Australian
Military Predicted Cafe Scenario 6 Weeks Ago!
15
December, 2013
It’s
a good thing that like 9/11 and 7/7 our military is training in
advance for the exact same scenarios they are being confronted with
on either the day the events occur or a couple of weeks later.
Because just like on and before 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings military drills were held foreshadowing those tragedies unfolding it seems that the Australian Military was training for a hostage situation in, you guessed it, A cafe in an inner city! Fancy that
And
just in case you’re wondering here is some more information on
Jabhat al Nusra and yes, you guessed it they have close ties with the
CIA and Qatar.
———————————————
A
recent interview given by: an ‘anonymous’ Qatari security
official, has shed further light on CIA-led covert arms shipments to
militants fighting in Syria. In this Reuters article,
the security official and several ‘anonymous’ rebel Commanders
confirm that Qatar has “tightened coordination of arms flows
[plural] to Syria,” under alleged concern of weapons ending up in
the hands of Al Qaeda linked Islamic extremist militants; the very
militants as noted previously,
that have continually formed the spearhead of the insurgency against
the Syrian Government:
“Rebel
fighters in Syria say that in recent months the system for
distributing arms has become more centralized, with arms being
delivered through opposition National Coalition’s General Command,
led by Selim Idriss, a general who defected to the opposition and is
a favorite of Washington.”(my
emphasis)
What
has been long confirmed by ‘official sources’ in the mainstream
press, is that these arms shipments commenced in at least “early
2012″. We can be sure, as with the majority of the official
timeline, that leeway has been given in these statements: its highly
likely smaller arms shipments/smuggling into Syria started much
earlier. Statements from
eyewitnesses in Libya confirm that arms shipments from the port of
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group stronghold Misrata, commenced rapidly
after the fall of Gaddafi. Sibel Edmonds also reported in November
2011, long before any corporate media revealed, that the CIA,
along with its Turkish and NATO counterparts had been working from
the “nerve
centre”at the joint US-Turkish air-base in Incerlik, Turkey,
since April/May of 2011, coordinating ‘rebel’ elements and
‘activist’s’. Edmonds posits the likely theory that this was
one of the initial staging grounds used by the CIA and its regional
partners, to smuggle weapons, fighters and materiel into Syria as the
insurgency took hold.
Enough
of this background information, ‘official sources’ and timeline
discrepancies gives the impression that the ‘news’ media is not
releasing information when it receives it, and is holding back
crucial pieces of the timeline, to fit into the desired narrative of
“Assad forces killing peaceful protesters”.
What
we learn from the Reuters report is that until Qatar (acting directly
under CIA auspices) chose to “tighten” the coordination of their
arms supplies into Syria, there was no coherent or structured way of
the arms being distributed once they reached the Syrian border:
“The
Qataris are now [May 2013] going through the Coalition for aid and
humanitarian issues and for military issues they are going through
the military command,” a commander in northern Syria interviewed
from Beirut said.
This
raises the immediate question: who were Qatar (under CIA auspices)
distributing the arms thousands of tonnes of arms to before April
2013? The report goes on to state:
“Before
the Coalition was formed they were going throughliaison
offices and other military and civil formations.
That was at the beginning. Now it is different – it is all going
through the Coalition and the military command.”
“There’s
a lot of consultation with the CIA,
and they help Qatar with buying and moving the weapons into Syria,
but just as consultants,” he said. The CIA declined to comment. (my
emphasis)
At
least a pinch of salt needs to be taken with this piece of
misinformation. What exactly are “liaison offices, military and
civil formations?” The ‘opposition’ has never had anything
resembling a military formation. Regardless, this raises several
important questions and draws several distinctions into the timeline
of the Syrian conflict.
We
have long known, the main supplier of arms to ‘rebels’ was and
still is Qatar, acting directly under the CIA’s “consultation”.
We also know that these arms shipments became a considerable amount
in “early 2012″ and continued to rise in both quantity and
frequency. A New
York Timesinvestigation confirmed this to be the case, reporting
that eighty-five military cargo planes flew from Qatar to Turkey
carrying arms bound for Syria between January 2012 and March 2013.
(the maximum load of an average military cargo plane is around 50-60
tonnes.) What other synonymous distinctions in the conflict do
we know about, that commenced and progressed from “early 2012″?
The
clearest and most glaring dynamic that occurred along this timeframe,
and also continued to rise and greatly increase, is both the death
toll, and displacement within Syria. As covered
extensively before, the monthly death toll in Syria almost
doubled in “early 2012″, and continued to rapidly increase. All
available resources and ‘activist’ or opposition groups death
toll figures roughly confirm this, as can be seen in this graph
compiled by Reuters:
One
other critical factor is directly synonymous with both the arms flow
increase, (under CIA/Qatari auspices) and the huge rise in death
toll. That being: the success, proliferation and bolstering of Jabhat
al Nusra and similar Salafi/Jihaddi militant groups. Jabhat al Nusra,
or, as they are now known: the Islamic State of Iraq and Al Sham,
(ISIS) were active in Syria under their ‘parent’ group the
Islamic State of Iraq’s (Al Qaeda in Iraq – AQI) auspices for
years prior to the Syrian uprising. Indeed, ever since the formation
of AQI itself the eastern regions of Syria, (bordering the west of
Iraq and the Anbar province) have been a hotbed for Al Qaeda activity
since its inception following the US invasion in 2003.
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.