We've crossed the most important line in the history of humanity and you'd be hard-pressed to find it even covered in most of the world's media. Perhaps too many crimes or road deaths to be reported?
Perhaps 350.org might consider a name change?
Perhaps 350.org might consider a name change?
Climate
hits 400ppm of CO2 for first time in 3 million years
10
May, 2013
It
is a sign of our rapidly changing world -- both technologically and
atmospherically -- that we can get daily updates on the rising levels
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere via Twitter. @Keeling_Curve
is the Twitter account of the Scripps
Institution of Oceanography
and tweets daily readings from the Mauna
Loa Observatory
in Hawaii, which has been measuring how much carbon dioxide is in the
air since 1958. In what is a symbolically significant milestone, on
May 9th NOAA reported CO2 levels of 400.03 parts per million (ppm),
which is a level
unseen for three million years.
This
milestone is, undoubtably, bad news. However, the newsworthiness of
this moment also serves as an opportunity to educate the public about
what this number means for the climate and our future.
What
does this number, 400 ppm, mean?
Prior
to the Industrial Revolution, natural climate variations caused
atmospheric CO2 to vary between about 200 ppm during ice ages and 300
ppm during the warmer periods between ice ages. At the dawn of the
Industrial Revolution, around the year 1780, the CO2 concentration
was about 280 ppm, so CO2 had already risen by around 40 ppm before
Keeling began his measurements. Anyone who has breathed air with less
than 300 ppm CO2 is now over 100 years old!
What
does 400 ppm look like?
Recent
estimates suggest CO2 levels reached as much as 415 parts per million
(ppm) during the Pliocene. With that came global average temperatures
that eventually reached 3 or 4 degrees C (5.4-7.2 degrees F) higher
than today’s and as much as 10 degrees C (18 degrees F) warmer at
the poles. Sea level ranged between five and 40 meters (16 to 131
feet) higher than today.
In
his great talk on why
climate change is simple,
David Roberts explained what scientists predict the world will look
like at various levels of warming. With warming of 2º Celsius now
appearing to be all but inevitable, Roberts focused on what we can
expect with warming of 4º C.
Watch
the full speech for more.
Here
are some reactions to the news.
For
the entire period of human civilization, roughly 8,000 years, the
carbon dioxide level was relatively stable near that upper bound. But
the burning of fossil fuels has caused a 41 percent increase in the
heat-trapping gas since the Industrial Revolution, a mere geological
instant, and scientists say the climate is beginning to react, though
they expect far larger changes in the future.
Damian
Carrington at The Guardian notes
that "the last time so much greenhouse gas was in the air was
several million years ago, when the Arctic was ice-free, savannah
spread across the Sahara desert and sea level was up to 40 metres
higher than today."
"We
are creating a prehistoric climate in which human societies will face
huge and potentially catastrophic risks," said Bob Ward, policy
director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change at the
London School of Economics. "Only by urgently reducing global
emissions will we be able to avoid the full consequences of turning
back the climate clock by 3 million years."
Remember,
once CO2 is released into the atmosphere, it stays there for around
500 years. For all intents and purposes, it is forever. That’s why,
over the long term, it is the atmospheric concentration of CO2
(which, by the way, is now hovering around 400 ppm) that will
determine the severity of climate change.
Bryan
Walsh at TIME
says the 400 ppm number isn't as worrisome as the rate of warming:
The
fact that we’re going to cross 400 ppm doesn’t mean that much by
itself. It’s not like the sound barrier—the difference in warming
between 399 ppm and 400 ppm would likely be minute. But the sheer
rate of increase over just the past 55 years shows how fast global
warming could hit us in the future—and the present—and
underscores how much we’ve failed as a planet to slow down carbon
emissions.
Brad
Plumer at Wonkblog
wonders about when the warming will slow:
Humanity
is all but certain to zoom past 400 parts per million. The big
question is, how far past?
For
a long time, many climate experts thought we should aim to stabilize
atmospheric carbon to about 450 parts per million. That goal looks
daunting now. At the current rate, the world will pass that mark
within a few decades. Indeed, even the most optimistic analyses of
current trends, like this one from the International Energy Agency,
which predicts that natural gas will displace coal, see us hitting at
least 650 parts per million without drastic changes.
Greg
Laden puts the milestone in perspective
to get ahead of a denier talking point:
So,
right now, CO2 should be at a short term peak. The range of this
variation is around 8 ppm, so if we hit, say, 401 ppm next week,
expect that value to go back below 400 ppm in a few weeks. In other
words, we can and should note that we are probably hitting the 400
ppm barrier, but then later when we drop slightly below, temporarily,
400ppm, the climate science denialists will be all over that claiming
that there is no global warming. Cuz they’re morons.
This
is a new era – in which humanity has the power to change the entire
climate of the planet so that it is more clogged with carbon than at
any time since homo sapiens took dominion. This is the mark of
dystopian science fiction – except that it’s real, and apparently
unstoppable. What right does one species have to change the world’s
climate so structurally it will destroy countless other life-forms?
350.org
has launched a slick new page -- http://400.350.org
-- about what 400 ppm means to the climate movement:
Bill
McKibben:
"We're
in new territory for human beings--it's been millions of years since
there's been this much carbon in the atmosphere. The only question
now is whether the relentless rise in carbon can be matched by a
relentless rise in the activism necessary to stop it."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.