More
indications of Trump’s battle with the Deep State
As
I Predicted, Trump's Generals Resist
Trump's
furious Situation Room row with his top general is LEAKED: Chairman
of joint chiefs reprimanded him on Syria - so president demanded
immediate pull-out- Trump held a summit in his White House situation room this week on how to get out of Syria - and in an astonishing breach, it has leaked
- President opened the meeting with a tirade about U.S. intervention in Syria and asked what it had gotten for the money and American lives
- He said 'nothing' repeatedly but Associated Press says intensity of Trump's tone and demeanor 'raised eyebrows and unease among the top brass'
- Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, Marine General Joseph Dunford reprimanded Trump saying his approach was 'not productive'
- Trump hit back by demanding immediate withdrawal of all U.S. forces and end to aid efforts and had to be talked down by defense secretary Mattis
- At a separate meeting he watched CIA footage of a terrorist being killed and demanded to know why his family wasn't taken out too
7
April, 2018
President
Donald Trump is facing an astonishing leak of a confrontation in the
Situation Room with his most senior military commander and another
leak of talks with the CIA.
He
and Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, clashed over what to do about Syria in the White House's most
secret and guarded area.
Five
officials brief the Associated Press on that happened as Gen Dunford
told him his approach was 'unproductive' and demanded that he issue
'specific instructions' on how to proceed.
And
the Washington Post detailed how Trump demanded of its head of drone
operations - an official whose name is a secret - why operators had
waited until a terrorist had left his family's home before killing
him.
The
two leaks will serve to increase tensions in Washington over Syria.
Trump
on Tuesday said 'I want to get out. I want to bring our troops back
home,' and later that day held the meeting in the situation room.
Trump's
desire for a rapid withdrawal faced unanimous opposition from the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Pentagon, the State Department and the
intelligence community, all of which argued that keeping the 2,000
U.S. soldiers currently in Syria is key to ensuring the Islamic State
does not reconstitute itself.
But
as they huddled in the Situation Room, the president was vocal and
vehement in insisting that the withdrawal be completed quickly if not
immediately, according to five administration officials briefed on
Tuesday's White House meeting of Trump and his top aides.
The
officials weren't authorized to discuss internal deliberations and
requested anonymity.
If
those aides failed in obtaining their desired outcome, it may have
been because a strategy that's worked in the past - giving Trump an
offer he can't refuse - appears to have backfired.
Rather
than offer Trump a menu of pullout plans, with varying timelines and
options for withdrawing step-by-step, the team sought to frame it as
a binary choice: Stay in Syria to ensure the Islamic State can't
regroup, or pull out completely.
Documents
presented to the president included several pages of possibilities
for staying in, but only a brief description of an option for full
withdrawal that emphasized significant risks and downsides, including
the likelihood that Iran and Russia would take advantage of a U.S.
vacuum.
Ultimately,
Trump chose that option anyway.
The
president had opened the meeting with a tirade about U.S.
intervention in Syria and the Middle East more broadly, repeating
lines from public speeches in which he's denounced previous
administrations for 'wasting' $7 trillion in the region over the past
17 years.
What
has the U.S. gotten for the money and American lives expended in
Syria? 'Nothing,' Trump said over and over, according to the
officials.
The
intensity of Trump's tone and demeanor raised eyebrows and unease
among the top brass gathered to hash out a Syria plan with Trump,
officials said: Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff; Defense Secretary James Mattis, CIA chief Mike Pompeo and
acting Secretary of State John Sullivan.
Aftermath:
Raqqa, which as ISIS's de facto capital, is one of the areas of Syria
where new infrastructure will be needed. Trump suggested ending all
U.S. efforts to build it in the Situation Room argument
At
one point, Dunford spoke up, one official said, telling Trump that
his approach was not productive and asked him to give the group
specific instructions as to what he wanted.
Trump's
response was to demand an immediate withdrawal of all American troops
and an end to all U.S. civilian stabilization programs designed to
restore basic infrastructure to war-shattered Syrian communities.
Mattis
countered, arguing that an immediate withdrawal could be catastrophic
and was logistically impossible to pull off in any responsible way,
without risking the return of the Islamic State and other terrorist
groups in newly liberated territories, the officials said. Mattis
floated a one-year withdrawal as an alternative.
Trump
then relented - but only slightly, telling his aides they could have
five or six months to complete the mission to destroy the Islamic
State and then get out, according to the officials.
Trump
also indicated that he did not want to hear in October that the
military had been unable to fully defeat the Islamic State and had to
remain in Syria for longer.
The
president had spoken. But what to say about it publicly?
In
a brief and vague statement released Wednesday, the White House said
the U.S. role in Syria is coming to a 'rapid end' and emphasized that
the U.S. was counting on other countries and the U.N. to deal with
Syria's future.
But
it offered no specificity as to the timing of a U.S. withdrawal.
'The
president has actually been very good in not giving us a specific
timeline,' Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, director of the Joint Staff,
said Thursday. 'We've always thought that as we reach finale against
ISIS in Syria, we're going to adjust the level of our presence there.
So in that sense, nothing has actually changed.'
Mattis
said Friday that the military is talking with Kurdish partners and
others in Syria to resolve questions over US support once the United
States eventually withdraws from the war-torn country.
'We
are in consultation with our allies and partners right now, so we'll
work all this out,' Mattis said when asked whether the US military is
committed to supporting Syria's Kurdish fighters.
Pentagon
officials stressed that no formal order had been handed down to the
military to alter course or start a withdrawal. Nonetheless, the
officials said Trump was clear in his intent.
For
Trump, any notion of a 'timeline' comes with significant political
risk.
After
all, he had regularly bashed Obama on the campaign trail for
forecasting his military moves in advance.
In
fact, Trump was so critical of Obama for putting an arbitrary
deadline on the 2011 Iraq withdrawal that he dubbed Obama 'the
founder of ISIS,' arguing that Obama had signaled to al-Qaeda
sympathizers in Iraq that they need only wait the U.S. out.
The
leak of the Situation Room showdown was matched by another leak of
top-secret activity - this time talks with the CIA operative in
charge of its drone strikes om his very first day in office.
The
Washington Post revealed how Trump met three agency officials when he
visited CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and was shown a feed
from Syria, where Obama had limited CIA drones to surveillance
flights.
He
ordered them to arm CIA drones there and said, according to two
former officials who spoke to the Washington Post: 'If you can do it
in ten days, get it done.'
Then
he was shown a video of a previous strike in which a terrorist was
killed after leaving his family home and responded by saying: 'Why
did you wait?'
Trump
has been infuriated by leaks throughout his presidency and demanded
action against leakers repeatedly.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.