Just in from
Wikileaks...
WIKILEAKS' BOARD
STATEMENT ON JULIAN ASSANGE< ECUADOR AND THE U.S. ELECTION
Just got this tweet from
Wikileaks. It's dated Oct 24 because of the London time zone.
For those of you who may
have been concerned about Assange's fate, you can see now that he is
well enough. And that the US government (Obama administration) still
regards him as a big thorn in their sides.
By putting pressure on
Ecuador to cut him off the internet, the US (John Kerry) has
virtually confirmed that Assange is not only well, but that
Washington is afraid of what Wikileaks might release about Hillary
between now and Nov 7.
Wikileaks Provides Status Update On Julian Assange And The US Election
ZeroHedge,
24
October, 2016
Over
the past week concerns mounted that in the aftermath of the
surprising decision by Ecuador to cut Julian Assange's internet
connection during the US election period (under pressure from John
Kerry), that not all might be well with the Wikileaks founder, about
whom Hillary Clinton allegedly jokingly asked whether he can be
droned. Concerned speculation about the Ecuadorian embassy exile had
risen to such an degree, that overnight Wikileaks announced it would
provide a state update on Assange's current status. It did so moments
ago on twitter when the WikiLeaks Editorial Board issued the
following statement on the status of Julian Assange, Ecuador and the
US election.
The
contents of the statement:
On
Tuesday, the government of Ecuador issued a statement saying that it
had decided to not permit Mr. Assange to use the government of
Ecuador's internet connection during the US election citing its
policy of "non interference."
Ecuador's
statement also clarified that it does not seek to interfere with
WikiLeaks journalistic work and that it would continue to protect Mr.
Assange's asylum rights.
Mr.
Assange has asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where the
United Nations has ruled he has been unlawfully deprived of liberty
by the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Sweden for the last six
years. He has not been charged.
It
is the government of Ecuador's prerogative to decide how to best
guard against the misinterpretation of its policies by media groups
or states whilst ensuring that it protects Mr. Assange's human
rights.
WikiLeaks
is a global, high volume publisher that publishes on average one
million documents and associated analyses a year.
WikiLeaks
publishes its journalistic work from large data centers based in
France, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway, among others. Most
WikiLeaks staff and lawyers reside in the EU or the US and have not
been disrupted.
WikiLeaks
has never published from jurisdiction of Ecuador and has no plans to
do so. Similarly Mr. Assange does not transmit US election related
documents from the embassy.
WikiLeaks
is entirely funded by its readers, book and film sales. Its
publications ar
WikiLeaks
has a perfect, decade long record for publishing only true documents.
It has many thousands of sources but does not engage in
collaborations with states.
Mr.
Assange has not endorsed any candidate although he was happy to speak
at the Green's convention due to Dr. Jill Stein's position
whistleblowers, peace and war.
Reading
between the lines, it appears that Assange is fine, if only for the
time being.
Director Of Wikileaks Found Dead
Hillary’s Body Count Is Going Up: Wikileaks Director & Assange’s Mentor Gavin MacFadyen Found Dead
New
casualty of cruel ambition to be US president, the Clinton body count
is going up.
Director
of WikiLeaks, her biggest enemy besides Trump, is found dead today!
According
to RT:
WikiLeaks
director and founder of the Centre for Investigative Journalism Gavin
MacFadyen has died at age 76. The cause of death is yet unknown. His
‘fellows in arms’ have flocked online to post their farewells,
including WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.
“We
are extremely sad to announce the death of Gavin MacFadyen, CIJ’s
Founder, Director and its leading light,” the Centre for
Investigative Journalism team wrote on its Twitter.
MacFadyen was a pioneering investigative journalist and filmmaker, who back in 2003 founded the Centre for Investigative Journalism (CIJ), an organization that helped break several major stories and has trained a number of prominent journalists. He was a mentor and friend to famous whistleblower and co-founder of WikiLeaks Julian Assange, as well as the director of the publication. Paying tribute to their head, WikiLeaks published a post on the group’s Twitter account saying MacFadyen “now takes his fists and his fight to battle God.” (USAPOLITICSTODAY)
Where
is Julian Assange? We are all seriously concerned now
Kristine Moore
24
October, 2016
Rumors
about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange are swirling around the internet
so fast right now that it seems like each time I run a Google search
to see if there is any news, several new theories have sprung up
already. But this is a good thing. It shows those in control that the
rest of us aren’t going to simply sit back, fret, and do nothing.
We are going to make sure that Julian is okay. Whatever it takes.
Before Assange, people could be forgiven for thinking that trapping someone inside a small space in London and holding them hostage as a political prisoner was something that only happened during the medieval era. After all, the Tower of London has seen many political prisoners in its time, most of them put there for dubious reasons at best. And now, in the year 2016, we have Julian Assange holed up inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Utterly trapped and unable to even get fresh air or step outside for a walk for fear of arrest. And he has been there since 2012.
What
of this possible arrest, you ask? For anybody that has read even in
passing that there are rape charges that were filed against Julian,
let me just put this to rest right now, once and for all. Julian
Assange did not rape anybody.
What
he did do was have consensual sex with two women without using
protection. In Sweden, if a woman goes to the police and says a man
didn’t use protection, they can arrest you on the spot. No proof
whatsoever is needed. In this particular case, the women in question
both found out that he had been with the other one and sought
revenge. Don’t people think it’s odd that the charges were
immediately dropped, only to be reinstated again?
A
protester outside of the Ecuadorian Embassy where Julian Assange is
trapped. [Image by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images]
If
you have been paying attention to WikiLeaks long enough, you will
know that the United States would dearly love to bring Julian Assange
onto American soil so that they can prosecute him for treason,
something that could result in the death penalty. If Julian so much
as steps outside of the Ecuadorian Embassy, there are British guards
stationed outside that will whisk him away to Sweden. From there, the
Swedish authorities would almost certainly give him up to the
American authorities.
So,
for anybody who asks why Julian Assange doesn’t just face the
Swedish rape allegations if he knows he is innocent, this is why.
It’s all a game. And it’s a game that Sweden and the United
States have rigged in their favor to win. But that really shouldn’t
surprise anybody.
We’ve
all heard by now that Mark
Halperin from
The Circus has claimed that Julian Assange could be “very easily
extradited” if Hillary Clinton wins the upcoming election. And you
know what? He’s probably right. But when Assange’s WikiLeaks
supporters took down most of the internet on the East Coast and West
Coast recently, this was a warning shot to politicians. If political
leaders are worried about leaked e-mails and data now, they need to
get their heads around the fact that if Julian gets extradited to
Sweden and then the United States, or tortured and murdered, it’s
game over as far as they are concerned. Is this something they really
want to risk because of their pride and ambitions?
Speaking
of politicians, WikiLeaks is reporting that it was U.S. Secretary of
State John
Kerry who
demanded that Ecuador cut all internet access for Assange. Ecuador
has obviously bowed to American authority and pressure, and this lack
of Julian online is what is so concerning to everybody right now.
WikiLeaks
posted on their Twitter feed yesterday that it wasn’t unreasonable
that supporters were demanding proof that Julian Assange is still
alive, and for that very reason they are giving a survey asking
participants what would be the most effective and believable way to
show that Assange is not singing with the choir invisible.
Thousands keep demanding Assange proof of life. Not unreasonable. He's in a tough spot and is WikiLeaks best known validator. Preference?
When
I took the poll last night, I chose a video speech, which was ranked
highest at that point, but I noticed that having Assange stand at his
window was in a very close second place.
How
do you feel about this whole situation? Is it right that governments
are holding a man hostage who is so committed to truth and justice?
What do you think the best method of proof would be to show us that
Julian Assange is still alive and well?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.