Forget
the economy, forget even Peak Oil. This should be the headline.
Without bees we can't feed ourselves.
One-Third
of U.S.
Honeybee Colonies
Died Last Winter,
Threatening Food
Supply
Nearly one in three commercial honeybee colonies in the United States died or disappeared last winter, an unsustainable decline that threatens the nation’s food supply.
8
May, 2013
.
Multiple
factors — pesticides, fungicides, parasites, viruses and
malnutrition — are believed to cause the losses, which
were officially
announced today by
a consortium of academic researchers, beekeepers and Department of
Agriculture scientists.
“We’re
getting closer and closer to the point where we don’t have enough
bees in this country to meet pollination demands,” said
entomologist Dennis vanEngelstorp of the University of Maryland, who
led the survey documenting the declines.
Beekeepers
lost 31 percent of their colonies in late 2012 and early 2013,
roughly double what’s considered acceptable attrition through
natural causes. The losses are in keeping with rates documented since
2006, when beekeeper concerns prompted the first nationwide survey of
honeybee health. Hopes raised by drop in rates of loss to 22 percent
in 2011-2012 were wiped out by the new numbers.
The
honeybee shortage nearly came to a head in March in California, when
there were barely
enough bees to
pollinate the almond crop.
Had
the weather not been ideal, the almonds would have gone unpollinated
— a taste, as it were, of a future in which honeybee problems are
not solved.
“If
we want to grow fruits and nuts and berries, this is important,”
said vanEngelstorp. “One
in every three bites [of
food consumed in the U.S.] is directly or indirectly pollinated by
bees.”
Scientists
have raced to explain the losses, which fall into different
categories. Some result from what’s called colony collapse
disorder, a malady first reported in 2006 in which honeybees abandon
their hives and vanish. Colony collapse disorder, or CCD,
subsequently became a public shorthand for describing bee calamities.
Most
losses reported in the latest survey, however, don’t actually fit
the CCD profile. And though CCD is largely undocumented in western
Europe, honeybee losses there have also been dramatic. In fact, CCD
seems to be declining, even as total losses mount. The honeybees are
simply dying.
“Even
if CCD went away, we’d still have tremendous losses,” said
entomologist Diana Cox-Foster at Pennsylvania State University. “CCD
losses are like the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The system
has many other issues.”
Studying
these issues isn’t easy. In real-world agricultural settings, it’s
hard to run the rigorous, every-last-variable-controlled experiments
on which definitive conclusions are founded. These experiments can be
run in labs and small-scale test fields, but whether those accurately
reflect real-world complexity is debated.
Amidst
the uncertainties, scientific attention has settled
on a group of culprits,
the most high-profile of which is a class of pesticides known as
neonicotinoids. These were developed in the 1990s, rushed to market
with minimal studies of potential harms, and subsequently became the
world’s most-used pesticides.
In
the last several years, it’s become evident that neonicotinoids are
extremely toxic to honeybees and, even in small, sub-lethal doses,
make bees more vulnerable to disease. The European Union
recentlylimited
neonicotinoid use,
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing their use.
Pesticide
companies have fought the restrictions, arguing that neonicotinoids
are unfairly blamed. Most non-industry scientists say the question
isn’t whether neonicotinoids are a problem, but where they fit into
a constellation of problems.
“Different
studies indicate that this class of pesticide is rather harmful to
the bees,” said honeybee pathologist Cédric Alaux of the French
National Institute for Agricultural Research, who said the E.U.’s
restrictions are sensible. “However, we should not be too naive and
think that it will solve the bee problem.”
Just
as important as neonicotinoids, and perhaps more so, are Varroa
destructor mites.
First detected in the United States in 1987, the mites weaken bees by
sucking their hemolyph, the insect analogue of blood, and also
transmit viruses and other parasites. A recent USDA report
called Varroa “the
single most detrimental pest of honey bees.”
The
report also noted that neonicotinoid exposure alters
immune system function in Varroa-infected
bees and makes
bees more vulnerable to infection by Nosema
ceranae,
another parasite implicated in honeybee losses. It’s possible that
neonicotinoids used on crops don’t usually kill bees outright, but
weaken them enough for other stresses to become lethal.
Agricultural
entomologist Christian Krupke of Purdue University likened the
effects to “living in an area with extreme levels of smog, causing
your body and immune system to become overtaxed so that a common
cold progresses to pneumonia.”
Krupke
noted that although neonicotinoids are the most common poisonous
chemicals in honeybee environments, they’re far from the only
chemicals. Cox-Foster and vanEngelstorp stressed that point,
referencing research that found 121
different pesticides in honeybee hives.
On average, each hive contained traces of 6 pesticides, and sometimes
several dozen.
Research
on pesticide interactions is in its infancy, but combinations
may be extremely harmful to
bees, amplifying what the chemicals would do alone. “I worry that
the neonicotinoid attention is distracting from the other pesticides
that have clear effects, and might even have stronger effects. Things
like fungicides are completely unregulated for bees,” said
van Engelstorp. “I think we need to keep the pesticide investigation
broader.”
Another,
less-appreciated aspect of honeybee life also gained attention in the
winter survey and new USDA report: what they eat. Though commercial
bees are trucked on pollination circuits around the United States,
most beekeepers have home bases in the upper Midwest, an area that’s
undergone significant changes in recent years.
Rising
food prices led farmers to plant crops in fields previously
considered marginal or set aside as grasslands. Honeybees forage in
those grasslands, and can’t get the nutrition they need from
flowering crops alone.
Add
the record-setting drought of summer 2012, and bees were hard-pressed
for nourishment. Malnourishment could in turn make bees more
vulnerable to pests and infections, or exacerbate the effects of
pesticides.
“The
drought, the possible combination of factors that went with it, was
clearly a big problem for a lot of beekeepers,” vanEngelstorp said.
“In some cases, it was a combination of Varroa and
these malnourished, pesticide-exposed bees.”
Commercial
bees pollinate
dozens of crops,
and though colonies can be replaced, continuing losses could soon
render beekeeping economically unviable. Researchers are trying to
breed more resilient bees, but the combination of
chemicals, nutrition and disease will likely prove insurmountable by
genetic improvements alone, said Cox-Foster.
She
said native pollinator habitat needs to be left intact or
re-established; a field that goes unplanted, or a roadside left
unmowed, can be thought of as insurance
against commercial honeybee loss.
Dennis van Engelstorp recommended that, as a rule of thumb, 10 percent
of land mass should be managed as pollinator havens.
Pesticides
can also be used more carefully. Rather than being applied broadly,
across entire fields and locales, they can be precisely
targeted to outbreaks.
Other unnecessary uses can be averted.
“Many
entomologists and pest management professionals have been saying for
years that there is no pest management justification for using these
insecticides on virtually every crop grown in North America,” said
Krupke. “Yet, the opposite trend is occurring.”
The
honeybee catastrophe could also signal problems in other pollinator
species, such as bumblebees and butterflies, that are not often
studied.
“Thinking
of honeybees as our canary in the coal mine, a monitor for
environmental conditions, is very appropriate,” Cox-Foster said.
“With honeybee colonies, you have the ability to open them up and
see what’s going on. There are many other species needed for
pollination, but with most of those, we don’t have the ability to
see what’s happening.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.