Comment
by Stacy Herbert:
With
the relentless assault of PIPA, SOPA, ACTA type ‘intellectual
property’ type laws having taken up activist attention, it seems we
weren’t ready for the IP police. No doubt they will remain deployed
post-Olympics and, in fact, be coming to a town near you.
Britain
flooded with 'brand police' to protect sponsors
Olympic
security is in disarray, but organisers are taking no chances with
corporate deals...
16
July, 2012
Hundreds
of uniformed Olympics officers will begin touring the country today
enforcing sponsors' multimillion-pound marketing deals, in a highly
organised mission that contrasts with the scramble to find enough
staff to secure Olympic sites.
Almost
300 enforcement officers will be seen across the country checking
firms to ensure they are not staging "ambush marketing" or
illegally associating themselves with the Games at the expense of
official sponsors such as Adidas, McDonald's, Coca-Cola and BP. The
clampdown goes on while 3,500 soldiers on leave are brought in to
bail out the security firm G4S which admitted it could not supply the
numbers of security staff it had promised.
Yesterday,
the Culture Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, refused to rule out that even
more soldiers may be called upon to help with security, but dismissed
the issue as merely a "hitch". However, as well as the
regular Army, the Olympic "brand army" will start its work
with a vengeance today.
Wearing
purple caps and tops, the experts in trading and advertising working
for the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) are heading the biggest
brand protection operation staged in the UK. Under legislation
specially introduced for the London Games, they have the right to
enter shops and offices and bring court action with fines of up to
£20,000.
Olympics
organisers have warned businesses that during London 2012 their
advertising should not include a list of banned words, including
"gold", "silver" and "bronze",
"summer", "sponsors" and "London".
Publicans
have been advised that blackboards advertising live TV coverage must
not refer to beer brands or brewers without an Olympics deal, while
caterers and restaurateurs have been told not to advertise dishes
that could be construed as having an association with the event.
At
the 40 Olympics venues, 800 retailers have been banned from serving
chips to avoid infringing fast-food rights secured by McDonald's.
Marina
Palomba, for the McCann Worldgroup agency in London, described the
rules as "the most draconian law in advance of an Olympic Games
ever". The ODA and Locog (London Organising Committee of the
Olympic Games) say the rules are necessary to protect brands.
"These
rights are acquired by companies who invest millions of pounds to
help support the staging of the Games," Locog said. "People
who seek the same benefits for free – by engaging in ambush
marketing or producing counterfeit goods – are effectively
depriving the Games of revenue."
Some
£1.4bn of the Games' £11.4bn budget comes from private sector
sponsors. The International Olympic Committee's 11 global partners,
including Coca-Cola, Visa and Proctor & Gamble, are contributing
£700m while £700m comes from London 2012 partners, including
Adidas, BT, EDF, and Lloyds TSB.
The
scale of the brand enforcement squad is nonetheless likely to
intensify criticism that the Olympics has become too corporate. Paul
Jordan, an expert in brand protection at Bristows solicitors who
advises firms on the rules, said they were almost certainly tougher
than at previous Olympics. "No other brands would have people
walking the streets being their eyes and ears, protecting their
interests," he said.
A
spokesman for the Olympic Delivery Authority, whose team of 286
enforcement officers have been seconded from 30 local councils, said
it had a duty to ensure businesses were meeting the rules.
"We
are using experienced local authority staff who currently enforce
street trading and advertising legislation. They have all been fully
trained," the spokesman said.
"Deliberate
ambush offences will be dealt with using the full enforcement powers
conferred on officers."
US
agents to secure London Olympics after G4S fiasco
The
British government has been forced to draft in US security agents at
a number of airports including London’s Heathrow to cover for its
fiasco of trusting the private firm G4S with a key part of Olympics
security.
16
July, 2012
The
Department of Transport has hammered a deal with the US
Transportation Security Authority to use US security officers at
several British airports from one week before the Olympics to one
week after the Paralympics end, the Sky News reported.
The
British Home Office is under huge pressure to fill in the gap created
by G4S’s failure to supply 13,700 forces for Olympics security.
The
Home Office has already asked the army and the police to provide it
with more forces for the Olympics security after G4S announced it has
only 4,000 staff available for the Games.
The
British army is now deploying almost one fifth of its total strength
to the Olympics while 9 out of 12 police forces will be watching the
Games.
However,
the security black hole has forced the government to even bring in
security staff from the US to secure the Games.
Olympic
arrivals messed up on 1st day
London
has messed it on the first day of athletes and other Olympic VIPs
arrivals after the US athletics team were stranded in traffic for
four hours before arriving at the Olympic Village.
16
July, 2012
US
Beijing Olympics hurdling gold-medalist Kerron Clement embarrassed
British officials who introduced the VIPs lane for a 45-minute
journey from Heathrow Airport to the Games Village, tweeting his
frustration that the team could not make it to the village after four
hours.
Clement
tweeted that they got lost on the way to Stratford where the Olympic
Village is located after an over-night transatlantic flight from the
US.
“Um,
so we've been lost on the road for 4hrs. Not a good first impression
London,” he tweeted before running out of patience and writing
“could we get to the Olympic Village please.”
His
tweet ran contrary to what the Games organizing committee LOCOG
claimed to be a “completely successful” first day of arrivals.
“It
is day one of team arrivals. We have successfully completed a large
number of bus journeys so far today, from the airport, to the village
and the training venues. Whilst there may have been one or two
journeys taking longer than planned, the vast majority were completed
successfully,” a spokesman said.
The
US athletics team was not the only casualty of a 236,955-passenger
rush to London on Monday as a media shuttle bus also got lost en
route to Stratford.



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.