Spent
Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly Being 'Unloaded' By TEPCO Nov. 2013, The
Coverup Continues
26
November, 2013
Thanks
to Anne on Enenews; There were 204 new fuel assemblies in SFP #4
according to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, CNSC Fukushima Task
Force Report, INFO-0824, October 2011, p. 6:
Table
2.2 shows the inventory of fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pools in
units 1 to 4. Table 2.2 Spent Fuel Pool Inventories (fuel assemblies)
Unit
Fuel in reactor Spent fuel in pool New fuel in pool
#1
400 292 100
#2
548 587 28
#3
548 514 52
#4
0 1,331 204
TEPCO
proudly announced that they had finished taking out all 22 new fuel
assemblies last week and and that another 2 new fuel assemblies were
removed last July. That is all well and good. We can all agree that
24 total fuel assemblies were removed from SFP #4 at Fukushima
Daichi.
We
just have a teensy weensy problem here... According to the inventory
above, spent fuel pool #4 should have contained 204 new fuel
assemblies, not just 24.
204
-
24 removed by Nov. 2013
------
180
left to go, correct? There should still be another 180 MOX
plutonium fuel assemblies in the #4 spent fuel pool, if indeed this
is what the videos are showing. Maybe this is Daini we are looking
at, not Daichi? Maybe this is another nuclear plant somewhere else
entirely?
TEPCO
is claiming that ALL of the new fuel assumblies were removed from
SPF#4. So what happened to the other 180 fresh fuel assemblies
containing MOX plutonium fuel? Did terrorists steal them while no one
was looking? Did the Japanese mafia that supplies all of the workers
on site steal them and sell them on the black market? Did the
military take them? Are we even talking about the same spent fuel
pool, or is this just another smoke and mirrors lie conjured up by
the great magicians at TEPCO in the land of nuclear OZ?
These
nuclear 'experts' are so adept at lying, deception and cover ups, who
knows what is really going on? The IAEA is nothing more than a
marketing arm of the nuclear agency, so they seem incapable of doing
any real oversight, much less reporting about what is really going on
at Fukushima or anywhere else.
The
regulatory agencies in Japan are seemingly useless and worthless. The
Japanese government seems to just want to not spend any money on
anything and pretend it all away, while doing little or nothing. They
sure do not want to talk about reality. Meanwhile, we have 400 tons
of highly radioactive water going into the ocean per day, with
nothing being done about it. We also have 3 melted coriums under the
ground. TEPCO says it does not know 'where' the coriums are from the
three reactor melt downs.
But
let's start with something simpler, like the TEPCO claims about
Building #4. TEPCO claims that Fukushima Daichi Building #4 never
blew up. They say that all of the damage in the video below for
building #4 came through a pipe connecting building #3 with #4. They
say this pipe caused a transfer of some of the explosive gases from
#3 to create all of this damage.. What do you think?
Does
this look like a transfer of explosive gases coming from the reactor
next door? There are no photographs or videos of Building #4
exploding, but that does not mean it never happened. Obviously
building #4 blew up. We just have never been provided with video of
the actual event. No one can dispute that Building #4 blew up; not
even TEPCO.
Our
thought is that if a pipe really did transfer this much explosive
force, enough to blow out concrete panels and rip them from concrete
reinforcing rods, while blowing off the whole roof and bulging out
the concrete walls on the loading door, and cracking the wall at the
base of the building where the whole building is connected to the
foundation, then the pipe itself would have split open and exploded
out of the ground, BEFORE that amount of instantaneous force could
have reached building #4. It would help to know what kind of pipes
connect the buildings. Is this 'pipe' made of PVC, ABS, tin,
galvanized sheet metal, or something else?
Here
is a picture of a major crack in the based of the south wall of
Fukushima reactor 4…Posted on May 20, 2012
If
the building #3 did not cause the #4 building to explode, then WHAT
on Earth did that damage? It had to be either the reactor, which was
supposedly empty, or the spent fuel pool, correct? But the problems
start from there. If either one or both of them exploded like #3 did,
then we have major problems with believing anything is left inside of
spent fuel pool #4.
Here
is a photo that provides proof that TEPCO is lying once again.. This
is a satellite photo that shows Building #4 intact and will all walls
still there, while the #1 and 3 Buildings are in ruins after having
exploded.. You will have to hunt very long to find a photo like this,
because the web has been 'scrubbed' clean of all of this kind of
evidence, which does not fit the fairytales that TEPCO is telling in
the land beyond OZ.
So
now we get back to the truth. An explosion coming from either a spent
fuel pool (#4 reactor is empty, remember) does not just leave all of
the racks in place, neatly tied up with a bow. A major explosion like
this would cause damage to the pool at the very least, and this is
confirmed by the FOIA documents which say that the pool was 'emptied'
of water due to a crack, and that all of the fuel inside melted down.
Now
on to the next lie.. First, the building never really exploded. Then
TEPCO claims that SFP#4 never really dried out, caught on fire, and
that nothing really melted down inside of it. According to TEPCO, the
building never blew up by itself, and no fires or meltdowns happened
in the SFP#4. The fuel pool is still there, and all of the spent fuel
is still inside of SFP#4. The tank is in good enough shape to take
out and move all of the fuel inside of it, with a simple pulling arm.
Now
we are a week or two into this spent fuel removal process and we have
the TEPCO claim that all new fuel assemblies have been removed, when
any 5th grader can see that this is an obvious lie. What will be the
next lie and coverup? This story is wilder than any TV prime time
drama. This story should be on the nightly news, or it should be a
reality TV show, where people can vote on whether what is being shown
is a lie or the truth...
Bottom
line, the video at the very beginning of this article has much more
possibility of being true, when we compared it to what TEPCO is
claiming in their wild eyed, fairytale theories and garbage in
computer models, with no actual independent third party evidence. If
they can get an independent outside third party engineer team in
there, headed by someone like Arnie Gunderson, and he reports that
the spent fuel is all there and undamaged in spent fuel pool #4,
great. If that happened, that would be something to hang a hat on.
But
at this point TEPCO has lost so much credibility that one has look at
everything TEPCO says, photographs or videotapes with a great deal of
suspicious, distrust and outright disbelief, just because they have
lied so much in the past and they continue to lie even today. One
thing we can count on, is that the truth is usually, often, mostly or
always very far away from what TEPCO initially reports.
Where
is the verification by outside investigative journalists not tied to
the nuclear industry? Who is protecting the public interest? Who is
watching out for the global village and the billions of people
globally who keep breathing in the hot particles from Fukushima even
to this day?
Where
is the reporting about the massive amounts of plutonium that came out
of Fukushima? Where is the reporting about the underground coriums
and the constant flow of liquid high level radiation into the
Pacific? Where is the reporting about the barges going into and out
of the Fukushima harbor, loaded with who knows what? Where is the
reporting about the 'evaporative' fuel ponds, and the amount of
radiation released from those 'ponds'?
Where
is the reporting about the specific levels of radiation in the dumped
radioactive waste water coming directly from their water 'filtering'
operations; at 12:16 into this next video? Then look at the huge
amount of water streaming from the canal out of Fukushima at 13:35.
They say that they are 'checking' this water before releasing it..
But who is checking the radiation levels, before they dump this into
the ocean, via the green line?
In
the video above, TEPCO makes the claim that no radiation is being
found by them in the ocean outside of the plant. Who is confirming
this claim, made as of Sept. 2013? A few months before this, there
were stories of wildly increasing radiation levels and all of this
going into the ocean, plus high levels of radiation being found in
the fish and in ocean water. Now, a few months after this out of
control emergency with everything going downhill fast, all of a
sudden, with no changes in anything, everything is back to normal and
'safe'. The radiation emergency completely disappeared, fish are safe
to eat, the ocean is radiation free, and everyone is happy, according
to the TEPCO happy news channel. Do you believe it?
Because
no outside investigative media is allowed free reign at Fukushima,
truth is NOT happening yet, amongst any of the present players in
this deception and lie riddled nuclear shell game. The world knows
about 1% of what is really going on at Fukushima Daichi and in the
nuclear industry in general.
99%
of what happened or what is NOW happening at Fukushima is still
hidden away, in deep dark secret closets that NO ONE is allowed to
talk about. And the new state secrets bill that was just passed will
just shove these secrets deeper into the closet, when what is needed
is an airing out and truth telling.
Epic article... THANKYOU!
ReplyDeleteThey weren't two 'new' spent fuel assemblies; they were hot fuel from the reactor, thus the last to be removed. As Arnie Gundersen has pointed out, they can begin by taking out the oldest ones first.
ReplyDeleteTwo fuel assemblies supposedly taken out previously is simply another big lie. Could not have been done in open air - pyrophoric.
Note they said 1,535 fuel assemblies, after the two were supposedly removed, they repeatedly reported 1,533... but now? "over 1,500."
They rely on people having a short memory, especially about accidents. But we have so many of us tracking the whole fiasco.
The industry White Paper, discussed by Prof Koide in June 2011 lecture:
“Nuclear Safety Commission publishes “White Paper...” Professor calls them “Nuclear Safety Propaganda Commission” The Paper published in 2000, the year after the JCO accident states: “Many who work in the field of nuclear power do not really think that nuclear power is really safe.” What do you think? Go ask the Chugoku Electric Power Company. They've been saying it's absolutely safe for decades, but today maybe not. They might have doubts now, but they've continued to say it's safe. In the paper it's “Many in the nuclear field don't think nuclear is absolutely safe.” It means they're aware of the inherent danger of it. [1:21:55]
They go on to explain how the false myth of safety was created, and they name the following reasons: “Excessive trust in the safety standard of plant design.
“Excessive confidence in the absence of accidents in the past.
“Erosion of memory of past accidents.
“Efficient measures to promote public acceptance when constructing nuclear facilities.”
They're talking about cheating people?
The last item is this:
“The hope for absolute security.” But accidents do happen. “
Combination of paraphrasing and verbatim notes of the video – Marushka France
http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2011/06/16/prof-hiroaki-koide-of-kyoto-university-on-the-ugly-truth-about-the-nuclear-disasters-of-chernobyl-and-fukushima-video/