Thursday 28 November 2013

Hatrick Penry on Fukushima Reactor no. 4

Mike Ruppert admits that he has been wrong about Fukushima #4

I spent 21 years dedicated to 12 Step recovery and still today try to live by those principles every day. One of essential components of that spiritual walk is that whenever we discover that we have been wrong (incorrect is less judgmental), we promptly admit it openly and change (amend) our behavior.

For maybe two months I pushed aside Hatrick Penry's work. There were many reasons and they all fall under the heading of personal faults for which I alone am responsible.

1. There was too much material. I was working 16 hours a day already and I, feeling my years, did not force myself to examine it all. Hatrick Penry is my karmic payback for all of the reading I have made others do throughout my journey.

2. When the material was first presented to me it was packaged in messages that said that 3/11 was a deliberately-orchestrated event like 9-11. Inasmuch as it is increasingly appearing that Fukushima is likely life-terminating for everything (including the elites in charge) I could not envision a motive (and still can't). I concede the possibility now that it was a deliberate man made event because I can no longer eliminate that as a possibility. We all still need to see a motive. Population reduction does not wash because there is no way to control the outcome with this much radiation out there. Plants and animals are dying too and man cannot live outside the web of life.

3. By mid-November, however, it was glaringly obvious that what was transpiring around SFP 4 was an insulting, tissue-paper thin deception. What had been abundant news coverage about leaks and failures at Fukushima dried up as fast as SFP 4's cooling water. It was then that Hatrick Penry's superb documentation began to obviously correspond more to the actual physical realities, what we were observing, than the trickle of news stories about the phony removal of the non-existent contents of SFP 4.

4. Rags, my dog went missing on Nov 15 and I spent 5 frantic days searching for him as it became more and more clear that Hatrick Penry was driving nails of good documentary analysis left and right. I was unable to keep up.

This is how we arrived at what I have done since last Sunday.

My entire career is based upon using the exact same methodology to analyze documents that Hatrick Penry uses. He is absolutely excellent and judicious at it. I am mightily impressed. He is circumspect and very careful to cross reference. He takes great care to document every assertion, just as I always have.

So, I sincerely apologize for not getting on top of this sooner or adding my voice and energy to this message before now. I am older now and losing a little steam but I can hand off the baton and say that I couldn't do any better with the documents than he is doing right now.

This is the way it's done. This is the way it's done right.

Listen to the man. Listen to the man.

Final analysis on Unit 4 hoax, evidence on Unit 3, Plume-Gate highlights

@20:16 email is from Voglewede, John
Entire document found here (email on pg 416): ‪ 

NRC officials Jaczko and Casto on Unit 4 link to NRC FOIA document...incredible evidence: 


SitRep Unit 4 dry document found here: ‪

NRC FOIA documents pertaining to Japan: ‪

Something Wicked This Way Comes: The story of Plume-Gate, the world's largest, provable cover-up: ‪

Fear and Loathing on Fukushima Unit 4 (a profuse amount of FOIA evidence on Unit 4 SFP): ‪

Video: Unit 4 hoax underway: ‪

Just as Shazzam and I suspected they are removing the UNUSED fuel rods that would NOT have produced heat like used fuel rods do, especially if they are from a fresh offload. The other fuel inventory has likely been reduced to rubble.
"22 unused fuels will be moved to the cask a task which is planned to be completed by November 19" ~TEPCO press release found here: ‪

TEPCO warns media about filming Unit 4 offload:
"Nov. 21, 2013: [...] we have noticed that some news media released videos, taken from the air, of the on-premise transportation from the Unit 4 Reactor Building to the Common Pool Building [...] Some of those videos contain information (such as the transportation schedule, a route of the transportation, and activities of security guards) the disclosure of which conflicts with "Measures To Be Taken for Physical Protection of Specific Nuclear Fuel Material" stipulated in the Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law. The regulatory agency is also aware of this matter, and instructed us to request the media to act with attention to physical protection. As we have already requested the media members on many occasions, in view of physical protection, please refrain from taking pictures and videos of the physical protection facilities such as the building entrances and exits, fences, sensors, and cameras as well as the cask transportation currently conducted. [*Physical protection: To protect nuclear materials and facilities against the theft or unauthorized diversion of nuclear materials and against the sabotage of nuclear facilities]"

TEPCO press release for above quote found here: ‪

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.