Posts
Reflections
on the past few days
Here
is the ‘new-look CAMS, which makes everything look "OK". This is FRAUD.
Via Facebook
I
have been reflecting on some of what has been said, and what has not
been said over the last few days about CAMS (Copernicus) and methane
levels.
I
am sorry to say that, having spent some time looking at data
with Margo I
can say that some of the words being written flow from the pen too
quickly and do not, unfortunately, always coincide with the truth.
Sam
Carana, whom I admire greatly and have always taken at face value has
written some things in comments that I would be hard-pressed to
put my fingers in but which I can remember clearly.
It
was, more-or-less a criticism of CAMS. He stated that CAMS does not
provide data (and it is true it does not give raw, numerical data)
but ONLY PROVIDES FORECASTS.
This
is simply not true as anyone who wants to check will find out.
It
usually has several (representing 3 or 4 days) based on ACTUAL data.
The rest is from a FORECAST PERIOD.
He
also said that it underestimated amounts of methane in the
atmosphere.
That
is really weird because I could never have come to my conclusions
about a rapid increase in methane emissions over a short period of
time without it. It was the colour schemes and the fact that we had
records (the data disappears quickly and there is no archives- this,
along with the absense of numerical data is is a weakness for sure.
Obviously
I am still upset from Paul Beckwith's videos on this and it is all
looking a bit like sour grapes from people who like the information
to come from 'authorities'.
In
my view, some of these 'authorities' have been caught with their
pants down by a couple of rank amateurs who noticed stuff that eluded
others.
No
one has been able to prove that we are wrong but choose to ignore
what we have done.
My
original piece on this is here:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.