Alberta’s
Oil Sands Raise Flaring Emissions as Rules Lag
18
June, 2013
In
the farming country of northwest Alberta, heavy oil wells are
becoming more common than cattle and combines. Along with money and
jobs, the boom has brought smells and fumes that are adding to the
greenhouse gas emissions from Canada’s oil sands.
Emissions
from flaring, or burning of natural gas, methane and hydrogen
sulphide associated with oil production, have risen in each of the
last three years as drillers increased activity and the government
failed to implement new industry targets.
“There’s
no new absolute target to reduce flare or vent emissions,” said
James Vaughan, who works at the Alberta Energy Conservation Board’s
surveillance branch, in an interview. “The economics for conserving
gas just doesn’t seem to be there” because of a decline in
natural gas prices.
Flaring
by companies including Husky Energy Inc. (HSE) is rising even as the
Canadian government touts the country’s efforts to limit emissions
to win support for TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL pipeline.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper met his European counterparts last week
in Paris and London, appealing for them to stop EU plans to single
out Alberta as a source of high-polluting energy.
Environmental
groups such as 350.org and the Sierra Club have lobbied President
Barack Obama to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry
crude from Alberta to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, saying that
oil-sands production has a larger climate-change impact. Globally,
about 5.3 trillion cubic feet of gas is flared annually, the
equivalent of 25 percent of U.S. consumption of the fuel, according
to the World Bank.
Surging
Production
With
bitumen production expected to surge to 6.7 million barrels a day by
2030, flaring and venting will continue to rise without new
regulations, said Chris Severson-Baker, managing director of the
Pembina Institute, a Calgary-based environmental research group and
consultancy.
Flaring
and vented gas from crude oil and bitumen production increased 66
percent between 2009 and 2011, the most recent figures available,
according to ERCB data. The upward trend continued last year,
according to preliminary data from the regulator.
Previous
declines from 1996 to 2009 resulted from the implementation of
recommendations from an alliance of non-governmental groups,
industry, the public and government, known as the Clean Air Strategic
Alliance, helping Alberta achieve the most “comprehensive”
enforcement rules to manage flaring globally, according to a 2004
World Bank report.
Negative
Impacts
Emissions
from flaring in Nigeria have “negative impacts” on lung function,
according to a report in the Research Journal of Environmental Earth
Sciences published on March 8, 2012. Inhaling vapors associated with
heavy-oil production may result in nose and throat irritation,
headaches and nausea, Baytex Energy Corp. (BTE), a Calgary-based
producer, said on its website.
A
2005 report by the Environmental Rights Action and Climate Justice
determined gas flaring in Nigeria’s Bayelsa State likely causes 49
premature deaths and respiratory illnesses in 5,000 children
annually.
Alberta,
home to Canada’s oil and gas industry, relies on companies to
determine whether capturing, burning or releasing gas, known as
venting, is “economically viable,” said the ERCB’s Vaughn. A
combination of measures, including a previous emissions target for
the industry, allowed Alberta regulators to slash flaring emissions
by 80 percent between 1996 and 2009.
Progress
Imperiled
That
progress is at risk without stiffer regulations and targets, said
Severson-Baker.
“We
knew because of industry trends that flaring and venting was likely
to start climbing upwards,” he said in an interview. “When it
came right down to it, industry wasn’t able to spend more money on
flaring and venting abatement and the government wasn’t prepared to
push any further.”
Canadian
Natural Resources Ltd. (CNQ) was responsible for the largest volume
of flared and vented gas in the province in 2011, followed by Husky,
according to regulatory data. Smaller companies including Manitok
Energy Inc. (MEI) flared more gas as a proportion of their
production.
Massimo
Geremia, chief executive officer of Manitok, didn’t respond to a
request for comment. Husky spokeswoman Kim Guttormson declined to
comment. Canadian Natural Resources declined to comment.
Alberta’s
energy regulator is tabling new rules, expected by the end of the
year. An increase in operators drilling oil wells with small volumes
of associated gas, which is difficult and expensive to capture, has
also contributed to the rising flaring and carbon dioxide emissions,
said Vaughn.
Open
Wounds
“We
are looking at expanding the test to look at other parameters to take
into account something outside of economics,” he said. “When the
public comes to us and asks why isn’t this facility conserving and
we go back to them and say the economics aren’t there, that’s a
hard pill for the public to swallow.”
Those
issues have surfaced in the Peace River district in an area called
Three Creeks. For Thera Breau, the increased heavy oil production and
flaring has coincided with open wounds and eye problems for her four
sons, all under the age of seven.
“My
baby had a red spot behind his knee and by the end of March the
blotch spread to the other leg,” Breau, a 36 year-old
physiotherapist, said in an interview. “All the gas is free-vented
and free-flared. The regulations are lagging.”
Leaving
Home
Breau
is among half a dozen families who have left their homes in the Peace
River area to get away from the fumes and bad smells, she said.
Neighbors Marcel and Vivianne Laliberte in October left their farm
where family members have grown grains since 1928 after suffering
from bleeding noses, headaches and swollen glands.
“It’s
a heart-breaking situation,” said Vivianne Laliberte, in a phone
interview. “Proper monitoring is not being done and people’s
concerns are being disregarded.”
Baytex
voluntarily halted its drilling program in the area near Three Creeks
about a year ago and added equipment to capture gas and a pipeline
system to use or sell about 1 million cubic feet of gas daily that
would have previously been vented, said Brian Ector, a Baytex
spokesman.
“We’ve
put a lot of time and effort into reducing the amount of venting and
reducing the emissions and reducing the odors up at Peace River,”
he said.
Baytex
captured almost 95 percent of the gas produced during oil extraction
at its operations across Alberta, better than the industry average,
according to ERCB data from 2011.
“We
have always been fully compliant with the ERCB regulations, but we
want to go above and beyond that,” Ector said.
North
Dakota
Alberta
isn’t the only jurisdiction in North America wrestling with rising
flaring and venting emissions.
Oil
production in North Dakota has tripled since 2010 to 718,790 barrels
a day in March and companies are flaring about 30 percent of the
associated gases, said Ryan Salmon, director of the oil & gas
program at Ceres, a network of investors that promotes sustainability
through the adoption of environmentally friendly business practices.
“You
can’t underestimate how much is going up in flames-- $1 million a
day alone in North Dakota,” he said. “Reluctance on the part of
companies comes down to near-term economics of getting infrastructure
in place. You need to have both voluntary actions and regulation.”
Ceres represents investors with $11 trillion worth of assets.
Oil
producers can reduce flaring by connecting the produced gas to
pipelines and selling or using the gas. If that’s not economic or
practical, the “next best” option is to make sure the waste gas
is combusted at the well site using high-efficiency gas incineration
equipment to destroy volatile organic chemicals, said Audrey
Mascarenhas, chief executive officer of Calgary-based Questor
Technology Inc. (QST), which manufacturers gas-incineration
equipment.
“Many
will see the waste gas as still being combusted, however, when
combusted at high efficiency the waste gases are being reduced to
benign elements,” she said. “That is not happening now.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.