Just because you ignore a problem for a while it doesn't go away!!
Will Fukushima Daiichi Kill Vast Swathes of Life in the Pacific Ocean?
Will Fukushima Daiichi Kill Vast Swathes of Life in the Pacific Ocean?
11
Janury, 2014
(Hat
tip: The argument outlined here was suggested in a careful assemblage
of Enenews headlines, particularly this one:
Radiation
jumps around Fukushima plant — Now ~1,000% previous levels —
Tepco kept strontium-90 data secret for months — Officials knew of
increase but ‘too busy’ to do anything — Gov’t holds Friday
meeting about what can be done. I've made the argument
explicit using additional data.)
The
nuclear village is prepped for the propaganda war.
Nuclear
scientists are lined up ready with their research to minimize the
impact. Even non-biased scientists may grossly underestimate
Fukushima contamination by relying on flawed models.
We
see this concerted trivialization of potential Fukushima effects at
online sites such as Deep Sea News, which has recently committed to
“combat misinformation about the presence of high levels of
Fukushima radiation…” with articles such as:
These
articles attempt to debunk radiation as a cause by logic rather than
empirical data. What are missing from the Deep Sea analyses are
actual empirical measurements of radiation levels. Lack of empirical
data calls into question Deep Sea’s conclusions.
Scientists
predicting ocean contamination from Fukushima based on samples taken
in 2011 and 2012 may be grossly under-estimating the volume of total
releases occurring across time.
For
example, one study estimated total releases of strontium based
samples analyzed in 2012. So, the samples were either taken in 2011
or 2012.
N.
Casacuberta, P. Masqu´e, J. Garcia-Orellana, R. Garcia-Tenorio,
and K. O. Buesseler (2013) 90Sr and 89Sr in seawater off Japan
as consequence of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident
Biogeosciences Discuss., 10,
2039–2067
Here
we calculated the release of 90Sr by using the 90Sr/137Cs ratio data
obtained from the analyzed samples (Buesseler et al., 2012), once
corrected for background concentrations (1.2 and 2.5 Bqm−3 for 90Sr
and 137Cs, respectively) (IAEA, 2005) (Fig. 7).
This
study does not anticipate a sharp increase in the volume of strontium
released by Fukushima Daiichi across time in its estimates of total
releases, although it does acknowledge direct discharges of cooling
water into the ocean:
Thus,
the inventory of 90Sr Fukushima-derived in the oceans from 19±6 to
265±74 Bqm−3, respectively. While the occurrence of 89Sr is an
evident signal of Fukushima-derived releases, the activities of 90Sr
measured in some stations reached values two orders of magnitude
higher than the background levels reported in this area (i.e. 1.2
Bqm−3). The 90Sr/137Cs ratio has been calculated to be 0.0265±5
0.0006 (in May–June 2011) although it may have varied, especially
after a significant leakage of contaminated waters that occurred in
December 2011. This ratio is unique and significantly different than
that of the global atmospheric fallout produced by nuclear weapon
tests, which was 0.63 and it may be used in future studies to track
waters coming from Fukushima. Results of the samples analyzed here
evidenced a much 10 stronger influence of direct discharges of
cooling water into the sea and the oceanic background concentration,
rather than atmospheric deposition. Direct discharges have been
quantified on the basis of the estimates of 137Cs discharges and the
90Sr/137Cs ratio, resulting in a range between 90 and 900 TBq of
90Sr.
This
study’s results for total releases will not be valid if strontium
contamination increases exponentially.
It
appears that strontium contamination is increasing exponentially.
Radiation levels in fresh and sea water sampling have been rising
steadily since the summer of 2013:
Record
radiation levels detected in well at Fukushima nuke plant Dec
14 2013, The Asahi Shimbun,
A
record 1.8 million becquerels of beta-ray sources per liter of water
were detected at a monitoring well at the crippled Fukushima No. 1
nuclear power plant, operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Dec.
13. The reading concerns strontium and other beta-ray
sources. The water was sampled at a monitoring well in an area
close to the sea near the No. 2 reactor building on Dec. 12. The well
is located close to trenches holding highly radioactive water. TEPCO
said the reading apparently spiked after highly radioactive water
seeped into the surroundings through failed parts of the trenches
Fukushima
Diary analyzed TEPCO’s December 2013 data and reported
unprecedented levels of strontium:
1,900,000,000
Bq/m3 of all β nuclide on seaside of reactor2 / Keeps
increasing for a month. Posted by Mochizuki on December 23rd,
2013 http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/1900000000-bqm3-of-all-%CE%B2-nuclide-in-groundwater-on-seaside-of-reactor2-keeps-increasing-for-a-month/
Significantly
high level of all β nuclide (including Strontium-90) is detected in
groundwater on the seaside of reactor2, and it’s breaking the
highest records every time Tepco analyzes. This is the
groundwater sampled from one of the borings between reactor2 and the
sea. From Tepco’s
own data, the density has been increasing at least since 11/25/2013.
The latest reading
is 1,900,000,000 Bq/m3,
which is measured on 12/19/2013. This is approx. as double as the one
of 11/25/2013.
Majia
here: Ok so strontium levels in the ground water and in ocean samples
have been spiking massively. That is why TEPCO has been withholding
readings:
TEPCO
withheld Fukushima radioactive water measurements for 6 months (2014,
January 9) The Asahi Shimbun
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201401090060
Tokyo
Electric Power Co. has withheld 140 measurements of radioactive
strontium levels taken in groundwater and the port of the Fukushima
No. 1 nuclear plant between June and November last year. TEPCO
has been releasing the combined levels of all radioactive substances,
including strontium, that emit beta rays, at the crippled nuclear
plant. But strontium levels exceeded the all-beta readings in some
instances, leading the utility to decide they were “wrong” and to
withhold them from public releases, TEPCO officials said Jan.
8. Previously, TEPCO officials said they had not released the
data because the numbers were not confirmed.
Majia
here: So, from these rising contamination levels we can conclude that
the published research studies predicting total strontium
contamination of the ocean are going to grossly under-estimate actual
total contamination.
What
we need is a model that predicts trends in strontium contamination
under the conditions found at the Daiichi site.
First,
what conditions are found at Daiichi? TEPCO admitted in May of 2011
that core melt-throughs had occurred at the Daiichi site. Melted fuel
has breached containment and is in direct contact with water at the
site.
The
Daiichi site is very, very wet because it was built on the site of an
old river bed, which was diverted for construction. The river has
returned to its historical course under the Daiichi site.
This
explains why site liquefaction is occurring at the Daiichi site. So,
we need a model of strontium contamination based on a water-logged
melt-through scenario.
Enenews
reported on a German study that roughly uses these parameters,
although the German model was less water-saturated
Study
finds giant strontium-90 release into body of water begins around
1,000 days after reactor meltdown — 1,000 days after 3/11 =
December 2013 — Graphic shows very high levels discharged for tens
of thousands of days
http://enenews.com/study-finds-giant-strontium-90-release-into-body-of-water-begins-around-1000-days-after-meltdown-dec-5-2013-is-a-thousand-days-after-311-graphic-shows-very-high-levels-being-discharged-for-u
The
German simulation found that strontium-90 levels in ground water
would likely spike dramatically 1,000 days after a meltdown. The
study was published in the 1990s but has relevance for Fukushima’s
melt-throughs. I read the article and this passage stood out:
The
highest radionuclide concentration of approx. 10 to the tenth power
Bq/m3 is reached by Sr-90 after 5000 days. The effective equivalent
dose for an adult is above 10 the second power Sv/a.
After
a prolonged period of about 10,000 days, Cs-137 reaches a maximum of
about 10 to the eight power Bq/m3. The effective equivalent dose for
this radioncuclide is approximately 1 sv/a.
A.
Bayer, W. Tromm, & I. Al-Omari. Dispersion of Radionuclides and
Radiation Exposure After Leaching by Groundwater of a Solidified
Core-Concrete Melt. http://www.irpa.net/irpa8/cdrom/VOL.1/M1_97.PDF
Majia
here: This study may lend insight into TEPCO data on spiking
strontium contamination.
The
study’s model best fits the data on spiking contamination levels,
providing more conceptual and empirical evidence that at least one of
the units at Fukushima Daiichi experienced full melt-through, known
in popular jargon as ‘China Syndrome.’The Pacific Ocean is going
to be hammered with Strontium-90 for years and years.
The
Enenews article noted that Ken Buesseler expressed concerns
about bioacccumulation of
strontium: http://enenews.com/study-finds-giant-strontium-90-release-into-body-of-water-begins-around-1000-days-after-meltdown-dec-5-2013-is-a-thousand-days-after-311-graphic-shows-very-high-levels-being-discharged-for-u
Majia
here: Hideo Yamazaki, a marine biologist at Kinki University,
believes the site will continue to contaminate the ocean for years
until massive structural repairs are made: ‘The current levels of
contamination in the fish and seafood from the Fukushima coast will
continue for a while, perhaps more than 10 years, judging from the
progress in the cleanup process’. [i]
Marine
animals at the top of the food chain and birds that feed on marine
life will become highly contaminated under these conditions.
Bioaccumulation and biomagnification are inevitable and I believe
they will be devastating to Pacific life.
Bioaccumulation
of cesium has been studied more widely than strontium because the
former is easier to detect. In August of 2012, Jiji Press reported
that ‘25,800 Becquerels of Cesium Detected in Fish Caught off
Fukushima.’[ii]
In March 2013, a fish measuring 740,000 Bq/kg was caught off of
Fukushima.[iii]
In April 2012 the Japanese media reported: ‘Cesium up to 100 times
levels before disaster found in plankton far off nuke plant.’[iv]
More
recently:
Fish
with very high levels of cesium found near Fukushima January 11, 2014
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201401110029
A
fish contaminated with extremely high levels of radiation was found
in waters near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant…The
Fisheries Research Agency said Jan. 10 the black sea bream had 12,400
becquerels per kilogram of radioactive cesium, 124 times the safety
standards for foodstuffs. The fish was caught at the mouth of the
Niidagawa river in Iwaki, Fukushima Prefecture, on Nov. 17. The site
is 37 kilometers south of the stricken power plant….The research
institute said it will study the fish further to try and determine
when it became contaminated with such high levels of radioactive
cesium.
Strontium
contamination is ultimately going to be far more concentrated than
cesium contamination. However, unless scientists go out and actually
sample sea life across time they will not be able to predict
cumulative strontium contamination levels.
Unfortunately,
strontium is more difficult to test for than cesium. Scientists might
well test only for cesium and then excluded all radionuclides as
causing undiagnosed disease syndromes in sardines and starfish, for
example, based on strontium-cesium ratios predicted in research
studies such as the one examined above by Casacuberta, et al (2013).
Strontium
is very nasty biologically. I recommend reading these two posts by
Optimal Prediction and Nuke Pro (who is anti-nuke):
Strontium,
the Bogeyman exists, a Wicked One Two Punch
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2013/03/strontium-bogeyman-exists-wicked-one.html
One
of the unpleasant things I learned about strontium is that can enter
the brain’s calcium-ion channels and be stored there as an analogue
of calcium. Imagine having radionuclides decaying inside your brain’s
neural networks. Read about it here
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/living-in-radiation-contaminated-zone.html
Bioaccumulation
and biomagnification are typically much faster in the ocean than on
land. However, we too will bio-accumulate strontium, as well as other
radioisotopes across time and we will transmit damage to our children
via our radiation-mutated germ line cells.
We
will breath strontium in the air and consume it in our food,
particularly in seafood but no doubt in other food sources that tend
to be high in calcium.
Strontium
will continue to be dispersed atmospherically directly at the plant
in the form of radioactive steam releases and the strontium in the
ocean will be cycled through evaporation and bio-magnification. It is
indeed likely that Fukushima contamination will kill great swathes of
life in the Pacific, particularly because that life was already
stressed by ocean contamination, acidification, and declining food
stocks. Fukushima contamination is, I argue, a likely global tipping
point.
NOTES
[i]
‘Cesium Levels in Fish off Fukushima Not dropping’ (26
October 2012), The
Asahi Shimbun,
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201210260047,
date accessed 27 October 2012.
[ii]
‘25,800 Becquerels of Cesium Detected in Fish Caught Off Fukushima’
(21 August 2012),
Jiji Press,
http://jen.jiji.com/jc/eng?g=eco&k=2012082100864, date accessed
22 August 2012. See also ‘Radiation 258 Times Legal Limit Found in
Fish off Fukushima’ (22 August 2012), The
Asahi Shimbun,
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201208220077,
date accessed 23 August 2012.
[iii]
‘TEPCO (15 March 2013), Jiji,
http://jen.jiji.com/jc/eng?g=eco&k=2013031501020, date accessed
17 March 2013.
[iv]
‘Cesium up to 100 Times Levels Before Disaster Found in Plankton
Far off Nuke Plant’ (3 April 2012), The
Mainichi,
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120403p2a00m0na009000c.html,
date accessed 3 April 2012.
RESOURCES
Introduction
to Majia's Blog and Index
of
Posts Herehttp://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/break-from-bloging.html
Rising
Radiation Levels
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/smoke-at-daiichi-viewed-from-glass-box.html
Last
Days (in Japan) http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/last-days.html
October
2013 Interview with James Fetzer about my book, Fukushima
and the Privatization of Risk (Palgrave,
2013)
Sep
7, 2013 Voice of
Russia http://voicerussia.com/2013_09_07/Fukushima-not-under-control-6308/
July
23 2013 Voice of
Russiahttp://voicerussia.com/radio_broadcast/70924886/118436060.html
PowerPoint
of data examining reports of conditions at the plant and evidence of
criticalities, which can be seen
here http://www.academia.edu/4314657/Fukushima_Update_Aug_2013 or
herehttps://www.dropbox.com/s/11xz1zjgwcsbpo0/Fukushima%20Update%20Aug%202013.pptx
GENETICS,
HUMAN HEALTH AND RADIATION
Burdening
the species with genetic mutations:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/burdening-species-with-genetic.html
Mutations
and Germ Line Mosaicism:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/mutations-germ-line-mosaicism.html
Somatic
or genetic effects?
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/somatic-or-genetic-effects.html
Ionizing
radiation and germ line cell damage:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/ionizing-radiation-and-germ-cell-damage.html
Children
and Radiation
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/children-and-ionizing-radiation.html
Autism
and radiation
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/08/autism-and-radiation.html
Studying
autism and radiation:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/autism-and-environment-lets-study.html
How
to Bias Studies on Radiation:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/how-to-bias-studies-on-biological.html
Radiation
dose history:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/estimating-dose-and-history-of.html
Run
when you hear no immediate danger:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/run-when-you-hear-no-immediate-danger.html
Sociopaths
run world and nuclear energy:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/sociopaths-run-world-and-nuclear-energy.html
Internal
emitters:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/on-internal-emitters.html
Ambiguities
of dose
modelshttp://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/environmental-health-perspectives.html
Plant
in Environmental Health
Perspectives http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/plant-in-environmental-health.html
Plant
Erupts into a Poison
Fruithttp://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/plant-erupts-into-poison-fruit-dont-be.html
Science
Corrupted by Private
Funding?http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/science-corrupted-by-private-funding.html
Enenews
headlines
10:03
AM EST on May 16th, 2014 | 205
comments
‘Mystery
disease’ on Pacific coast of Alaska — Livers ‘crumble’…
Hearts enlarged, pale… Yellow lymph nodes… Blood-filled lungs
(PHOTOS) — Professor: Worrying there’s no answers, big public
health concern — Testing carcasses for Fukushima radioactivity
(AUDIO)
03:14
PM EST on May 15th, 2014 | 120
comments
New
study reveals deaths and mutations ”increased sharply’ from
exposure to Fukushima contamination, “especially at low doses” —
‘Small’ levels of cesium may be ‘significantly toxic’ —
Smithsonian: “In other words, things don’t look good for the
animals living around Fukushima”
12:47
PM EST on May 14th, 2014 | 353
comments
CNN:
“Problem from hell at Fukushima” — Tons of ‘highly
radioactive’ liquid pouring out of Reactor 2 each day —
Mysterious explosive bang “deep inside” — 3 areas at bottom may
be ruptured — Caroline Kennedy at Plant: US will help with the
leaks; 21 y/o son 3-hr Tepco tour (VIDEO)
09:33
PM EST on May 13th, 2014 | 93
comments
Former
official posts pics of bloody tissues after daily nosebleed: “You
can no longer live in Fukushima”… many suffer due to radiation —
Fukushima U. Prof.: Impossible to make it so people can live here —
Top Govt Spokesman: Nosebleeds & nuclear disaster NOT related
(PHOTOS)
03:28
PM EST on May 13th, 2014 | 185
comments
Medical
Expert: Hundreds ill after Fukushima nuclear plant rubble burned in
major Japanese city — Suffering nosebleeds, problems with eyes,
throats and skin — Gov’t: Radiation levels were ‘low enough’
to be safe (PHOTO)
08:06
PM EST on May 12th, 2014 | 119
comments
HBO:
‘Genetic passports’ for major population exposed to nuclear
radiation? “It has deformed their genes, sorry it’s a bit of a
bummer” — Twins attached by organs growing outside body, ’1-eyed
cyclops’, babies with giant heads… “they respond to the people
around them” (GRAPHIC PHOTOS & VIDEO)
10:54
AM EST on May 12th, 2014 | 152
comments
‘Bizarre
creature’ turned 50 miles of California coast into graveyard in
summer 2011 — Gov’t Biologist: Die-off like this never seen here
— “Abalone massacre… carcasses of urchins, starfish, other
mollusks” — Experts find “alterations in 30 genes, some unknown
to science” — “Suddenly proliferating… killing wildlife”
(PHOTO)
01:25
AM EST on May 12th, 2014 | 136
comments
VICE:
Japan mother may be jailed for “tweet critical of nuclear lobbyist”
— Fukushima police travel 1,000 miles to interrogate her, examine
computer — Officer: We only go outside prefecture for “potentially
dangerous criminal” — “May be held without bail… without
right to see lawyer”
04:10
PM EST on May 11th, 2014 | 72
comments
Press Conference by Former Official: I’m bleeding from nose every day, many in Fukushima have similar symptoms — Author: My nose bled for days, it wouldn’t stop; Staff had same problem… Do people want me to lie? I can only write truth — Gov’t: The nosebleeds aren’t caused by nuclear crisis (PHOTO)
How a Single Tweet Could Land a Japanese Nuclear Activist in Jail
VICE,
12
May, 2014
In
2012, more than 15,000 people living near the crippled Fukushima
nuclear power plant filed a
criminal complaint at
the Fukushima prosecutors’ office. They alleged that Tokyo Electric
Power Company (TEPCO) and the Japanese central government were
criminally negligent for the March 2011 Fukushima meltdown and the
way in which the resulting cleanup was handled.
The
Fukushima police, however, declined to investigate. And prosecutors
quietly dropped all charges against TEPCO, arguing that it was too
difficult to prove criminal negligence even
though several third-party watchdogs found that TEPCO and government
officials had failed to carry out measures necessary to prevent the
disaster despite knowing that a devastating earthquake could
potentially strike near the plant. Even an independent investigative
commission set up by the Japanese National Diet had concluded,
"The meltdown was a manmade disaster."
Meanwhile,
Fukushima police and prosecutors have set their sites on a
47-year-old single mother named Mari Takenouchi because she wrote a
tweet critical of a nuclear lobbyist. Takenouchi may go to jail for
it.
*
* *
Fukushima
police and prosecutors are currently investigating Takenouchi for
criminal contempt; if found guilty, she could face a month in jail.
Prosecutors confirmed they will be flying to Okinawa, where
Takenouchi lives, to question her on May 13. Police have already
traveled from Fukushima to Okinawa to interrogate her — an unusual
occurrence.
“We
only send police officers from one prefecture to another if the
subject is really a potentially dangerous criminal,” Fukushima
police spokesman Lieutenant Tadashi Terashima told VICE News.
Takenouchi,
the potentially dangerous criminal in question, is a journalist and
blogger who fled her hometown of Tokyo with her infant son days after
the disaster, hoping to avoid fallout from Fukushima. (She was too
late; radiation had already reached Tokyo.) Today, she reports on the
health of children in Fukushima. This is the translation of the tweet
that has authorities flying across the country to interrogate her:
世紀の罪人2人に共通項→日本に原発導入した中曽根康弘「2011年の日本がこんなにくたびれているとは思わなかった。」福島で人体実験エートスを主催する(御用)市民活動家、安東量子「戦後67年かけて辿り着いたのが、こんな世界とかや。」ー長崎の日にて
The
translation:
There's
a common point between the 2 criminals of the century. Yasuhiro
Nakasone, who introduced nuclear plants in Japan, said: "I
didn't expect Japan in 2011 to become such a battered country."
Ryoko Ando, a (pro-establishment) citizen activist who hosts Ethos'
human experiments in Fukushima, said: "Is this the kind of world
we've arrived at over the 67 years since the end of World Ward Two?"
Written on Nagasaki Day."
Nakasone
was an influential Japanese politician for much of the second half of
the 20th century — he served as Prime Minister in the 1980s — who
championed Japan's exploration of nuclear power in the 1950s. Ando is
the Japanese head of Fukushima
Ethos,
a project led by French NGO the Center of Studies on the Evaluation
of Protection in the Nuclear Field (CEPN) and funded by the French
nuclear energy lobby. Fukushima Ethos encourages residents to
continue living in contaminated areas as long as decontamination
procedures and radiation measurements continue to be done. "Human
experiments," in Takenouchi's opinion.
“Ryoko
Ando blocked me on Twitter and rejected my offer to engage in an open
debate with a mediator," Takenouchi told VICE News, "and
instead filed a criminal accusation against me."
*
* *
After
the tweet appeared, Ando reported it to the Fukushima Prefectural
Police, accusing Takenouchi of either criminal defamation or criminal
contempt. This past January 29, Takenouchi received a telephone call
from Fukushima police, notifying her that Ando had filed a complaint
against her. Two weeks later, Takenouchi said police came to her
apartment in Okinawa and examined her computer.
She
was also asked to attend an interrogation at the Naha City police
station. During the interrogation, Fukushima police asked her about
her background as a reporter, her career as an anti-nuclear activist,
and why she used the words “human experiment" in the tweet.
'If
all debates about nuclear energy in this country are going to become
grounds for criminal investigations, freedom of speech will vanish.'
So
far, Takenouchi's legal fees have totaled about $5,000, which she's
been paying with the help of donations.
“I'm affected by this accusation to the point that I cannot sleep
at night, but I would like to keep fighting for protecting our
freedom of speech and for protecting the health of the children of
Fukushima,” she said.
Ando,
meanwhile, acknowledged to VICE News that she'd filed the complaint,
but despite repeated requests to clarify her position and the
position of Fukushima Ethos, she said she would not comment on the
investigation until it's concluded.
The
charge of criminal contempt is very different from a charge of libel
in the US. Takaaki Hattori, a Japanese legal expert and co-author
of Modern Media and The Law, says the charge is
inappropriate. "It's unprecedented for the police to launch a
contempt investigation against a journalist for a single tweet, made
in the public interest," he said. "If all debates about
nuclear energy in this country are going to become grounds for
criminal investigations, freedom of speech will vanish. The fact that
police even sent the case to the prosecution is disturbing."
Still,
this isn’t the first time those with ties to the nuclear industry
have used the law in an attempt to silence criticism in Japan. In
2012, the president of nuclear power safety company New Tech
brought a
$600,000 lawsuit against
investigative journalist Minoru Tanaka, who exposed links between the
Japanese mafia, politicians, and the Japanese nuclear industry.
The
prosecutor’s office will decide by July whether to indict
Takenouchi. If they go ahead with the case, she may be held without
bail until her trial, as is often the case in Japan, without a right
to see a lawyer or have one present during questioning. Police told
VICE News they would not comment on the case "due to privacy
matters."
* *
*
The
investigation of Takenouchi is an unusual but not unique example of
an ever-increasing crackdown on freedom of the press in Japan.
Earlier this year, Reporters Without Bordersissued
a statement condemning
"the censorship and self-censorship that continues to prevail in
discussion of nuclear energy in Japan three years after the disaster…
[and] the treatment of independent journalists and bloggers who are
critical of the government and the nuclear energy lobby."
In
Reporters Without Borders' press freedom rankings for 2013, Japan
fell to a
new low of 59th place,
due in part to the Special Secrets Act passed in the middle of the
night in December, and “the ban imposed by the authorities on
independent coverage of any topic related directly or indirectly to
the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.” Amid
these discouraging trends, Takenouchi waits to learn her fate.
“We
are still considering whether to prosecute or not," a
prosecutor's office
spokesperson
said. "We’re not aware of past cases in which tweets were
found to be the basis for criminal contempt, but the law is the law."
Follow
Nathalie-Kyoko Stucky on Twitter: @NathalieStucky
Jake
Adelstein contributed
additional reporting to this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.