Big
Earthquakes Create Global-Scale GPS Errors
Thirteen
years of supersized earthquakes, such as today's (May 24)
magnitude-8.3 in Russia, have contaminated GPS sites around the
world, a new study finds.
Deformation
from earthquakes bigger than magnitude 8.0 since 2000. The blue
squares are GPS reference sites, and the red arrows are deformation
from big earthquakes.
23
May, 2013
The
Global Positioning System is a network of satellites and ground
stations that provide location information anywhere on Earth. Except
for spots in Australia, western Europe and the eastern tip of Canada,
every GPS site on the ground underwent small but important shifts
since 2000 because of big earthquakes, according to a study published
May 6 in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.
The
research confirms that great earthquakes, those bigger than magnitude
8.0, can have far-reaching effects on the Earth's crust. And because
GPS is critical for everything from calculating satellite orbits to
sea level rise to earthquake hazards, scientists can't ignore these
tiny zigs and zags, the researchers conclude.
"We
have to find a way to deal with it," said Paul Tregoning, lead
study author and a geophysicist at Australia National University in
Canberra. "The community needs to work out how to find all the
offsets, estimate them accurately and get everyone to agree on how to
correct them," he told LiveScience.
Tregoning
and his colleagues modeled the sudden jolts in Earth's crust from
each of the 15 biggest earthquakes since 2000. They discovered that
crust thousands of miles away from the faults had moved horizontally
by as much as a tenth of an inch (a few millimeters). The model was
checked against a few spots around the planet. On average, the
earthquakes deformed the crust by a hundredth of an inch every year
(0.4 millimeters a year) — about the width of the lead in a
mechanical pencil. [7 Craziest Ways Japan's Earthquake Affected
Earth]
"It's
quite amazing to us that we can see this and detect this,"
Tregoning said.
These
tiny effects won't make a difference to the GPS in cars or phones, or
the tough little units carried by hikers and mountaineers. But
scientists who need precise measurements to calculate sea level rise
or satellite orbits should be concerned, Tregoning said.
The
changing Earth
Here's
why these seemingly small changes matter. Scientists who rely on GPS
need to compare one place to another. There are a handful of stable
spots around the world, usually in the interior of continents, called
the terrestrial reference frame. For example, a geologist measuring
the speed of the Pacific plate would compare it with the North
American reference frame. But Tregoning's study shows these stable
spots were shifted by the massive earthquakes.
Disturbing
the reference frame will introduce errors into GPS measurements,
Tregoning said. It could also throw off calculations of satellite
orbits. "If the coordinates of the tracking stations are wrong,
then the orbit isn't right either," he said.
"I
think he's identified a good problem," said Don Argus, a
principal research scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
in Pasadena, Calif., who was not involved in the study. Argus is part
of a group that uses GPS to calculate satellite orbits and conduct
research on the changing Earth.
"It's
difficult to find a stable frame with these post-seismic transients,"
Argus said. "The earthquakes are making things a little hard for
the people on our floor."
While
Argus and his colleagues already account for the deformation caused
by earthquakes, it takes computers at JPL 24 hours to churn through
the calculations, Argus said. "I've got the best plate motion
model out there," he told LiveScience.
Tregoning
hopes that the next update to the International Terrestrial Reference
Frame System, the internationally agreed upon reference for GPS
research, will consider the wide-ranging effects of big earthquakes.
"We
have to agree on how to improve the reference frame," he said.
"People doing regional studies will find that they potentially
get a different answer, and it will potentially be a more accurate
answer."
Editor's
note: This story was updated May 24 to include information about the
May 24 Okhotsk earthquake.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.