Lying
Libor Is Nothing Compared to China’s Fake GDP: Report
A
fake Libor rate, the scandal involving global benchmark interest
rates that has raised the level of distrust in major banks and
markets, is nothing compared to the damage that could be done if
China’s true economic growth figures were revealed, according to
Larry McDonald’s newsletter.
CNBC,
22
July, 2012
Is
Chinese GDP the new Libor?” asked McDonald, author of “A Colossal
Failure of Common Sense: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Lehman
Brothers,” in a much talked about note to clients last week. “More
and more investors are starting to question the Chinese math on GDP.”
Annual
gross domestic product came in at 7.6 percent in the second quarter,
according to China’s government on July 13th. The report was better
than investors expected, easing concern of a dramatic slowdown for
the world’s second-biggest economy and sparking a bid in risk
assets like stocks that has lasted for two weeks.
But
slowing imports and industrial production, as well as harder-to-fudge
electricity usage data, points to much slower growth, according to
McDonald and other investors. Barclays believes the number should
have been more like 7.15 percent.
What
worries McDonald, a former vice president at Lehman, is that lying by
governments and banks — be it Libor rates or GDP statistics —
raises the systemic risk to the markets, which is much worse than
just economic risk.
“As
difficult as economically driven market sell offs are, they do not
compare to 2011, 2008, 1929 and 1907,” wrote McDonald. “A look
through history shows traditional economically driven sell offs range
from 5-15%, or one standard deviation. Systemic risk sell offs, 2008
and 2011 are 25-50%, or two standard deviations.”
Governments
not being forthright is happening right now in Europe, with the Bank
of Spain the latest to update its number of actual bad loans.
“One
of the primary reasons for Japan’s lost decade was their
government’s cover up of bank losses,” said McDonald. “The
faster pain is taken, the faster the return to healthy markets.”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.