It’s Time To Discuss The Secret CIA Operation At The Heart Of The Benghazi Scandal
MICHAEL
KELLEY, GEOFFREY INGERSOLL
The CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya
18
May, 2013
In
eight months since an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi left
four Americans dead, aRepublican-led
investigation has
focused on potential missteps by the White House — and come away
with nothing
significant.
There
has been little attention given, however, to covert actions by the
Central Intelligence Agency that were partially uncovered during the
September 11, 2012 attack.
That
may be changing.
CNN’s
Jake Tapper argued this week that
we should give more scrutiny to the CIA’s presence in the Libyan
port city.
Congressman
Frank Wolf (R-Virg.) said the same, according to CNN: “There are
questions that must be asked of the CIA and this must be done in a
public way.”
Among
the topics we should be asking about are whether CIA missteps
contributed to the security failure in Benghazi and, more
importantly, whether the Agency’s Benghazi operation had anything
to do with reported heavy weapons shipments from the
local port to
Syrian rebels.
In
short, the CIA is the most intriguing about Benghazi. Here’s
what we know:
The
attack
At about 9:40 p.m. local time on Sept. 11, a mob of Libyans attacked a building housing U.S. State Department personnel. At 10:20 p.m. Americans arrived from a CIA annex, located 1.2 miles away, and at 11:15 p.m. they fled with survivors to the secret outpost.
Armed
Libyans followed
them and
attacked the annex with rockets and small arms from around midnight
to 1:00 a.m., when there was a lull in the fighting.
Glen
Doherty, a former Navy Seal commando and CIA security contractor, was
with a team ofJoint
Special Operations Command military operators and
CIA agents in Tripoli at the time of the attack. When they received
word of the assault on the mission, Doherty and six others bribed
the pilots of small jet with $30,000 cash for
a ride to Benghazi.
At
about 5:15 a.m., right after Doherty’s group arrived, the
attackers began shooting mortars at the annex, leading to the death
of Doherty and fellow former Navy SEAL commando and CIA contractor
Tyrone Woods.
At
6 a.m. Libyan forces from the military intelligence service arrived
and subsequently took more than 30 Americans — only
seven of
which were from the State Department — to the Benghazi airport.
So
the CIA’s response to go to the annex saved American lives, but it
also ended up exposing their covert presence.
And
according to Paula Broadwell, the mistress of David Petraeus when he
was CIA director, the CIA may have provided
an impetus for the attack by holding
prisoners at
the annex: “Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the
CIA annex had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner
and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try
to get these prisoners back.”
‘At
its heart a CIA operation’
In
November the Wall Street Journal reported that
the U.S. mission in Benghazi “was at its heart a CIA operation.”
In
January former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Congress that
the CIA was leading a “concerted effort to try to track down and
find and recover … MANPADS [man-portable air defence systems]”
looted from
the stockpiles of
toppled Libyan ruler Muammar Qaddafi.
The
State Department “consulate” served as diplomatic cover for the
previously hidden annex.
The
top-secret presence and location of the CIA outpost was first
acknowledged by
Charlene Lamb, a top official in the State Department’s Bureau of
Diplomatic Security, during Congressional testimony in October.
Representatives
Jason Chaffetz and Darrell Issa immediately
called a point of order when
Lamb showed a map locating the annex, and asked for the revelation to
be stricken from the record.
“I
totally object to the use of that photo,” Chaffetz. said. “I was
told specifically while I was in Libya I could not and should not
ever talk about what you’re showing here today.”
Weapons
from Benghazi to Syria
Also
in October we
reported the connection between
Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who died in the attack, and a
reported September shipment of SA-7 surface-to-air
anti-craft missiles (i.e. MANPADS) and rocket-propelled grenades from
Benghazi to Syria through southern Turkey.
That
400-ton shipment — “the largest consignment of weapons” yet for
Syrian rebels — wasorganised by
Abdelhakim Belhadj, who was the newly appointed head of the Tripoli
Military Council.
In
March 2011 Stevens, the official
U.S. liaison to
the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan
rebels, worked directly with Belhadj while he headed the Libyan
Islamic Fighting Group.
Stevens’
last meeting on Sept. 11 was with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait
Akin, and a
source told Fox News that
Stevens was in Benghazi “to negotiate a weapons transfer in an
effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based
extremists.”
Syrian
rebels subsequently began shooting
down Syrian
helicopters and fighter jets with
SA-7sakin
to those in Qaddafi’s looted stock. (The interim Libyan government
also sent money andfighters to
Syria.)
What
did the CIA know?
Collectively
these details raised the question of what the CIA knew, given that
Agency operatives in Libya were rounding up SA-7s, ostensibly
to destroy
them, while
operatives in southern Turkey were funelling
weapons to the rebels.
Ambassador
Stevens certainly would have known if the new Libyan government was
sending 400 tons of heavy weapons to Turkey from
Benghazi’s port.
Just
like the CIA would know if those the weapons arrived in Turkey and
began showing up in Syria.
Journalist
Damien Spleeters created
this sourced map,
drawing info shared on social media such as YouTube, that gives an
idea of the MANPADS presence in Syria.
We’ve
added red tag noting the Turkish port, Iskenderun, where the massive
SA-7 shipment docked. And this
map of
nearby Turkish highways shows that the heavy weapons could have been
transported from the port to the Syrian city of Aleppo in three
hours.
Other
intriguing details
This week Nancy Youssef of McClatchy reported that Ambassador Stevens reportedly twice turned down offers for additional security, despite specifically asking for more men in cables to the State Department.
Earlier
this month Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kent.) told
CNN:
“I’ve actually always suspected that, although I have no
evidence, that maybe we were facilitating arms leaving Libya going
through Turkey into Syria. … Were they trying to obscure that there
was an arms operation going on at the CIA annex? I’m not sure
exactly what was going on, but I think questions ought to be asked
and answered.”
So
now that all of the Benghazi emails have been published, and the
State Department’s role during and after the attack have been
probed ad nauseam, it’s time for someone to explain what the covert
CIA operation in Benghazi was all about.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.