Kim Dotcom fends off US bid to revoke bail
1
December, 2014
US
officials had sought to have Mr Dotcom sent back to prison, saying he
was a flight risk.
Judge
Nevin Dawson delivered his decision in the Auckland District Court
following a three-day hearing, during which lawyers for the US
Government argued he contacted a person he was not allowed to and
arranged to sell a $500,000 Rolls Royce Phantom which could be the
subject of a restraining order.
Listen
to more on Checkpoint ( 3 min 58 esc )
Lawyer Christine Gordon, QC, argued his bail should therefore be revoked and he should be remanded in custody until his extradition hearing in June.
Ms
Gordon said Mr Dotcom had also had an opportunity to salt money away.
But
Mr Dotcom's lawyer, Ron Mansfield, said there were moves to sell the
Rolls Royce because it was not an asset restrained by authorities.
Mr
Mansfield said while a 2008 Rolls Royce was seized, the other Rolls
Royce at the centre of the case was not. He said Mr Dotcom's wife,
Mona Dotcom, was pregnant and had no access to bank accounts. She
needed money to run the household and pay lawyers representing her
husband.
Mr Mansfield said the bid to sell the car was abandoned by Mrs Dotcom because she did not want to cause any trouble between the authorities and her husband.
However,
Judge Nevin Dawson said the court did not accept Mr Dotcom had hidden
money and it would be inappropriate to revoke bail.
He
banned Mr Dotcom from using helicopters or travelling by sea unless
it was by public transport.
He
also must report to the police station twice a week.
Kim Dotcom outside the Auckland District Court.
Photo: RNZ
/ Kim Baker WIlson
Outside
the Auckland District Court, Mr Dotcom said the new conditions were
unfair and amounted to bullying.
"I
think this is another example of harassment and bullying by the
United States Government, in concert with the New Zealand
Government," he said.
"I
think this whole application was only made because my lawyers decided
to resign."
Earlier,
he accused the FBI of being malicious and misleading and said he
expected to be allowed to return home to is family.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.