Is
Obama Starting A War With Syria Just To Distract Us From All The
Scandals?
Michael
Snyder
23
June, 2013
Well,
isn't that convenient? At the moment when the Obama
administration is feeling more heat then ever before, it starts
another war. Suddenly everyone in the mainstream media is
talking all about Syria and not about the IRS scandal, Benghazi, NSA
snooping or any of the other political scandals that
have popped up in recent weeks. As if on cue, Obama made
headlines all over the globe on Thursday by claiming that the Syrian
government has used chemical weapons against the rebels "multiple
times", and that the U.S. was now ready to do more to assist the
rebels. That assistance is reportedly going to include
"military support" for the rebels and a no-fly zone over at
least part of Syria is being discussed. Without a doubt, these
are acts of war, and this conflict is not going to end until Assad
has been ousted. But Assad will not go quietly. And all
it would take is for Assad to fire a couple of missiles at Tel Aviv
for a huge regional war to erupt in the Middle East. And what
happens if Russia or China decides to get involved in the conflict in
Syria? Obama is playing with fire, but he has shown again and
again that he is willing to do virtually anything if it will benefit
him politically.
As
far as the Obama administration is concerned, there is no such thing
as a coincidence. The timing of this announcement regarding
Syria was not an accident. If Obama wanted to use chemical
weapons as an excuse to go after Syria he could have done it weeks
ago, or he could have waited several more months before taking
action. He chose to do it right now for a reason, and hopefully
the American people will be able to see right through this.
So
exactly what are we going to be doing for the Syrian rebels?
Well, we will definitely be arming them and training them. And
it is probably reasonable to assume that there will be American
"advisers" on the ground inside Syria helping to organize
the Syrian resistance. In fact, according to
Debka,
a large U.S. Marine force has already been deployed to the Jordanian
border with Syria.
In
addition, according to the
Wall Street Journal,
U.S. aircraft may be involved in enforcing a no-fly zone inside
Syria...
A
U.S. military proposal for arming Syrian rebels also calls for a
limited no-fly zone inside Syria that would be enforced from
Jordanian territory to protect Syrian refugees and rebels who would
train there, according to U.S. officials.
Asked
by the White House to develop options for Syria, military planners
have said that creating an area to train and equip rebel forces would
require keeping Syrian aircraft well away from the Jordanian border.
To
do that, the military envisages creating a no-fly zone stretching up
to 25 miles into Syria which would be enforced using aircraft flown
from Jordanian bases and flying inside the kingdom, according to U.S.
officials.
No
matter how you slice it, the United States is now in a state of war
with Syria. The only question is how "involved" we
are going to get.
And
several prominent Republicans are already rushing forward to applaud
Barack Obama on this latest move. The following comes from a
CBS
News
report...
Sen.
John McCain, R-Ariz., who met with the rebels last month and has been
a vocal critic of the president's Syria policy said in a joint
statement with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.: "We appreciate the
President's finding that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons
on several occasions. We also agree with the President that this fact
must affect U.S. policy toward Syria. The President's red line has
been crossed. U.S. credibility is on the line. Now is not the time to
merely take the next incremental step. Now is the time for more
decisive actions."
But
you know what? Many of these Syrian rebels have actually
pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda.
Yes,
you read that correctly.
The
whole point of the "war on terror" was to supposedly fight
al-Qaeda, but now the U.S. military is allied
with them.
Why
in the world would we want to help the people who are supposed to be
our
greatest global enemy?...
A
Syrian rebel group's pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda's replacement
for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist group's influence is
not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed
fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.
The
pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou
Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was
coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the
Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well.
Lebanese
Sheik Omar Bakri, a Salafist who says states must be governed by
Muslim religious law, says al-Qaeda has assisted al Nusra for some
time.
"They
provided them early on with technical, military and financial support
, especially when it came to setting up networks of foreign jihadis
who were brought into Syria," Bakri says. "There will
certainly be greater coordination between the two groups."
This
group of jihadists has been responsible for car and suicide bombings
all over Syria, and they are the ones that have been doing the
heaviest fighting on the front lines...
When
the group Jabhat al Nusra first claimed responsibility for car and
suicide bombings in Damascus that killed dozens last January, many of
Syria’s revolutionaries claimed that the organization was a
creation of the Syrian government, designed to discredit those who
opposed the regime of President Bashar Assad and to hide the regime’s
own brutal tactics.
Nearly
a year later, however, Jabhat al Nusra, which U.S. officials believe
has links to al Qaida, has become essential to the frontline
operations of the rebels fighting to topple Assad.
Not
only does the group still conduct suicide bombings that have killed
hundreds, but they’ve proved to be critical to the rebels’
military advance. In battle after battle across the country, Nusra
and similar groups do the heaviest frontline fighting. Groups who
call themselves the Free Syrian Army and report to military councils
led by defected Syrian army officers move into the captured territory
afterward.
The
prominence of Nusra in the rebel cause worries U.S. and other Western
officials, who say its operations rely on the same people and tactics
that fueled al Qaida in Iraq – an assertion that is borne out by
interviews with Nusra members in Syria.
These
are no "freedom fighters". In fact, if these guys
take over they will be much worse than Assad. These "rebels"
recently massacred
an entire villages of Christians,
and just
two days ago
they slaughtered a 14-year-old boy for supposedly insulting
Mohammed...
The
rebels, according
to ABC News’ reconstruction of the Syrian groups’ reports,
appear to have whipped Qatta. When they brought him back to where
they’d taken him, his head was wrapped by a shirt.
The
rebels waited for a crowd to gather; Qatta’s parents were among
them. Speaking in classical Arabic, they announced that Qatta had
committed blasphemy and that anyone else who dared insult the Prophet
Mohammed would share his fate. Then, the shirt still wrapped around
the boy’s head, the rebels shot him in the mouth and neck.
Is
this really who the U.S. government wants to be allies with?
Are
we that stupid?
And
guess what? According to the
Los Angeles Times,
the Obama administration is considering plans to bring all of the
poor "refugees" that are allied with these "rebels"
to the United States...
Two
years into a civil war that shows no signs of ending, the Obama
administration is considering resettling refugees who have fled
Syria, part of an international effort that could bring thousands of
Syrians to American cities and towns.
A
resettlement plan under discussion in Washington and other capitals
is aimed at relieving pressure on Middle Eastern countries straining
to support 1.6 million refugees, as well as assisting hard-hit Syrian
families.
But
now we are committed to this conflict thanks to Obama.
There
will be no backing down until Assad is gone.
Of
course this could create a huge regional war in the Middle East or
even eventually lead to World War III, but Obama doesn't seem to
care.
For
now, Obama is saving his own skin, and that is the most important
thing to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.