“Did you ever play pick up sticks?” asked a foreign nuclear expert who has been monitoring Tepco’s efforts to regain control of the plant. “You had 50 sticks, you heaved them into the air and than had to take one off the pile at a time. “If the pile collapsed when you were picking up a stick, you lost,”
Decommissioning
Fukushima: how Japan will remove nuclear fuel rods from damaged
reactor
Experts
say no one has ever attempted such a procedure before and that a
mistake could be disastrous
7
November, 2013
The
operator of Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant is soon to
begin the delicate and perilous process of removing 1,534 nuclear
fuel rods from a storage pool at the site.
In
the coming days it will begin a dry run of the procedure at the No. 4
reactor, which experts have warned carries grave risks. The operator
had been scheduled to start the actual removal on Friday, but the
Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organisation this week insisted that
Tokyo Electric Power Co. carry out a test to ensure that every part
of its plan goes smoothly, delaying the operation for some two weeks.
The
authorities' insistence on additional checks suggests there are
serious concerns about the ability of the utility to handle the
aftermath of the second-worst nuclear accident in history. Tepco's
very public failures in the 32 months since the plant was devastated
by the magnitude-9 earthquake and the tsunami that it triggered have
shaken confidence in Japan's nuclear industry, both here and around
the world.
And
despite the fears of nuclear energy experts, the Japanese public, the
government and environmental groups, all agree that the highly
irradiated spent fuel must be removed from the damaged storage pool
as swiftly as possible.
A
key concern is that another major earthquake could cause cracks in
the pool, which is nearly 100 feet above the ground, allow the
cooling water to escape and expose the rods to the air. That would
allow the zirconium alloy cladding to ignite and release radioactive
material into the air.
Equally,
a misjudgment during the operation to lift the rods out of the pool,
transfer them individually to a water-filled cask, lower that to the
flat-bed of a truck and then transport the rods to a more secure
storage site in the grounds of the power station could lead to
another massive release of radiation into the atmosphere.
Tepco
says it is confident that the 18-month manoeuvre will go off without
a hitch, emphasising that removing rods from a spent fuel pool "is
a normal operation that has been done at any nuclear power station,
even before the great earthquake."
The
company admits there are risks, however, and has publicly vowed to do
everything possible to ensure security "under safety-first
principles".
Tepco
has reinforced the pool containing the rods with concrete and steel
and says that tests have determined that the building is still
sufficiently strong to withstand another earthquake of the same
magnitude as the March 2011 tremor.
An
external crane to lift the rods out of the pool has been constructed
in a way that no extra weight is added to the shell of the No. 4
reactor building, while the entire procedure will be carried out
behind a shell to prevent radiation leaking into the surrounding
atmosphere.
Despite
all the security measures, experts and environmentalists point out
that Unit 4 at the plant contains 10 times as much caesium-137 than
was at Chernobyl and that nothing remotely similar has ever been
attempted before.
"Did
you ever play pick up sticks?" asked a foreign nuclear expert
who has been monitoring Tepco's efforts to regain control of the
plant. "You had 50 sticks, you heaved them into the air and than
had to take one off the pile at a time.
"If
the pile collapsed when you were picking up a stick, you lost,"
he said. "There are 1,534 pick-up sticks in a jumble in top of
an unsteady reactor 4. What do you think can happen?
"I
do not know anyone who is confident that this can be done since it
has never been tried."
Even
now, it is not clear whether any of the rods, containing transuranic
and transplutonic elements, are cracked, he said.
"At
the very least, if there was a catastrophic collapse, I assume there
will be a major airborne release of radiation," he said. "But
on the other hand, you have to do something."
Others
have issued even more dire warnings, with Charles Perrow, a professor
emeritus at Yale University, warning: "The radiation emitted
from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept
separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas,
including Tokyo.
"Because
of the radiation at the site, the 6,375 rods in the common storage
pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of
humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years."
Tepco
has focused its efforts on Unit 4 at the plant because it was not
operational at the time of the disaster and the reactor did not
experience a meltdown. Experts say this makes it the easiest of the
four reactors to deal with.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.