Comments
from Mike Ruppert -
I
believe that the reality is starting to sink in that so much
radiation has been released from Fukushima that our fates may have
already been sealed. Bear in mind that none of the continuing
releases over the last 32 months have been stopped yet. Every day the
rads just keep on pumping.
300
tons of radioactive water a day, plus many direct discharges from
nearly full and deteriorating storage tanks. Add to that, recent
stories here confirming that TEPCO is just going to dump contaminated
water directly into the Pacific seeing no other options.
Japan
continually incinerating radioactive waste directly into the
atmosphere. I thought this had been stopped but in recent weeks we
have seen multiple confirmations that it has never stopped.
Atmospheric readings are currently showing the highest levels of
radiation in North America since the earthquake. They have been
posted here.
Emissions
from three cores deep in the ground through ground water and
occasional (perhaps continual) steam venting into the atmosphere.
FOIA
documents from the NRC shown by Hatrick Penry saying that 100% of the
fuel pool at #4 burned in the original fuel pool/zirconium fires
after the explosion. (This may or may not be accurate. We simply
cannot know.) Personally, I believe that a sizable amount of spent
fuel remains at 4 but that much more was burned and released than has
been admitted.
A
fuel pool above the exploded Unit 3 that is no longer visible in any
photograph. Where is it? Where is that spent fuel?
Spent
fuel pools at 1 & 2, the conditions of which cannot be known (or
haven't been disclosed) because the areas are too hot. According to
Helen Caldicott there are/were six spent fuel pools at Daichi.
And
now this...
“A
very alarmingly high number”
Magazine:
Fukushima released up to 100,000 times more cesium-137 in surface
ocean waters than Chernobyl or nuclear weapons testing
23
November, 2013
|
Oceanus
Magazine,
May 2013: Prior to Fukushima, however, the levels of cesium-137 off
the coast of Japan, as cataloged by Michio Aoyama at the
Meteorological Research Institute in Japan and others, were among the
world’s lowest, at around 2 becquerels per cubic meter (1
becquerel, or Bq, equals one radioactive decay event per second).
Against this background, the concentrations measured in early April
of 2011 were all the more alarming. […] The amount of cesium-137
radioisotopes from the Fukushima disaster in surface ocean waters was
10,000 to 100,000 times greater than amounts that entered the ocean
from the Chernobyl accident or atmospheric nuclear weapons
tests.
Ken Buesseler, Senior scientist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, March 11, 2013: I’ve had to use this crazy tall and logarithmic scale to get the range of concentrations […] how much cesium was in the ocean off Japan. Each red point is a sampling by an individual taken in, actually released by TEPCO. A little complicated to find the data but they were openly released and I translated them to the right units and made some corrections. Each red dot will tell me how much radioactivity was at that point along the coast on a given date. So they start out here around 10,000, the very first measurements that were made, peaking up here, up to 50 million [becquerels per cubic meter]. That’s a very alarmingly high number [...]
Ken Buesseler, Senior scientist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, March 11, 2013: I’ve had to use this crazy tall and logarithmic scale to get the range of concentrations […] how much cesium was in the ocean off Japan. Each red point is a sampling by an individual taken in, actually released by TEPCO. A little complicated to find the data but they were openly released and I translated them to the right units and made some corrections. Each red dot will tell me how much radioactivity was at that point along the coast on a given date. So they start out here around 10,000, the very first measurements that were made, peaking up here, up to 50 million [becquerels per cubic meter]. That’s a very alarmingly high number [...]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.