'Damned if we do and damned if we don't'
This information seems to have been buried by the makers of the 2005 documentary.
Dimming
appears to be caused by air pollution.
But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out.
This information seems to have been buried by the makers of the 2005 documentary.
Why
the Sun seems to be 'dimming'
BBC,
13
January, 2005
We
are all seeing rather less of the Sun, according to scientists who
have been looking at five decades of sunlight measurements.
They
have reached the disturbing conclusion that the amount of solar
energy reaching the Earth's surface has been gradually falling.
Paradoxically,
the decline in sunlight may mean that global warming is a far greater
threat to society than previously thought.
The
effect was first spotted by Gerry Stanhill, an English scientist
working in Israel.
Cloud
changes
Comparing
Israeli sunlight records from the 1950s with current ones, Dr
Stanhill was astonished to find a large fall in solar radiation.
"There
was a staggering 22% drop in the sunlight, and that really amazed
me." Intrigued, he searched records from all around the world,
and found the same story almost everywhere he looked.
Sunlight
was falling by 10% over the USA, nearly 30% in parts of the former
Soviet Union, and even by 16% in parts of the British Isles.
Although
the effect varied greatly from place to place, overall the decline
amounted to one to two per cent globally every decade between the
1950s and the 1990s.
Dr
Stanhill called it "global dimming", but his research,
published in 2001, met a sceptical response from other scientists.
It
was only recently, when his conclusions were confirmed by Australian
scientists using a completely different method to estimate solar
radiation, that climate scientists at last woke up to the reality of
global dimming.
Burning
coal, oil and wood, whether in cars, power stations or cooking fires,
produces not only invisible carbon dioxide - the principal greenhouse
gas responsible for global warming - but also tiny airborne particles
of soot, ash, sulphur compounds and other pollutants.
This
visible air pollution reflects sunlight back into space, preventing
it reaching the surface. But the pollution also changes the optical
properties of clouds.
Because
the particles seed the formation of water droplets, polluted clouds
contain a larger number of droplets than unpolluted clouds.
Recent
research shows that this makes them more reflective than they would
otherwise be, again reflecting the Sun's rays back into space.
Scientists
are now worried that dimming, by shielding the oceans from the full
power of the Sun, may be disrupting the pattern of the world's
rainfall.
There
are suggestions that dimming was behind the droughts in sub-Saharan
Africa which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in the 1970s and
80s.
There
are disturbing hints the same thing may be happening today in Asia,
home to half the world's population.
"My
main concern is global dimming is also having a detrimental impact on
the Asian monsoon," says Professor Veerhabhadran Ramanathan,
professor of climate and atmospheric sciences at the University of
California, San Diego. "We are talking about billions of
people."
Alarming
energy
But
perhaps the most alarming aspect of global dimming is that it may
have led scientists to underestimate the true power of the greenhouse
effect.
They
know how much extra energy is being trapped in the Earth's atmosphere
by the extra carbon dioxide we have placed there.
What
has been surprising is that this extra energy has so far resulted in
a temperature rise of just 0.6 degree Celsius.
This
has led many scientists to conclude that the present-day climate is
less sensitive to the effects of carbon dioxide than it was, say,
during the ice age, when a similar rise in CO2 led to a temperature
rise of six degrees Celsius.
But it now appears the warming from greenhouse gases has been offset by a strong cooling effect from dimming - in effect two of our pollutants have been cancelling each other out.
This
means that the climate may in fact be more sensitive to the
greenhouse effect than previously thought.
If
so, then this is bad news, according to Dr Peter Cox, one of the
world's leading climate modellers.
As
things stand, CO2 levels are projected to rise strongly over coming
decades, whereas there are encouraging signs that particle pollution
is at last being brought under control.
"We're
going to be in a situation unless we act where the cooling pollutant
is dropping off while the warming pollutant is going up.
"That
means we'll get reducing cooling and increased heating at the same
time and that's a problem for us," says Dr Cox.
Even
the most pessimistic forecasts of global warming may now have to be
drastically revised upwards.
That
means a temperature rise of 10 degrees Celsius by 2100 could be on
the cards, giving the UK a climate like that of North Africa, and
rendering many parts of the world uninhabitable.
That
is unless we act urgently to curb our emissions of greenhouse gases.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.