War
On All Fronts
Washington's
three-front war: Syria, Lebanon, Iran in the Middle East, China in
the Far East, Russia in Europe.
by
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
23
July, 2012
The
Russian government has finally caught on that its political
opposition is being financed by the US taxpayer-funded National
Endowment for Democracy and other CIA/State Department fronts in an
attempt to subvert the Russian government and install an American
puppet state in the geographically largest country on earth, the one
country with a nuclear arsenal sufficient to deter Washington’s
aggression.
Just
as earlier this year Egypt expelled hundreds of people associated
with foreign-funded “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) for
“instilling dissent and meddling in domestic policies,” the
Russian Duma (parliament) has just passed a law that Putin is
expected to sign that requires political organizations that receive
foreign funding to register as foreign agents. The law is based on
the US law requiring the registration of foreign agents.
Much
of the Russian political opposition consists of foreign-paid agents,
and once the law passes leading elements of the Russian political
opposition will have to sign in with the Russian Ministry of Justice
as foreign agents of Washington. The Itar-Tass News Agency reported
on July 3 that there are about 1,000 organizations in Russia that are
funded from abroad and engaged in political activity. Try to imagine
the outcry if the Russians were funding 1,000 organizations in the US
engaged in an effort to turn America into a Russian puppet state. (In
the US the Russians would find a lot of competition from Israel.)
The
Washington-funded Russian political opposition masquerades behind
“human rights” and says it works to “open Russia.” What the
disloyal and treasonous Washington-funded Russian “political
opposition” means by “open Russia” is to open Russia for
brainwashing by Western propaganda, to open Russia to economic
plunder by the West, and to open Russia to having its domestic and
foreign policies determined by Washington.
“Non-governmental
organizations” are very governmental. They have played pivotal
roles in both financing and running the various “color revolutions”
that have established American puppet states in former constituent
parts of the Soviet Empire. NGOs have been called “coup d’etat
machines,” and they have served Washington well in this role. They
are currently working in Venezuela against Chavez.
Of
course, Washington is infuriated that its plans for achieving
hegemony over a country too dangerous to attack militarily have been
derailed by Russia’s awakening, after two decades, to the threat of
being politically subverted by Washington-financed NGOs. Washington
requires foreign-funded organizations to register as foreign agents
(unless they are Israeli funded). However, this fact doesn’t stop
Washington from denouncing the new Russian law as “anti-democratic,”
“police state,” blah-blah. Caught with its hand in subversion,
Washington calls Putin names. The pity is that most of the
brainwashed West will fall for Washington’s lies, and we will hear
more about “gangster state Russia.”
China
is also in Washington’s crosshairs. China’s rapid rise as an
economic power is perceived in Washington as a dire threat. China
must be contained. Obama’s US Trade Representative has been
secretly negotiating for the last 2 or 3 years a Trans Pacific
Partnership, whose purpose is to derail China’s natural economic
leadership in its own sphere of influence and replace it with
Washington’s leadership.
Washington
is also pushing to form new military alliances in Asia and to
establish new military bases in the Philippines, S. Korea, Thailand,
Vietnam, Australia, New Zealand, and elsewhere.
Washington
quickly inserted itself into disputes between China and Vietnam and
China and the Philippines. Washington aligned with its former
Vietnamese enemy in Vietnam’s dispute with China over the resource
rich Paracel and Spratly islands and with the Philippines in its
dispute with China over the resource rich Scarborough Shoal.
Thus,
like England’s interference in the dispute between Poland and
National Socialist Germany over the return to Germany of German
territories that were given to Poland as World War I booty,
Washington sets the stage for war.
China
has been cooperative with Washington, because the offshoring of the
US economy to China was an important component in China’s
unprecedented high rate of economic development. American capitalists
got their short-run profits, and China got the capital and technology
to build an economy that in another 2 or 3 years will have surpassed
the sinking US economy. Jobs offshoring, mistaken for free trade by
free market economists, has built China and destroyed America.
Washington’s
growing interference in Chinese affairs has convinced China’s
government that military countermeasures are required to neutralize
Washington’s announced intentions to build its military presence in
China’s sphere of influence. Washington’s view is that only
Washington, no one else, has a sphere of influence, and Washington’s
sphere of influence is the entire world.
On
July 14 China’s official news agency, Xinhua, said that Washington
was interfering in Chinese affairs and making China’s disputes with
Vietnam and the Philippines impossible to resolve.
It
looks as if an over-confident US government is determined to have a
three-front war: Syria, Lebanon, and Iran in the Middle East, China
in the Far East, and Russia in Europe. This would appear to be an
ambitious agenda for a government whose military was unable to occupy
Iraq after nine years or to defeat the lightly-armed Taliban after
eleven years, and whose economy and those of its NATO puppets are in
trouble and decline with corresponding rising internal unrest and
loss of confidence in political leadership.
Paul
Craig Roberts served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in
the Reagan
Administration earning fame as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1]
He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall
Street Journal, Business
Week, and Scripps
Howard News Service who has testified before congressional
committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.