Russian special forces repel a US-planned attack in Syria, denounce the USA and issue a stark warning
21
September, 2017
Something
rather unprecedented just happened in Syria: US backed “good
terrorist” forces attempted a surprise attack against Syrian
government forces stationed to the north and northeast of the city of
Hama. What makes this attack unique is that it took place
inside a so-called “de-escalation zone” and that it appears that
one of the key goals of the attack was to encircle in a
pincer-movement and subsequently capture a platoon of Russian
military police officers deployed to monitor and enforce the special
status of this zone. The Russian military police forces,
composed mainly of soldiers from the Caucasus region, fought against
a much larger enemy force and had to call for assistance. For
the first time, at least officially, Russian special operations
forces were deployed to rescue and extract their comrades. At
the same time, the Russians sent in a number of close air support
aircraft who reportedly killed several hundred “good” terrorists
and beat back the attack (Russian
sources speak
of the destruction of 850 fighters, 11 tanks, three infantry fighting
vehicles, 46 armed pickup trucks, five mortars, 20 freighter trucks
and 38 ammo supply points; you can see photos of the destroyed
personnel and equipment here).
What also makes this event unique is the official reaction of the
Russians to this event.
Head
of the Main Operations Department at Russia’s General Staff Colonel
General Sergei Rudskoi declared that:
“Despite agreements signed in Astana on September 15, gunmen of Jabhat al-Nusra and joining them units that don’t want to comply with the cessation of hostilities terms, launched a large-scale offensive against positions of government troops north and northeast of Hama in Idlib de-escalation zone from 8 am on September 19 (…) According to available data, the offensive was initiated by American intelligence services to stop a successful advance of government troops east of Deir ez-Zor“.
Today,
other Russian officials have added a not-so-veiled threat to this
accusation. The Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman, Major
General Igor Konashenkov has declared that:
Russia unequivocally told the commanders of US forces in Al Udeid Airbase (Qatar) that it will not tolerate any shelling from the areas where the SDF are stationed (…) Fire from positions in regions [controlled by the SDF] will be suppressed by all means necessary.
This
is unprecedented on many levels. First, the Russians clearly
believe that this attempt to kill or capture a platoon of the Russian
military police was planned by the United States. The fact that
they are making this accusation officially shows the degree of
irritation felt by the Russians about the duplicity of the
Americans. Second, this is the first time, at least to my
knowledge, that Russian Spetsnaz forces had to be sent in to rescue a
surrounded Russian subunit. All Spetsnaz operators survived,
but three of them were wounded in the operation (the Russians are not
saying how badly). The close air support by very low flying
SU-25 aircraft was obviously coordinated by Spetsnaz forward air
controllers and probably saved the day. In other words, this
was a close call and things could have ended much more badly (just
imagine what the Takfiri crazies would have done, on video, to any
captured Russian serviceman!). Finally, a US-organized attack
on what was supposed to be a “de-confliction” zone combined with
an attempt to capture Russian soldiers raises the bar for American
duplicity to a totally new level.
The
big question now is “do the Russians mean it?” or are they just
whining with real determination to hit back if needed.
There
are a couple of problems here. First, objectively, the Russian
contingent in Syria is a tiny one if compared to the immense power of
CENTCOM, NATO and the ever-present Israelis. Not only that, but
in any US-Russian confrontation, Russia as a country is objectively
the weaker side by any measure except a full-out nuclear exchange.
So the Russians are not in a position of force. Furthermore,
for historical and cultural reasons, Russians are much more concerned
by the initiation of any incident which could lead to all-out war
than the Americans who always fight their wars in somebody else’s
country. This might seem paradoxical, but the Russians fear war but
they are ready for it. In contrast to the Russians, the
Americans don’t fear war, but neither are they ready for it.
In practical terms this means that an American miscalculation could
very well lead to a Russian military response which would stun the
Americans and force them to enter an escalatory spiral which nobody
would control.
Remember
how Hillary promised that she would unilaterally impose a so-called
“no-fly” zone over Syria? She promised not only to deploy
US aircraft above Russian forces in Syria, but she also promised that
she would force the Russian Aerospace forces out of the Syrian
skies. Thank God, this crazy witch was not elected, but it
appears that folks with the same arrogant and,frankly, completely
irresponsible point of view are now back in power under Trump.
My
fear now is that the incompetent, arrogant, not too bright and
generally ignorant commanders at the Pentagon and the CIA will simply
ignore clear warning signs coming from the Russians, including the
public announcement that the Kremlin has given the authority to use
force to protect Russian personnel to the local Russian commanders in
Syria. In plain English, this means that if they are attacked
the Russians in Syria do not need to consult with Moscow before using
force to protect themselves. By the way, such rules of
engagement are pretty common, there is nothing earth shattering here,
but the fact that they were made public is, again, a message to the
AngloZionist and the “good” terrorist they use to try to conquer
Syria.
This
time around we (the world) were lucky. The Syrians fought hard
and the “good” terrorists were probably surprised by the ruthless
determination of the Russian military police forces (in reality,
mostly Chechen special forces) and of the Spetsnaz operators.
It is one thing to fight Syrian conscripts, quite another to deal
with these hardened warriors. But the next time around the
outcome could be different.
The
bigger picture is also one which gives me a great deal of concern.
The Syrians, with Iranian, Hezbollah and Russian help, have freed
Deir ez-Zor and have crossed the Euphrates river and are moving
further East. In plain English this means that the US and Daesh
have lost the war and that the last region of Syrian from which the
AngloZionists can hope to partition the country (their current “plan
B”) and establish a permanent US military presence is now
threatened by the Syrian advance. The distance between the US
forces currently deployed in northeastern Syria and Syrian, Iranian,
Hezbollah and Russian forces is becoming shorter and shorter each
day. I can just imagine how, say, Iranian or Hezbollah forces
which are already “smelling” the nearby presence of US forces are
drooling with hunger for the moment they will finally be able to get
their hands on their old and most hated foe. I feel sincerely
sorry for the first US unit to make contact with the Iranians or
Hezbollah forces.
Right
now the Americans are hiding behind the Kurds, but sooner or later
the Iranians or Hezbollah will find them. As for the Kurds,
their situation in Syria is precarious, to put it mildly: they are
surrounded on all sides by the Turks, the Syrians and the Iranians
and their only more or less stable zone of control is in Iraq.
The Americans understand that perfectly, hence their desperate
attempts to stop the Syrians.
This
is a very dangerous situation: even though CENTCOM and NATO are by
far the “biggest guys on the block”, in Syria the Americans are
cornered, their corner is shrinking fast and it remains entirely
unclear how this process can be stopped. Hence the attack on
the de-confliction zone we just witnessed.
I
hope that eventually the Americans will do what they did in al-Taif
and simply pack, declare victory and leave. That would be the
only rational thing to do. But after listening to Trump at the
UN I don’t get the feeling that being rational is at the top of the
US priority list. That’s all rather frightening.
The
Saker
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.