industry itself, and how we can
strengthen our economy, create more jobs at a time where that's
increasingly challenging, to get back to Teddy Roosevelt's square
deal. And I really believe that our country and all of you are
up to that job.” [Clinton Remarks to Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14]
* * *
Speaking About
The Importance Of Proper Regulation, Clinton Said “The People That
Know The Industry Better Than Anybody Are The People Who Work In The
Industry.” “I
mean, it's still happening, as you know. People are looking
back and trying to, you know, get compensation for bad mortgages and
all the rest of it in some of the agreements that are being reached.
There's nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little
is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out
what works? And the people that know the industry better than
anybody are the people who work in the industry. And I think there
has to be a recognition that, you know, there's so much at stake now,
I mean, the business has changed so much and decisions are made so
quickly, in nano seconds basically. We spend trillions of
dollars to travel around the world, but it's in everybody's interest
that we have a better framework, and not just for the United States
but for the entire world, in which to operate and trade.” [Goldman
Sachs AIMS Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
CLINTON
ADMITS NEEDING WALL STREET FUNDING
Clinton Said
That Because Candidates Needed Money From Wall Street To Run For
Office, People In New York Needed To Ask Tough Questions About The
Economy Before Handing Over Campaign Contributions. “Secondly,
running for office in our country takes a lot of money, and
candidates have to go out and raise it. New York is probably
the leading site for contributions for fundraising for candidates on
both sides of the aisle, and it's also our economic center. And there
are a lot of people here who should ask some tough questions before
handing over campaign contributions to people who were really playing
chicken with our whole economy.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative
Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
* * *
Clinton: “It
Would Be Very Difficult To Run For President Without Raising A Huge
Amount Of Money And Without Having Other People Supporting You
Because Your Opponent Will Have Their Supporters.” “So
our system is, in many ways, more difficult, certainly far more
expensive and much longer than a parliamentary system, and I really
admire the people who subject themselves to it. Even when I,
you know, think they should not be elected president, I still think,
well, you know, good for you I guess, you're out there promoting
democracy and those crazy ideas of yours. So I think that it's
something -- I would like -- you know, obviously as somebody who has
been through it, I would like it not to last as long because I think
it's very distracting from what we should be doing every day in our
public business. I would like it not to be so expensive.
I have no idea how you do that. I mean, in my campaign -- I lose
track, but I think I raised $250 million or some such enormous
amount, and in the last campaign President Obama raised 1.1 billion,
and that was before the Super PACs and all of this other money just
rushing in, and it's so ridiculous that we have this kind of free for
all with all of this financial interest at stake, but, you know, the
Supreme Court said that's basically what we're in for. So we're
kind of in the wild west, and, you know, it would be very difficult
to run for president without raising a huge amount of money and
without having other people supporting you because your opponent will
have their supporters. So I think as hard as it was when I ran,
I think it's even harder now.” [Clinton Speech For General
Electric’s Global Leadership Meeting – Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
CLINTON
TOUTS HER RELATIONSHIP TO WALL STREET AS A SENATOR
Clinton: As
Senator, “I Represented And Worked With” So Many On Wall Street
And “Did All I Could To Make Sure They Continued To Prosper” But
Still Called For Closing Carried Interest Loophole. In
remarks at Robbins, Gellar, Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, Hillary
Clinton said, “When I was a Senator from New York, I represented
and worked with so many talented principled people who made their
living in finance. But even thought I represented them and did
all I could to make sure they continued to prosper, I called for
closing the carried interest loophole and addressing skyrocketing CEO
pay. I also was calling in '06, '07 for doing something about the
mortgage crisis, because I saw every day from Wall Street literally
to main streets across New York how a well-functioning financial
system is essential. So when I raised early warnings about early
warnings about subprime mortgages and called for regulating
derivatives and over complex financial products, I didn't get some
big arguments, because people sort of said, no, that makes sense.
But boy, have we had fights about it ever since.” [Hillary
Clinton’s Remarks at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in San Diego,
9/04/14]
* * *
Clinton On
Wall Street: “I Had Great Relations And Worked So Close Together
After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown, And A Lot Of Respect For The Work You
Do And The People Who Do It.” “Now,
without going over how we got to where we are right now, what would
be your advice to the Wall Street community and the big banks as to
the way forward with those two important decisions? SECRETARY
CLINTON: Well, I represented all of you for eight years.
I had great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to
rebuild downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the
people who do it, but I do -- I think that when we talk about the
regulators and the politicians, the economic consequences of bad
decisions back in '08, you know, were devastating, and they had
repercussions throughout the world.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS
Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
CLINTON
TALKS ABOUT THE CHALLENGES RUNNING FOR OFFICE
Hillary
Clinton Said There Was “A Bias Against People Who Have Led
Successful And/Or Complicated Lives,” Citing The Need To Divese Of
Assets, Positions, And Stocks. “SECRETARY
CLINTON: Yeah. Well, you know what Bob Rubin said about
that. He said, you know, when he came to Washington, he had a
fortune. And when he left Washington, he had a small
--
MR. BLANKFEIN: That’s how you have a small fortune, is you go
to Washington. SECRETARY CLINTON: You go to Washington.
Right.
But, you know, part of the problem with the political situation, too,
is that there is such a bias against people who have led successful
and/or complicated lives. You know, the divestment of assets,
the stripping of all kinds of positions, the sale of stocks. It
just becomes very onerous and unnecessary.” [Goldman Sachs Builders
And Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
CLINTON
SUGGESTS SHE IS A MODERATE
Clinton Said
That Both The Democratic And Republican Parties Should Be
“Moderate.” “URSULA
BURNS: Interesting. Democrats? SECRETARY CLINTON:
Oh, long, definitely. URSULA BURNS: Republicans? SECRETARY
CLINTON: Unfortunately, at the time, short. URSULA BURNS:
Okay. We'll go back to questions. SECRETARY CLINTON: We
need two parties. URSULA BURNS: Yeah, we do need two parties.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Two sensible, moderate, pragmatic parties.”
[Hillary Clinton Remarks, Remarks at Xerox, 3/18/14]
* * *
Clinton:
“Simpson-Bowles… Put Forth The Right Framework. Namely, We Have
To Restrain Spending, We Have To Have Adequate Revenues, And We Have
To Incentivize Growth. It's A Three-Part Formula… And They Reached
An Agreement. But What Is Very Hard To Do Is To Then Take That
Agreement If You Don't Believe That You're Going To Be Able To Move
The Other Side.” SECRETARY
CLINTON: Well, this may be borne more out of hope than
experience in the last few years. But Simpson-Bowles -- and I know
you heard from Erskine earlier today -- put forth the right
framework. Namely, we have to restrain spending, we have to have
adequate revenues, and we have to incentivize growth. It's a
three-part formula. The specifics can be negotiated depending
upon whether we're acting in good faith or not. And what Senator
Simpson and Erskine did was to bring Republicans and Democrats alike
to the table, and you had the full range of ideological views from I
think Tom Coburn to Dick Durbin. And they reached an agreement.
But what is very hard to do is to then take that agreement if you
don't believe that you're going to be able to move the other side.
And where we are now is in this gridlocked dysfunction. So you've got
Democrats saying that, you know, you have to have more revenues;
that's the sine qua non of any kind of agreement. You have
Republicans saying no, no, no on revenues; you have to cut much more
deeply into spending. Well, looks what's happened. We are
slowly returning to growth. It's not as much or as fast as many
of us would like to see, but, you know, we're certainly better off
than our European friends, and we're beginning to, I believe, kind of
come out of the long aftermath of the '08 crisis. [Clinton Speech For
Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
* * *
Clinton: “The
Simpson-Bowles Framework And The Big Elements Of It Were Right… You
Have To Restrain Spending, You Have To Have Adequate Revenues, And
You Have To Have Growth.”
CLINTON:
So, you know, the Simpson-Bowles framework and the big elements of it
were right. The specifics can be negotiated and argued over.
But you got to do all three. You have to restrain spending, you
have to have adequate revenues, and you have to have growth.
And I think we are smart enough to figure out how to do that.
[Clinton Speech For Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
CLINTON IS
AWARE OF SECURITY CONCERNS AROUND BLACKBERRIES
Clinton: “At
The State Department We Were Attacked Every Hour, More Than Once An
Hour By Incoming Efforts To Penetrate Everything We Had. And
That Was True Across The U.S. Government.”
CLINTON:
But, at the State Department we were attacked every hour, more than
once an hour by incoming efforts to penetrate everything we had.
And that was true across the U.S. government. And we knew it
was going on when I would go to China, or I would go to Russia, we
would leave all of our electronic equipment on the plane, with the
batteries out, because this is a new frontier. And they're
trying to find out not just about what we do in our government.
They're trying to find out about what a lot of companies do and they
were going after the personal emails of people who worked in the
State Department. So it's not like the only government in the world
that is doing anything is the United States. But, the United
States compared to a number of our competitors is the only government
in the world with any kind of safeguards, any kind of checks and
balances. They may in many respects need to be strengthened and
people need to be reassured, and they need to have their protections
embodied in law. But, I think turning over a lot of that
material intentionally or unintentionally, because of the way it can
be drained, gave all kinds of information not only to big countries,
but to networks and terrorist groups, and the like. So I have a hard
time thinking that somebody who is a champion of privacy and liberty
has taken refuge in Russia under Putin's authority. And then he
calls into a Putin talk show and says, President Putin, do you spy on
people? And President Putin says, well, from one intelligence
professional to another, of course not. Oh, thank you so much.
I mean, really, I don't know. I have a hard time following it.
[Clinton Speech At UConn, 4/23/14]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton: “When I Got To The State Department, It Was Still Against
The Rules To Let Most -- Or Let All Foreign Service Officers Have
Access To A Blackberry.”
“I
mean, let's face it, our government is woefully, woefully behind in
all of its policies that affect the use of technology. When I
got to the State Department, it was still against the rules to let
most -- or let all Foreign Service Officers have access to a
Blackberry. You couldn't have desktop computers when Colin
Powell was there. Everything that you are taking advantage of,
inventing and using, is still a generation or two behind when it
comes to our government.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks at Nexenta,
8/28/14]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton: “We Couldn't Take Our Computers, We Couldn't Take Our
Personal Devices” Off The Plane In China And Russia. “I
mean, probably the most frustrating part of this whole debate are
countries acting like we're the only people in the world trying to
figure out what's going on. I mean, every time I went to
countries like China or Russia, I mean, we couldn't take our
computers, we couldn't take our personal devices, we couldn't take
anything off the plane because they're so good, they would penetrate
them in a minute, less, a nanosecond. So we would take the
batteries out, we'd leave them on the plane.” [Hillary Clinton
Remarks at Nexenta, 8/28/14]
* * *
Clinton Said
When She Got To State, Employees “Were Not Mostly Permitted To Have
Handheld Devices.”
“You
know, when Colin Powell showed up as Secretary of State in 2001, most
State Department employees still didn't even have computers on their
desks. When I got there they were not mostly permitted to have
handheld devices. I mean, so you're thinking how do we operate
in this new environment dominated by technology, globalizing forces?
We have to change, and I can't expect people to change if I don't try
to model it and lead it.” [Clinton Speech For General Electric’s
Global Leadership Meeting – Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton Said You Know You Can’t Bring Your Phone And Computer When
Traveling To China And Russia And She Had To Take Her Batteries Out
And Put them In A Special Box.
“And
anybody who has ever traveled in other countries, some of which shall
remain nameless, except for Russia and China, you know that you can’t
bring your phones and your computers. And if you do, good
luck. I mean, we would not only take the batteries out, we
would leave the batteries and the devices on the plane in special
boxes. Now, we didn’t do that because we thought it would be
fun to tell somebody about. We did it because we knew that we
were all targets and that we would be totally vulnerable. So it’s
not only what others do to us and what we do to them and how many
people are involved in it. It’s what’s the purpose of it,
what is being collected, and how can it be used. And there are
clearly people in this room who know a lot about this, and some of
you could be very useful contributors to that conversation because
you’re sophisticated enough to know that it’s not just, do it,
don’t do it. We have to have a way of doing it, and then we
have to have a way of analyzing it, and then we have to have a way of
sharing it.” [Goldman Sachs Builders And Innovators Summit,
10/29/13]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton Lamented How Far Behind The State Department Was In
Technology, Saying “People Were Not Even Allowed To Use Mobile
Devices Because Of Security Issues.”
“Personally,
having, you know, lived and worked in the White House, having been a
senator, having been Secretary of State, there has traditionally been
a great pool of very talented, hard-working people. And just as
I was saying about the credit market, our personnel policies haven’t
kept up with the changes necessary in government. We have a lot
of difficulties in getting—when I got to the State Department, we
were so far behind in technology, it was embarrassing. And, you
know, people were not even allowed to use mobile devices because of
security issues and cost issues, and we really had to try to push
into the last part of the 20th Century in order to get people
functioning in 2009 and ‘10.” [Goldman Sachs Builders And
Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
CLINTON
REMARKS ARE PRO KEYSTONE AND PRO TRADE
Clinton: “So
I Think That Keystone Is A Contentious Issue, And Of Course It Is
Important On Both Sides Of The Border For Different And Sometimes
Opposing Reasons…”
“So
I think that Keystone is a contentious issue, and of course it is
important on both sides of the border for different and sometimes
opposing reasons, but that is not our relationship. And I think
our relationship will get deeper and stronger and put us in a
position to really be global leaders in energy and climate change if
we worked more closely together. And that's what I would like
to see us do.” [Remarks at tinePublic, 6/18/14]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open
Trade And Open Markets. “My
dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open
borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and
sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for
every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco
Itau.doc, p. 28]
* * *
Hillary
Clinton Said We Have To Have A Concerted Plan To Increase Trade; We
Have To Resist Protectionism And Other Kinds Of Barriers To
Trade.
“Secondly,
I think we have to have a concerted plan to increase trade already
under the current circumstances, you know, that Inter-American
Development Bank figure is pretty surprising. There is so much more
we can do, there is a lot of low hanging fruit but businesses on both
sides have to make it a priority and it's not for governments
to do but governments can either make it easy or make it hard and we
have to resist, protectionism, other kinds of barriers to market
access and to trade and I would like to see this get much more
attention and be not just a policy for a year under president X or
president Y but a consistent one.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco
Itau.doc, p. 32]
CLINTON IS
MORE FAVORABLE TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE AND SINGLE PAYER
Clinton Said
Single-Payer Health Care Systems “Can Get Costs Down,” And “Is
As Good Or Better On Primary Care,” But “They Do Impose Things
Like Waiting Times.”
“If
you look at countries that are comparable, like Switzerland or
Germany, for example, they have mixed systems. They don't have
just a single-payer system, but they have very clear controls over
budgeting and accountability. If you look at the single-payer
systems, like Scandinavia, Canada, and elsewhere, they can get costs
down because, you know, although their care, according to statistics,
overall is as good or better on primary care, in particular, they do
impose things like waiting times, you know. It takes longer to
get like a hip replacement than it might take here.” [Hillary
Clinton remarks to ECGR Grand Rapids, 6/17/13]
* * *
Clinton Cited
President Johnson’s Success In Establishing Medicare And Medicaid
And Said She Wanted To See The U.S. Have Universal Health Care Like
In Canada.
“You
know, on healthcare we are the prisoner of our past. The way we
got to develop any kind of medical insurance program was during World
War II when companies facing shortages of workers began to offer
healthcare benefits as an inducement for employment. So from
the early 1940s healthcare was seen as a privilege connected to
employment. And after the war when soldiers came back and went
back into the market there was a lot of competition, because the
economy was so heated up. So that model continued. And then of
course our large labor unions bargained for healthcare with the
employers that their members worked for. So from the early
1940s until the early 1960s we did not have any Medicare, or our
program for the poor called Medicaid until President Johnson was able
to get both passed in 1965. So the employer model continued as the
primary means by which working people got health insurance.
People over 65 were eligible for Medicare. Medicaid, which was
a partnership, a funding partnership between the federal government
and state governments, provided some, but by no means all poor people
with access to healthcare. So what we've been struggling with
certainly Harry Truman, then Johnson was successful on Medicare and
Medicaid, but didn't touch the employer based system, then actually
Richard Nixon made a proposal that didn't go anywhere, but was quite
far reaching. Then with my husband's administration we worked
very hard to come up with a system, but we were very much constricted
by the political realities that if you had your insurance from your
employer you were reluctant to try anything else. And so we
were trying to build a universal system around the employer-based
system. And indeed now with President Obama's legislative success in
getting the Affordable Care Act passed that is what we've done.
We still have primarily an employer-based system, but we now have
people able to get subsidized insurance. So we have health
insurance companies playing a major role in the provision of
healthcare, both to the employed whose employers provide health
insurance, and to those who are working but on their own are not able
to afford it and their employers either don't provide it, or don't
provide it at an affordable price. We are still struggling.
We've made a lot of progress. Ten million Americans now have
insurance who didn't have it before the Affordable Care Act, and that
is a great step forward. (Applause.) And what we're going to
have to continue to do is monitor what the costs are and watch
closely to see whether employers drop more people from insurance so
that they go into what we call the health exchange system. So
we're really just at the beginning. But we do have Medicare for
people over 65. And you couldn't, I don't think, take it away
if you tried, because people are very satisfied with it, but we also
have a lot of political and financial resistance to expanding that
system to more people. So we're in a learning period as we move
forward with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. And
I'm hoping that whatever the shortfalls or the glitches have been,
which in a big piece of legislation you're going to have, those will
be remedied and we can really take a hard look at what's succeeding,
fix what isn't, and keep moving forward to get to affordable
universal healthcare coverage like you have here in Canada.
[Clinton Speech For tinePublic – Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15]
* * *
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.