CAMS changes its presentation of methane data without notice

CAMS does a sleight-of-hand with methane data
Seemorerocks

A few days ago I reported on the very high levels of methane in the Arctic and elsewhere.

What the hell is going on in the Arctic - Is there a methane ‘event’ happening?

I followed up with an internal comparison of data from CAMS to illustrate the rapid increase from the end of May when Margo interviewed Guy McPherson.

Methane levels have increased since a methane spike in late- May and have not got down since

You can see my video, CAMS' sleight-of-hand and extremely high methane emissions HERE

The CAMS data does not provide any figures but uses colour coding to illustrate the different levels.

To get some classification Margo opened up a ticket with CAMS:

I've noticed a discrepancy between the methane level coding chart on some of your pages and was wondering which is correct. I usually use this page to enter your website https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/charts/cams/methane-forecasts?facets=undefined&time=2018120600,3,2018120603&projection=classical_north_pole&layer_name=composition_ch4_surface. It shows the high end of methane as being 75,600 PPB.

However if you enter the website here: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/charts/cams/ and then click on methane forecasts, the high end of methane reads 2,320 PPB. Could you please clarify which is the correct one? Thank you.

To date no reply (but only an acknowledgement ) has been received.

Instead, over exactly the same time period, CAMS have done a sleight-of-hand whereby without removing or falsifying any data they have changed the colour coding to provide a mistaken impression that emissions are much lower than what, in fact, they are.

A more detailed discussion is here:

Please compare this which comes from today...

With this...

By this morning i had changed. 

With this latest data I caught from CAMS.  Last thing last night (Tuesday morning, European time) the information was in the same format.

Here we are again..

And this morning this is how the global view looked.

All that blue! Methane emissions must be low then? That's about 1800 ppb in the Southern hemisphere, which used to be the previous average.

This is from earlier in the year.

Here is a comparison between the three forms of colour coding.

The EU-based CAMS have followed the EU bureaucratic model while in the United States NOAA seems to leave out inconvenient data.

Here's one example. Sometimes they tell us that there is no data from the entire Siberia!!

2323 ppb - NOAA is back to playing their insane games and pretending that the satellite missed several of its orbits of the Earth. Any Lie at any Time to please Trump and his Mass Murdering Criminal Administration (sic)  ---Joe Neubarth

If you want PROOF of data manipulation (this time by NASA Worldview) here it is!

This NASA Worldview satellite image is from February 4, 2016 and shows jet-laid particulate trails blanketing the air above the Republic of Cyprus but nearly absent in surrounding regions.

When I checked the above (with the same date stamp) all the jet-laid particulate trails had been removed by NASA and replaced by blue sky!

None of this is made up!