Is MI5 foiling terror plots of
its own hatching?
Nafeez
Ahmed
29
May, 2013
This
weekend I had a short, sharp piece published in the Independent
on Sunday (in
print and online at Indy Voices) which argued that the banned Al
Muhajiroun is still incubating terrorism on UK soil - but that the
group has had a very murky connection to Britain's security services,
and may still do so. Check it out here - 'Britain
should prosecute terrorism suspects, not play shady games of
geopolitics'.
Today, I'm elaborating on one dimension of that piece here in the wake of the stream of revelations concerning the role of MI5 in allegedly tracking/harassing the Woolwich attackers. This piece has more detail - on the evidence of Al Muhajiroun's unequivocal terror connections, and the credible evidence of its relationship to Britain's security services. It includes little known but credible choice info from an MI5 source and Bakri himself confirming the relationship:
Today, I'm elaborating on one dimension of that piece here in the wake of the stream of revelations concerning the role of MI5 in allegedly tracking/harassing the Woolwich attackers. This piece has more detail - on the evidence of Al Muhajiroun's unequivocal terror connections, and the credible evidence of its relationship to Britain's security services. It includes little known but credible choice info from an MI5 source and Bakri himself confirming the relationship:
Allegations
broadcast last night on BBC
Newsnight,
based on a letter
addressed to Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC),
claim that Woolwich suspect Michael "Mujahid" Adebolajo had
been tortured by Kenyan authorities "at the behest of British
intelligence."
The
allegations compound questions already raised about why MI5 failed to
prevent the horrifying attack despite both suspects having appeared
on MI5
and MI6 "intelligence
watch lists"; with Adebolajo himself having "featured
in several
counter-terrorist investigations"
for the "last eight years". Various reports suggest he had
been high
on MI5's priority for the last three years,
and even harassed to join up as an informant six months ago.
Defending
criticisms of MI5, ISC chairman Sir
Malcolm Rifkind told
the BBC that the security service's record in the last few years had
been "hugely impressive", as proven by the litany of plots
foiled and successful terrorism prosecutions.
But
the central role of the banned al-Qaeda linked group formerly known
as Al Muhajiroun in almost every major UK terror plot - including
Woolwich - demonstrates the murkiness of MI5's relationship with the
banned group.
One
in five terrorist convictions in
the UK for more than a decade were for people who were either members
of or had links to Al Muhajiroun. Choudary himself
admitted to knowing Adebolajo as someone who "attended our
meetings and my lectures." Adebolajo was a regular at Al
Muhajiroun's Woolwich high street dawah (propagation)
stall, was "tutored" by Al-Muhajiroun founding chair Syrian
cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed himself, and had attended the group's
meetings between
2005 and 2011.
Despite
proscription, Al Muhajiroun has continued to function with impunity
in new incarnations, most recently under the banner of Izhar
Ud-Deen-il-Haq -
run under the tutelage of British-born Anjem Choudary.
Al
Muhajiroun's intelligence connections started in 1996 when Omar Bakri
founded the group. According to John
Loftus,
a former US Army Intelligence Officer and Justice Department
prosecutor, three senior Al Muhajiroun figures at the time - Bakri,
Abu Hamza, and Haroon Rashid Aswat - had been recruited by MI6 that
year to facilitate Islamist
activities in the Balkans.
The objective was geopolitical expansion - destabilising former
Soviet republics, sidelining Russia and paving the way for
the Trans-Balkan
oil pipeline protected
by incoming NATO 'peacekeeping' bases.
On
10th February 1998, Bakri and Choudary issued a "fatwa"
declaring "a full scale war of Jihad" on the US, Britain,
and "non-Muslim governments... which will be the responsibility
of every Muslim around the world to participate in."
In
2000, Bakri admitted to training British Muslims to learn "firearms
and explosives use, surveillance and other skills" and "would
be expected to join a jihad" abroad. He also boasted: "The
British government knows who we are. MI5
has interrogated us many times. I think now we have something called
public immunity.
There is nothing left. You can label us ... put us behind bars, but
it's not going to work."
In
the summer preceding 9/11, the FBI flagged up the unusual
presence of Al Muhajiroun activists at
Arizona flight schools, many with terror connections, including one
described as a close bin Laden associate.
Labour
Party MP Andrew
Dismore told
Parliament about a month after 9/11 that Bakri's private security
firm, Sakina
Security Services,
sends hundreds of Britons "overseas for jihad training with live
arms and ammunition", including to camps in Pakistan and
Afghanistan. Though Sakina was raided by police and shut down, Bakri
and Hamza were not even arrested, let alone charged or prosecuted.
In
2003, two Al Muhajiroun members carried out a suicide
bombing in
Tel Aviv. Lead 7/7 bomber Mohamed Sidique Khan, an Al Muhajiroun
member who had been friends
with the Tel Aviv bombers,
had even travelled
to Israel weeks
before that attack. Khan later underwent explosives training in a
camp set up by Al
Muhajiroun's British and American members in
Pakistan.
A
year before 7/7, Bakri warned of a "well-organised group"
linked to al-Qaeda "on the verge of launching a
big operation"
against London. Months before the attacks, Bakri told
his followers in
internet lectures: "I believe the whole
of Britain has
become Dar
al-Harb (land
of war). The kuffar [non-believer] has no sanctity for their own
life or property." Muslims are "obliged" to "join
the jihad... wherever you are", and suicide bombings are
permitted because "Al-Qaeda... have the emir."
But
around the same time, the Wall Street Journal's Pulitizer Prize
winning journalist Ron
Suskind was
told by an MI5 official that the cleric:
"had helped MI5 on several of its investigations."
Bakri
confirmed the same in an interview with Suskind years later from
Tripoli, Lebanon, where he now resides. As Suskind wrote in his
book, The
Way of the World:
"Bakri enjoyed his notoriety and was willing to pay for it with information he passed to the police... It's a fabric of subtle interlocking needs: the [British authorities] need be in a backchannel conversation with someone working the steam valve of Muslim anger; Bakri needs health insurance."
Bakri
maintains regular
contact with
his British followers from Lebanon. Why would MI5 and MI6 retain the
services of someone so dangerous given the overwhelming evidence of
his centrality to violent radicalisation? Is MI5, through Al
Muhajiroun, hatching many of the plots it lays claim to successfully
foiling - as the FBI
has been doing in
the US?
It
is the ISC's job to find out whether this strategy has repeatedly
backfired - the committee must ask MI5 probing questions not simply
about pre-Woolwich intelligence "defects",
but about the security service's longstanding relationship with the
extremist network incubating terror on UK soil.
Dr.
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is
an international security expert who writes for The Guardian at
his Earth
Insight blog.
The author of The
London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry (2006).
His work was used by the Coroner's Inquiry into 7/7 and the 9/11
Commission.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.