Obama
Prepares to Wage Offensive, First-strike Strategic Nuclear Warfare
against Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and Syria
By
Francis A. Boyle
24
June, 2013
I
have now had the chance to read Obama’s recently released Report on
Nuclear
Employment Strategy of the United States,
(June 21, 2013). The critical passage can be found on page 5:
“The 2010 Nuclear
Posture Review established the Administration’s goal to set
conditions that would allow the United States to safely adopt a
policy of making deterrence of nuclear attack the sole purpose of
U.S. nuclear weapons. Although we cannot adopt such a policy
today, the new guidance re-iterates the intention to work towards
that goal over time.”
In
other words, “nuclear deterrence” is not now and has not been the
policy of the Obama administration going back to and including their
2010 Nuclear Posture Review as well.
Since
“nuclear deterrence” is not now and has never been the Obama
administration’s nuclear weapons policy from the get-go, then
by default this means that offensive first-strike strategic
nuclear war fighting is now and has always been the Obama
administration’s nuclear weapons policy.
This
policy will also be pursued and augmented by means of “integrated
non-nuclear strike options.” (Ibid).
Therefore
the entire 2013 NPR and Obama’s recent nuclear arms “reduction”
proposals must be understood within this context of the United
States pursuing an offensive, strategic first-strike nuclear
war-fighting capability as augmented by non-nuclear strike forces:
“After
a comprehensive review of our nuclear forces, the President has
determined that we can ensure the security of the United States and
our Allies and partners and maintain a strong and credible strategic
deterrent while safely pursuing a one-third reduction in deployed
nuclear weapons from the level established in the New
START Treaty.” Id. at 6.
And
we know now for sure that all the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)
systems that Obama is currently in the process of deploying in
Europe, Asia, and the United States, on land, at sea and
perhaps in Outer Space are designed to provide the United States with
a strategic, offensive, first strike nuclear war fighting
capability against Russia and China and Iran and North Korea and
Syria for starters. The latter three because the United States
has taken the position that they are not in compliance with their
obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: “…the
United States has relied increasingly on non-nuclear elements to
strengthen regional security architectures, including a forward U.S.
conventional presence and effective theater ballistic missile
defenses…” Id. at 9.
So
the United States government is currently preparing to
launch, wage and win an offensive, first-strike strategic
nuclear war against Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and Syria.
All
the rest is just palaver. Including by our Dissembler-in-Chief. An
“honors” graduate of Harvard Law School.
Professor
Francis A. Boyle,
Author, The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence (Clarity Press:
2002)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.