Oregon
standoff: All defendants found not guilty
27
October, 2016
Update
at 4:10 p.m.: All
defendants found not guilty.
Update: The
jury reported to the court Thursday afternoon that it has
reached consensus on all but one charge. The jury sent a note to the
judge that members have "exhausted all discussion" and
can't come to an agreement, and that "further deliberation would
not help."
Deliberations
started anew Thursday morning after the federal judge in the
conspiracy trial against Ammon Bundy and six co-defendants welcomed a
new juror and told the reconstructed 12-member jury to
"disregard entirely'' past discussions and begin fresh.
"Starting
over may seem frustrating,'' U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown told
the jurors in court. "Do not let it discourage you.''
Brown
directed the jurors not to speculate or discuss the reasons why
they'd been reconfigured, with Juror 11 replaced by Juror 18. The
judge dismissed Juror 11 on Wednesday, a day after a fellow juror
questioned his impartiality in a note to the court, submitted on the
third day of deliberations
"That's
happened. That's passed,'' Brown said.
She
urged the group to start all over, "as if the previous
deliberations have never occurred.''
The
judge also reminded the group that unanimous rulings are required for
a verdict, as to each count in the case.
Ammon
Bundy and six-co-defendants are charged with conspiring to impede
federal employees at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge through
intimidation, threat or force stemming from the 41-day occupation of
the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Four of the seven defendants
are charged with possessing guns in a federal facility. Two of the
defendants each face an additional charge of theft of government
property.
After
the judge's five-minute instructions, the jury was released by 8:40
a.m. to start deliberations again.
The
jury is expected to deliberate an hour past it's usual end time,
until 5:30 Thursday. The jury won't meet on Friday. If the jury is
not done Thursday, deliberations will continue on Monday.
Brown
questioned if Juror 18, a legal assistant for a state public defender
who was summoned from Central Oregon Wednesday afternoon, had any
exposure to information about the case since she was temporarily
dismissed last week after closing arguments and lengthy jury
instructions were heard. She shook her head no.
Juror
1, who was the past presiding juror, asked if the newly-reconstructed
jury picks a new person to serve in that role.
"Yes,
because your prior deliberations don't count,'' the judge told him.
The
judge didn't hear any arguments in court about a motion filed by
Ammon Bundy's lawyers, seeking a change in the jury instruction about
the Second Amendment. His lawyers had asked the instruction include a
reference to a militia. Judge Brown said she found no basis to change
the instructions.
In
fact, the judge didn't repeat the lengthy jury instructions Thursday,
since the alternate juror, now a full-fledged member of the jury, had
been present for that delivery last week.
Ammon
Bundy's lawyer, Marcus Mumford, said he's pleased that Juror 11 was
dismissed, after a fellow juror had questioned if he could be
impartial. Juror 4 had reported to the court that Juror 11, a former
Bureau of Land Management employee, had stated at the start of
the last deliberations, "I am very biased...''
"I'm
still racked with self doubt about all sorts of things here, but
that's sort of the nature of this business,'' Mumford said.
His
client, who chose to wore jail scrubs throughout the trial, appeared
in court before the newly-reconstructed jury on Thursday in a gray
suit. Mumford said he wasn't sure why, but said he believes Ammon
Bundy wants to be dressed in a suit for the eventual reading of the
verdicts.
--
Maxine Bernstein
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.