A
leaked far-Right report and a plot within the National Party
“It’s
crazy, Tea Party stuff, proposing to sell our politics to business
and American interests.
The
leak itself reveals a deep split in the party as factions gear up to
fight for the wreckage post Key. Far from the Nats “turning on”
an outside advisor, The Nation mentions “sitting MPs” and support
for Lusk “within National’s caucus” – presumably the Collins
faction.”
Breaking
News: Dark plot about to be exposed within National Party
Martyn
Bradbury
26
January, 2013
The
Daily Blog tip line is
running hot with
rumours that the Prime Ministers Office is about to leak to the NZ
Herald a list of National Party MPs who are paying consultants who
have dark intentions.
The
Daily Blog has blogged
that there are forces working in the National Party to
manufacture the emergence of a hard right Government. This
has been backed up by the National Party itself who found one such
consultant had a very negative agenda for the Party.
We
asked if the Aaron Gilmore affair was an inside political hit
job,and after that, the PMs office has done some fishing and
have found plans put together by some of these consultants that one
inside source said “if these ever found their way into the hands
of Nicky Hager, it would be over for National’.
The
National Party hierarchy believe they can further their agenda via
soft selling the changes as opposed to a semi-fascist one and have
made the decision to leak to the Herald to kill this off.
The
anti-reactionary centrists want to put all that reactionary
influence outside the Party and place it with the Conservative Party
(expect a deal for Colin Craig in Rodney), where as the
pro-reactionary clique want to kill off the Conservatives to keep
that extremism within the Party.
Expect
the next couple if weeks to be bumpy for National.
HERE
is a link to the leaked Lusk paper
National
turns on hard right advisor
Simon
Lusk pushed to get rid of the "wet wing" and make sure MPs
obeyed donors. Now a leaker has revealed his agenda in an attempt to
discredit him
1
June, 2013
Leaked
documents written by a political strategist who has trained National
MPs set out a vision for taking the party to the right of the
political spectrum, tripling donations to $6 million a year and using
donations and government jobs as inducements to control MPs.
Written
by political strategist Simon Lusk, the papers were leaked by a
"senior National Party source" to the Weekend Herald, TV3's
The Nation and Fairfax.
The
leaker was clear in his purpose - the National Party needed to clean
house. It might be the broadest church in politics - as its 49 per
cent poll rating suggests - but the insider says there is no more
room for Mr Lusk and associates, who include blogger Cameron Slater.
The
leaker was clear in his objective when contacting the Herald. "As
far as I am concerned, dealing to them is not about airing dirty
National Party laundry, but disposing of a political nuisance."
The
disclosure reveals details of a plan which so disturbed the party
that, at a board meeting in March 2012, it was warned of Mr Lusk
having "a very negative agenda for the party".
The
warning came after then-senior whip Michael Woodhouse was briefed on
a paper written by Mr Lusk dated February 2012 and titled "Building
A Conservative Fiscal Majority." It begins: "This National
government has been a disappointment to fiscal conservatives.
The
wet wing of the National Party control the senior ranks of the party
and cannot be easily replaced without losing an election. After
National loses an election there will be a clean out."
The
purpose now, he said, was to plan ahead to "move the political
centre to the right". "New Zealand's political market is
exceptionally retarded. The first organised group to professionalise
and fund politics properly will obtain prime mover advantage and
control the market for sometime. This is a one-off opportunity to
exploit the gap in the market and I am looking to exploit this gap."
Mr
Lusk's plan began with selecting like-minded candidates young and
seeding them in "safe blue" electorates which would vote
National. He said local body politics should be targeted to get
"fiscal conservative" councillors and mayors. And training
was the key for the politicians, he said, so "when they are
elected they can make real change based on solid planning rather than
intent".
The
message was also important - "dominate the media by controlling
the message through credible right wing blogs". Mr Lusk also
said there needed to be a focus on "taking over the public
sector" to create a pool of fiscal conservatives who would work
with politicians.
He
also recommended making fundraising more professional and dominating
company boards to help build a "war chest". "I can
provide resumes for several people who are fiscal conservatives and
understand the role they will play in the future."
He
said National raised $2 million a year, which needed to triple in
size. "Union money will not be able to match business money."
Overall,
the work needed to be guided by a long-term strategy which would see
a smaller government which was focused on "changing education,
increasing mining's contribution to GDP and making property
development easier".
He
urged those reading it to "stop donating to the current
government". "They have not listened and will not listen."
He urged supporters to "blackball" current MPs to stop them
"trading on their time as MPs to build a lucrative business
career". It would show MPs "the consequences of ignoring
donors". "If donors buy into this and the next National
government does not offer former ministers jobs then there will be a
very clear incentive for the next crop of ministers to listen
carefully to donors rather than ignoring them."
The
verbal briefing to Mr Woodhouse was only one way Mr Lusk attempted to
extend his reach across the party. A member of the Prime Minister's
office was also briefed and given documents. Mr Key has kept Mr Lusk
at arm's length and is known to have little regard for him.
Mr
Lusk's briefing came at a time when he was organising training
sessions for potential National Party candidates. Disgraced MP Aaron
Gilmore was among those keen to attend but was rejected after he
failed to meet the fees charged.
It
was these training sessions which one former MP believed gave Mr Lusk
access to the party's inner workings. At the time, the party's
"candidates college" was known to be weak while Mr Lusk,
along with Mr Slater, were offering training they said prepared
potential candidates for political life.
The
party recoiled when it discovered he was running the sessions -
particularly when its board was told how potential MPs and current
MPs were attending. Board minutes from 2012 recorded an upcoming
session for local body candidates. "Some Caucus members feel
that they should be involved in this training programme," the
minutes say.
Longtime
National Party member David Farrar, who runs Kiwiblog, was listed as
a speaker at a February 2012 session at the Kauri Glen Lodge in
Puhoi, north of Auckland, where the session was held. He pulled out.
"I
was asked not to," he said, saying "party hierarchy"
made the request. "It would look as if it were officially
sanctioned," he said. He stayed for the social aspect - Mr
Slater posted on his Whaleoil blog a photograph of Mr Farrar's rental
car reversed over a wall - before leaving.
Political
scientist Dr Bryce Edwards said the leak and the people it targeted
revealed a glimpse into the "Cold War" for succession to
the leadership of the National Party. "This is a simple left and
right split in the National Party - and the struggle over the future
ideological direction and leadership." On the pragmatic
centre-ist side was "Minister for Everything" Steven Joyce
while to his right (politically) was Justice Minister Judith Collins.
Dr Edwards said Mr Slater was known to be close to Ms Collins.
The
minister showed her own faith in Mr Slater, quoting his blog on
Twitter and telling readers: "You might not like it but Whaleoil
is better informed and better read than any other news outlet or
social media."
Dr
Edwards said the struggle was suppressed but constant. "It is a
cold war, not a civil war."
A
spokesman for both ministers rejected any involvement in a power
struggle or connection to the leak. "It's all just a joke and we
don't have anything to do with it."
Party
president Peter Goodfellow said an internal power struggle was "a
very far-fetched theory". "Whether such factions exist is
highly dubious. There's no apparent division."
Having
had sections of Mr Lusk's paper read to him, he said the views
sounded "extreme". "Some of Mr Lusk's economic views
would not be shared by the majority.
"We
are a broad church. We can encompass most views."
Mr
Goodfellow said the party had worked hard to improve training for
candidates in recent years and "the need for his services has
probably diminished". "We went out of our way to make sure
it was more relevant to what people wanted." He said he did not
make the call to Mr Farrar but "would have encouraged him not to
participate either". "We would encourage our senior party
people to be involved in our own internal process."
Mr
Lusk is based in Hawkes Bay and spends his days hunting and fishing.
He is involved in a fine wine trading company based in the British
Virgin Island, where he is also connected to a lobster farming
project. His political involvement saw National MP Sam Lotu-Iiga pay
tribute to "the shrewd counsel of Simon Lusk" in his 2008
maiden speech. Other MPs said to have leaned on him for advice
include Chris Tremain and Louise Upston. He did not return calls.
Shades
of Blue
The
National Party is a broad church, with many factions. They include:
Blue
Greens
They're
National but they're conservationists. Nick Smith is the greenest
blue in the party.
Blue
Liberals
National
with a heart - Katherine Rich showed her liberal streak when she
rejected Don Brash's social welfare plans.
Fiscal
Conservatives
Small
government, big business. Former party leader Don Brash later ran
Act.
Internats
The
overseas wing of the party. Prime Minister John Key is the ultimate
homecoming story.
Young
Nats
The
path to the party from an early age. Nikki Kaye is currently the
youngest minister in the House.
SuperBlues
The
superannuitant wing. Dr Paul Hutchison has just picked up his Gold
Card.
Ports
and bloggers colluded: strategist
A
political strategist who has trained National Party MPs says the
Ports of Auckland colluded with right wing bloggers to undermine
industrial action against the Ports of Auckland.
1
June, 2013
The
claim is in a leaked document written by controversial strategist
Simon Lusk - and hotly denied by the publicly-owned port company.
The
document was dated February 2012 - when the port strike was most
heated - and is part of Mr Lusk's strategy for the National Party.
It
read: "The right currently controls the blogosphere, and the
political journalists repeat much of what appears on blogs.
"The
case in point is the way the Maritime Union have received huge
negative publicity about their salaries, based on POAL (Ports of
Auckland Limited) working with certain bloggers to control the story.
Financial support for these bloggers will enable them to build their
credibility and readership."
The
issue of port workers' salaries became a central feature of the
heated industrial action and was covered by a number of blogs,
including the Whaleoil site run by blogger Cameron Slater, who was
running rogue training courses for aspiring National MPs with Mr
Lusk.
Mr
Slater's blog revealed personal details about a striking worker's
bereavement leave after the death of his wife and the company's
efforts to assist him. The Privacy Commission later found the port
had leaked personal details of its staff to the blog.
Ports
of Auckland adviser Brent Impey said there was no collusion with any
blogger, including the Whaleoil blog. He said Mr Slater had been
granted access to the port "no different from any other
journalist".
"Anyone
who rings up who is going to be publishing, you give them the time of
day."
He
said the port did not know how the information was leaked. "We
have carried out as much investigation as we can to find out how that
information got out there. We have tightened systems since."
Mr
Lusk's plan was rejected by the National Party the same month it was
written, with former senior whip Michael Woodhouse telling the board
the strategist had a "very negative agenda".
But
Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly said there had been a
concerted attack on unions by Mr Slater. She said Mr Slater was
"irrelevant" but was concerned about the port "putting
the knife into its own staff".
Mr
Slater had since targeted a number of unions. Meat Workers Union
president Graham Cooke said the blog had attacked the organisation on
a regular basis.
"What's
worse is it was unwarranted. It was factually inaccurate and poorly
researched."
He
said he believed the attacks were driven by the industry in which the
union's members worked. "Without a doubt there was a concerted
campaign against us."
Mr
Slater said he covered the strike as other media outlets did. He said
there was no arrangement with the port to do so and he had not
discussed it with Mr Lusk.
He
said yesterday he had never actually been paid although believed he
should be. On the port, he said: "I hate unions pathologically.
I've hated them since I was 15 years old and I would do it for free.
"I
have never been paid for any posts about unions, ever."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.