I
suspect that, given the timing, that this may be as much political as
anything else
S&P
says downgraded China as credit growth still too fast
21
September, 2017
BEIJING
(Reuters) - China’s attempts to reduce risks from its rapid buildup
in debt are not working as quickly as expected and credit growth is
still too fast, S&P Global Ratings said on Friday, a day after it
downgraded the country’s sovereign credit rating.
While
S&P warned months ago that a cut may be on the cards, it said it
decided to make the call after concluding that China’s “de-risking”
drive that started early this year was having less of an impact on
credit growth than initially expected.
“Despite
the fact that the government has shown greater resolve to implement
the deleveraging policy, we continue to see overall credit in the
corporate sector to stay at a 9 percent point”, Kim Eng Tan, an S&P
senior director of sovereign ratings, said in a conference call to
discuss the one-notch downgrade to A+ from AA-.
“We’ve
now come to the conclusion that while we do expect some deleveraging
in the next few years, this deleveraging is likely to be much more
gradual than we thought could have been the case early this year.”
Tan
said broader lending by all financial institutions, excluding equity
fund-raising, has started to rise after growing by a relatively
steady 12-13 percent in the last few years.
“That
was the key metric that we look at...and we believe while this growth
of aggregate debt financing could come down somewhat over the next
few years, it’s not likely to come down very sharply.”
Indeed,
China’s new bank lending and total social financing (TSF), a broad
measure of credit and liquidity in the economy, look set to hit
record highs again this year.
China’s
banks extended a record 12.65 trillion yuan ($1.84 trillion) of loans
in 2016, roughly the size of Italy’s economy. TSF was a record 17.8
trillion yuan ($2.70 trillion).
“One
of the things that we do look for is more than just stabilization of
financial risks, but actual decline or moderation in financial
risks,” Tan said.
f
China’s credit-to-income growth falls sharply in coming years and
the economy remains healthy, S&P would consider a ratings
upgrade, he added.
Hong
Kong stocks were on track for their worst day in a month and China
shares hit three-week lows early on Friday, as investors reacted to
S&P’s downgrade and North Korea’s threat of another nuclear
test.[.SS][.HK]
The
yuan CNY=CFXS was little changed, with some big state banks seen
trying to stabilize it in early trade.[CNY/] China's debt market are
not expected to be impacted much as it is dominated by domestic
investors, though foreign interest has been on the rise.
POINTED
MESSAGE OR BAD TIMING?
S&P’s
move put its rating in line with those of Moody’s and Fitch, though
the timing raised eyebrows as it came just weeks ahead of one of the
country’s most politically sensitive events, the twice-a-decade
Communist Party Congress (CPC).
China’s
finance ministry said on Friday the downgrade was “a wrong
decision” that ignored the economic fundamentals and development
potential of the world’s second-largest economy.
“China
is able to maintain the stability of its financial systems through
cautious lending, improved government supervision and credit risk
controls,” the Ministry of Finance said in a statement on its
website.
“(S&P‘s)
view neglects the characteristics of China’s financial market
fundraising structure and the accumulated wealth and material support
from Chinese government’s spending.”
To
be sure, China’s economic growth has unexpectedly accelerated this
year, racing ahead at 6.9 percent in the first half, but much of the
impetus has come from record bank lending in 2016, a property boom
and sharply higher government stimulus in the form of infrastructure
spending.
While
the crackdown on riskier lending has pushed up borrowing costs from
corporate loans to mortgages, it has not yet dampened growth as many
China watchers predicted.
The
International Monetary Fund warned this year that China’s credit
growth was on a “dangerous trajectory” and called for “decisive
action”, while the Bank for International Settlements said last
September that excessive credit growth was signaling a banking crisis
in the next three years.
The
IMF said in August it expected China’s total non-financial sector
debt to rise to almost 300 percent of its gross domestic product
(GDP) by 2022, up from 242 percent last year.
DEBT
BATTLE HAS MIXED SUCCESS SO FAR
Analysts
say China’s campaign to cut financial risks this year has had mixed
success, and opinions differ widely on whether Beijing is moving fast
enough, or decisively enough, to avert the dangers of a debt crisis
down the road.
Regulators
are making significant inroads in reducing interbank borrowing –
perhaps the most pressing risk - and have curbed some riskier types
of shadow banking.
But
analysts agree more comprehensive structural reforms are needed.
Though the pace of credit growth may be easing by some measures, it
continues to outpace economic growth.
And,
while stronger economic activity and sales should be giving companies
more cash flow to start paying down their debt, there is little
evidence of that yet. A recent Reuters analysis showed few listed
companies including state-controlled firms are using a profit
windfall this year to reduce their debt burden.
“There
has actually been some progress recently in tackling credit risks,
particularly in reining in the activities of the ‘shadow’ banking
sector (and) broad credit growth has slowed,” Capital Economics
said in a research note.
“But
it continues to rise relative to GDP so the overall trend remains
deeply unhealthy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.