Israel's bottom line - there must be NO peace with Iran, at any cost
Iran was engaged in marathon talks with the P5+1 group of nations in Geneva this week, which it was hoped would produce an agreement on Tehran’s nuclear power program. Iran was expected to offer more transparency and agree to limitations on uranium enrichment in exchange for an eventual lifting of crippling economic sanctions imposed by the US and the EU.
BREAKING:
Iranian deputy minister of industries shot dead in Tehran - IRNA
10
November, 8.11 GMT
(Reuters)
- An unidentified attacker shot dead Iranian Deputy Industries
Minister Safdar Rahmatabadi in Tehran on Sunday night, the state news
agency IRNA reported.
Israel
boosts attack on Iran nuclear deal after ‘productive’ Geneva
talks
Israel is ramping up its effort to prevent a deal with Iran, which is seen as a serious threat to its national security. It comes after French intervention stalled high-level talks aimed at resolving the conflict over Iran’s nuclear program.
RT,
10
November, 2013
As
delegations from Iran and six leading nations were locked in
negotiations in Geneva, the government of Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu was continuing to advocate against dealing with
Tehran. Over the weekend, Netanyahu called British PM David Cameron
and German Chancellor Angela Merkel to promote Tel Aviv’s position,
he told his Cabinet on Sunday.
“I
told them that according to the information reaching Israel, the deal
that appears to be in the offing is bad and dangerous,” Netanyahu
said. “Not
just for us but also for them. I suggested that they wait and give it
serious consideration, and it’s good that that is indeed what was
decided. We will do everything we can to convince the leaders not to
reach a bad agreement.”
"I
asked them what was the rush? I suggested they wait," he
said in remarks relayed by his office.
Netanyahu
added that he spoke on the phone to French President Francois
Hollande on the Iranian talks. France took the lead in stalling
negotiations with
Iran this weekend, and the French leader is to visit Israel next
Sunday.
Netanyahu
himself is to visit Moscow on November 20 just as talks are to resume
in Geneva.
Israel
will also be able to voice its objections to a delegation of senior
US officials, led by Wendy Sherman, the U.S. Undersecretary of State
for political affairs, which is due to arrive in Jerusalem on Sunday.
The officials are to update Netanyahu’s government on the
developments in Geneva.
In
addition to lobbying President Obama’s administration, Israel is
planning a lobbying campaign aimed at the US Congress, Israeli
Economy Minister Naftali Bennett said Sunday.
"Before
the talks resume, we will lobby dozens of members of the US Congress
to whom I will personally explain during a visit beginning on Tuesday
that Israel's security is in jeopardy," he told Israeli
army radio.
Iran's President Hassan
Rouhani.(Reuters / Keith Bedford)
Iran was engaged in marathon talks with the P5+1 group of nations in Geneva this week, which it was hoped would produce an agreement on Tehran’s nuclear power program. Iran was expected to offer more transparency and agree to limitations on uranium enrichment in exchange for an eventual lifting of crippling economic sanctions imposed by the US and the EU.
Netanyahu’s
government has been extremely vocal in objecting to the Obama
administration’s rapprochement with Iran after the election of
Hassan Rouhani as the country’s new president. Apparently, stalling
tactics is what the Netanyahu government sees as a solution in the
situation.
"In
another two and a half years there will be someone else in the White
House, but we will still be here,"Israel's deputy Defense
Minister, Danny Danon, told public radio Sunday.
A
failure to strike a deal that would at least partially lift economic
sanctions against Iran may also undermine Rouhani’s power base at
home. The conservative section of the Iranian establishment is far
from approving his policy towards the US, and a lack of concrete
results in the talks may cost the Iranian president support.
The
possible recovery of Iran, a leading Shiite nation in the Middle
East, is also viewed with disdain by the Sunni monarchies such as
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. US Secretary of State John
Kerry will be flying to Abu Dhabi to meet his counterpart in the UAE,
Sheikh Abudllah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, and is expected to discuss the
Iran negotiations.
Israel
reportedly forged a shaky
alliance with
these usually strictly anti-Israel nations, as they are united in
their common goal to undermine
Iran.
Iran
nuclear deal in danger of unravelling
US
negotiator leaves talks to reassure Israeli prime minister after
France sinks bid to seal temporary agreement
Binyamin
Netanyahu, centre, and Israeli cabinet members meet at a kibbutz in
the Negev desert to express alarm about the Iran talks. Photograph:
Pool/Getty Images
10
November, 2013
The
diplomatic progress that brought six foreign ministers tantalisingly
close to a historic agreement on the Iranian nuclear programme is in
danger of unravelling before negotiators meet again this month,
officials and analysts warned on Sunday.
In
a bid to contain the danger, the lead US negotiator, Wendy Sherman,
flew straight from the talks in Geneva to Israel to reassure Binyamin
Netanyahu's government that the intended deal would not harm his
country's national interests.
The
hastily arranged trip represented an acknowledgement of Netanyahu's
power to block a deal through his influence in the US Congress and in
Europe. Egged on by the Israelis, the US Senate is poised to pass new
sanctions that threaten to derail the talks before they get to their
planned next round in 10 days' time.
The
US secretary of state, John Kerry, said on Sunday that America was
sufficiently sceptical of Iran's willingness to dismantle its nuclear
programme and would keep sanctions in place as talks continue.
"We
are not blind and I don't think we're stupid. We have a pretty strong
sense of how to measure whether or not we are acting in the interests
of our country and of the globe," Kerry said on NBC's Meet the
Press.
More
immediately, Netanyahu demonstrated over the weekend that he could
sway the Geneva talks from the inside through his relationship with
Paris. It has emerged that after a call from Barack Obama on Friday
evening asking him not to oppose the planned Geneva deal, Netanyahu
did the opposite. He called British prime minister, David Cameron,
Russian president Vladimir Putin, German chancellor Angela Merkel and
French president François Hollande, asking them to block it.
Hollande,
whose government shared some of Israel's concerns, agreed. It was
French opposition that finally sank the bid to seal a temporary
nuclear accord, after three days of intense bargaining, in the early
hours of Sunday morning, but Netanyahu was quick to claim credit.
Netanyahu
told cabinet colleagues: "I told them that according to the
information Israel has, the impending deal is bad and dangerous –
not just for us but for them too. I asked them what was the rush and
I suggested that they wait and consider the matter seriously.
"The
deal at once lifts the pressure of sanctions which have taken years
to put in place, and leaves Iran with its nuclear and enrichment
capabilities intact. Not one centrifuge is to be dismantled. These
are historic decisions. I asked that they wait and I'm pleased they
have decided [to do] so."
The
French roadblock took Washington by surprise. There had been an
initial day of discussions in Geneva on Thursday involving the
Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, the EU foreign policy
chief, Lady Ashton, and senior diplomats from the US, the UK, France,
Germany, Russia and China, the six-nation group known as the P5+1
that has led the nuclear negotiations since 2006.
There
had been an understanding that if the talks looked close to
agreement, Kerry, who was in the Middle East last week, would come to
Geneva to push them over the finishing line. But on Thursday night
the Iranians forced his hand. Zarif announced that work on drafting
an agreement would start the next morning and officials told the
press Kerry would fly in the same day – putting the US secretary of
state in a bind. If he stayed away and the talks failed, he would be
blamed. He was weighing the possibility of personal intervention
anyway, officials in Geneva said, but would have preferred to have
chosen the timing and made the announcement himself.
Kerry
had an uncomfortable meeting with Netanyahu at Ben Gurion airport on
Friday morning in which the Israeli prime minister lectured him on
the dangers of deal with Iran which loosened sanctions without
halting the nuclear project. The atmosphere was so sour, the
Americans opted out of a joint press appearance.
Kerry
took off for Geneva, but before he landed the draft agreement was
under public attack from another, more unexpected quarter. The French
foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, told a French radio station that
Paris would not accept a jeu des dupes – a fools' game, casting
doubt on when a deal could be concluded.
He
broke an agreement not to discuss the content of the negotiations in
public, outlining what France saw as the sticking points: Iran's
heavy-water reactor in Arak and its stock of medium-enriched uranium,
which are alternative pathways to making a bomb. The 20% uranium
could be easily turned into weapons-grade material if Tehran should
decide to make a warhead, but Iran was refusing to ship it out of the
country. The negotiators had been looking at compromises such as
diluting it or turning it into oxide reactor fuel, which would make
it more difficult to enrich further. But Paris was concerned that
such options did not give the same level of assurance that the
stockpile would not one day used for a bomb.
France's
unease about Arak was even greater. Once operational, the heavy water
reactor would produce plutonium with its spent fuel. It was due to be
completed next year, and Iran refused to halt production, saying it
was essential for producing isotopes used in medicine, agriculture
and other scientific research.
A
compromise was being hatched by US and Iranian officials that would
allow the Iranians to carry on building the reactor over the
six-month period of the interim agreement, but only to test it with
dummy fuel rods and ordinary water.
The
French and the Israelis believed that was too high-risk a solution
that would allow the Iranians to get so close to completion that they
would be able to insert enriched uranium into the reactor with very
little notice and present the world with a fait accompli. Once that
was done, bombing the reactor would not be an option because it would
send a radioactive plume across the region.
Kerry
had been hoping to address the French reservations within P5+1, but
Fabius refused to back down during a session of the foreign ministers
that went late into Saturday morning. Zarif observed wryly that the
P5+1 seemed to need more time to negotiate with each other than with
Iran.
Other
western officials were furious with what they saw as a French breach
of the P5+1's jealously guarded unity.
"This
is about France's interests in the Gulf and the fact that Hollande is
going to Israel later this month and he doesn't want the trip to turn
into a nightmare," one official said. French officials said the
text drafted principally by the US and Iran was significantly
different from the one discussed by the P5+1. "There are two
parallel processes going on here, a multilateral one that has been
going on for seven years, and a bilateral one, and the two have not
come together properly. The cogs have got jammed," said an
European official in Geneva.
France
has long suspected the Obama administration of being too ready to
make a deal with Iran for short-term diplomatic gains, but as
recently as a year ago a senior French official told the Guardian
that ultimately an agreement would have to be made between Washington
and Tehran. Paris, whatever its reservations, would not stand in its
way.
That
calculation clearly no longer applies. Following the two countries'
falling-out over Syria, in which the French believed the Obama
administration was dithering, France now feels strong enough to
oppose Washington on America's most pressing foreign policy issue –
a measure perhaps of America's waning influence in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.