Cancer
risk linked to radiation levels in fish species after Fukushima
2
October, 2013
TWO-AND-A-HALF
YEARS AFTER Fukushima, many fish species still have highly elevated
amounts of radioactive cesium from the stricken plant, including
species that Japan exports to Canada, according to the Japanese
Fisheries Agency’s tests on fish catches.
And
Japanese fish and seafood exports to Canada have grown significantly
since Fukushima, with $24 million in exports in 2012, up 20 percent
from $20 million in 2010, according to Statistics Canada data.
In
July this year, a sea bass caught in Japan had 1,000 becquerels per
kilogram of radioactive cesium—10 times Japan’s ceiling of 100
becquerels per kilo in food. It was the second-highest amount found
in a sea bass since the disaster occurred.
And
in February, a greenling in the harbour of the Fukushima plant had a
record 740,000 becquerels per kilo of cesium—7,400 times Japan’s
ceiling. Two in five fish tested in July had detectable levels of
cesium 134 or cesium 137, radioactive isotopes released from
Fukushima.
On
average, fish in the 33,000 tests since March 2011 had 18 becquerels
per kilo of cesium. In March and April 2011, fish also had 65
becquerels per kilo of iodine 131. (The Straight didn’t count in
these averages any fish caught in Fukushima prefecture, where most
species are banned from the market.)
Fish
caught far out in the Pacific had an average of two becquerels of
cesium per kilo.
The
Straight used these levels to determine how much radiation the public
has been exposed to in Japan and elsewhere, based on fishery data
from the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization.
The
average radiation levels are below Japan’s ceiling and Health
Canada’s much higher ceiling of 1,000 becquerels per kilo for
cesium and iodine 131.
But
the radiation detected can still cause cancer, according to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s cancer-risk formula, a leading
international standard for forecasting cancer risks from radiation.
The
What’s
more, the EPA formula underestimates cancer impacts because it
doesn’t fully include all research on radiation impacts, in the
estimate of Daniel Hirsch, a UC Santa Cruz nuclear expert.
(Also
according to Hirsch, Health Canada uses a less accepted cancer-risk
formula that underestimates the dangers even more.)
Hirsch
helped preside over a study of nuclear-power workers in the 1990s
that found cancer rates at least six to eight times higher than
predicted by official formulas.
Important!
Canadian Fukushima Radiation Updates
By
Susan Duclos
24
October, 2013
California
is pleading
for acknowledgment about the radiation hammering the West Coast from
the massive pouring of radioactive water into the Pacific and the
radiation leak at the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant from the 2011
earthquake and tsuani.
Alaska
is concerned
about one of their most valuable resources, Salmon.
The
video below is from yet another geographical area, Canada updates on
the Fukushima radiation damage, with a synopsis.
Maybe
nothing can be done about the global devastation that will affect
nearly every man woman and child in the world, in some way or
another. Whether it is a family member or friend getting sick, or
someone they know or love affected by the sea life damage, or the
ecosystem damage as we have already seen that starfish are turning to
goo, everything is connected somehow in nature and whether something
can be done or not, isn’t the point.
Our
health, our economy, our food and so much more will continue to be
affected for decades.
No
one is highlighting it more than a story here, a story there, without
looking at the big picture.
People
across the world have the right know all the facts, whether it can be
fixed or not and governments are downplaying those facts and the
media is complicit by following along like good little puppies.
It
is noteworthy that things may be about to get worse very soon as
Fukushima is readying to remove 400
tons of spent fuel.
“The
operation to begin removing fuel from such a severely damaged pool
has never been attempted before. The rods are unwieldy and very
heavy, each one weighing two-thirds of a ton,” fallout
researcher Christina Consolo earlier told
RT.
As
can be seen by the top comment from the video, shown below, this man
is providing information people are desperate for, but no one else is
offering.
The
way I see it is! we are living on borrowed time at best 5 years.Then
it will be hell on earth.I feel for the children.The horror that they
will see. BeautifulGirlByDana I salute you bud for trying to warn
people.You Sir are a great help
putting
this info out.So people can prepare.I hope this will not be your last
vid.Chin up bud
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.